{"id":205888,"date":"2017-07-15T23:42:15","date_gmt":"2017-07-16T03:42:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/even-without-budget-lawmakers-race-to-finish-spending-bills-ee-news\/"},"modified":"2017-07-15T23:42:15","modified_gmt":"2017-07-16T03:42:15","slug":"even-without-budget-lawmakers-race-to-finish-spending-bills-ee-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/even-without-budget-lawmakers-race-to-finish-spending-bills-ee-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Even without budget, lawmakers race to finish spending bills &#8211; E&#038;E News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>    Geof Koss and George Cahlink, E&E News    reporters  <\/p>\n<p>    Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), ranking member of the Senate Interior    and Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, has concerns about    moving forward with funding legislation without a bipartisan    deal on spending caps. Anthony    DeYoung\/National Park Service\/Flickr  <\/p>\n<p>    Senate and House appropriators continue to press ahead with    their fiscal 2018 spending bills, despite lacking a broad    bipartisan deal that would allow them to eventually become law.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico, the top Democrat on the Interior    and Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, said yesterday he    expects that panel to mark up its fiscal 2018 bill \"in the next    week or so.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We're still having discussions and working together, and most    of our hearings have been pretty good in terms of fleshing out    the issues, and I feel there's a lot of bipartisanship there,\"    he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, the lack of a top-line spending number  normally set    in the budget resolution  is hampering efforts.  <\/p>\n<p>    The full Senate Appropriations Committee yesterday advanced the    fiscal 2018 military construction and Veteran Affairs bill,    typically one of the less controversial spending measures.  <\/p>\n<p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>    Udall said drafters followed numbers set by the years-old    Budget Control Act. Democrats unsuccessfully tried to increase    the $88.9 billion measure by $1.6 billion, contingent on a new    budget deal lifting spending caps in the coming weeks.  <\/p>\n<p>    That agreement should include \"parity\" between defense and    non-defense spending, Udall said. \"That's how we negotiated    last time,\" he said. \"Eventually everybody came to the table    and came up with a number.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Parity and the omission of contentious policy riders would    again be the terms for a deal, Udall said. \"We're sticking with    those,\" he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    While the fiscal 2017 Interior-Environment bill had a sizable    number of riders, Democrats \"were able to get them out for the    omnibus,\" Udall noted.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The best argument right now is, when you're dealing with an    all-Republican Congress and all-Republican president, if they    want to do things substantively they should do them in the    authorizing committee and pass them,\" he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) decision to    delay the start of the August recess for two weeks could help    the appropriations process along, Udall said.  <\/p>\n<p>    But if spending caps aren't determined \"until well into    August,\" that increases the likelihood of a continuing    resolution to keep the government open in September, when the    fiscal year ends.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"I'm not saying we're there yet, but the more you get backed up    and don't have these numbers,\" the greater the odds are for a    CR, Udall said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said yesterday the House is \"well    ahead of schedule\" for moving the spending bills with all 12    expected to be out of committee by next week (see related    story). Ryan said he's now weighing options for moving    them to the floor but did not offer a specific timeline.  <\/p>\n<p>    A House leadership aide said it's possible some of the more    bipartisan spending bills, covering the military and veterans,    could be taken up before the chamber leaves for its summer    break late this month.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ryan said he's open to a bipartisan deal on spending with the    Senate but suggested the House would adopt its own budget as a    first step. The nonbinding plan sets overall spending for the    year and usually is a prerequisite to appropriations bills    moving to the floor.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"This is the classic legislative process. The House moves with    its position, the Senate moves with theirs, and then we    negotiate a compromise at the end of the day,\" said Ryan.  <\/p>\n<p>    After weeks of delays, the House Budget Committee could mark up    its fiscal 2018 budget resolution next week and then have it on    the floor by the end of the month. Several markups have been    postponed as conservatives have pressed for deeper cuts in    mandatory spending and specifics on a future tax overhaul.  <\/p>\n<p>    Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), chairman of the hard-right Freedom    Caucus, said yesterday that $200 billion in mandatory cuts over    10 years in a draft House budget proposal might not be enough    if there are large increases in discretionary spending. He also    said any tax provisions should not include the border    adjustment tax, which he said won't fly in the Senate and would    create false savings (see related story).  <\/p>\n<p>    The House GOP caucus is due to huddle this morning to weigh its    budget options and could finalize plans for a markup.  <\/p>\n<p>    Democrats in both chambers, meanwhile, were quick to tout a new    assessment of the White House fiscal 2018 spending blueprint    released yesterday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget    Office. It found President Trump's plan would reduce the    deficit but not balance in 10 years as the administration    predicted.  <\/p>\n<p>    House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called on the GOP    to work with Democrats to come up with an alternative. \"Instead    of following down the president's road to ruin, House    Republicans should join Democrats to pass a budget that creates    jobs and raises wages for working families across America,\" she    said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>    Senate and House appropriators continue to press ahead with    their fiscal 2018 spending bills, despite lacking a broad    bipartisan deal that would allow them to eventually become law.  <\/p>\n<p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>      The essential news for energy & environment professionals    <\/p>\n<p>       1996-2017 Environment & Energy Publishing,      LLCPrivacy      PolicySite      Map    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.eenews.net\/eedaily\/2017\/07\/14\/stories\/1060057374\" title=\"Even without budget, lawmakers race to finish spending bills - E&E News\">Even without budget, lawmakers race to finish spending bills - E&E News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Advertisement Geof Koss and George Cahlink, E&#038;E News reporters Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), ranking member of the Senate Interior and Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, has concerns about moving forward with funding legislation without a bipartisan deal on spending caps. Anthony DeYoung\/National Park Service\/Flickr Senate and House appropriators continue to press ahead with their fiscal 2018 spending bills, despite lacking a broad bipartisan deal that would allow them to eventually become law <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/even-without-budget-lawmakers-race-to-finish-spending-bills-ee-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187823],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-205888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fiscal-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205888"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205888"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205888\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}