Guns seem to be a regular topic in the newspaper, along with references to the Second Amendment, which protects the citizens' right to keep and bear same. <\/p>\n
I was curious, so I read it: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. <\/p>\n
As a strict constructionist, I would like to advocate for the intent of the writers of this article. <\/p>\n
Seems to me that those who keep and bear arms ought to be enrolled in a well regulated militia, currently known as the National Guard or the military reserve. These citizens would be trained and ready should our nation require their services when we are threatened by Native Americans or forces of the British, French or Spanish governments. <\/p>\n
We could even designate certain units for advanced training in nuclear weaponry, air combat, operation of a submarine or aircraft carrier, and special ops. We would no longer need a standing military force, since the citizenry would stand ready when needed. This could result in a great savings from the national budget, and allow Medicaid to become a national health care system. <\/p>\n
If called, I will gladly bring my bow, arrows and slingshot. <\/p>\n
William A. Kaeppel Florissant <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Excerpt from: Guns seem to be a regular topic in the newspaper, along with references to the Second Amendment, which protects the citizens' right to keep and bear same. I was curious, so I read it: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. As a strict constructionist, I would like to advocate for the intent of the writers of this article Continue reading
\nDetermining what the Second Amendment means for today - STLtoday.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"