{"id":204926,"date":"2017-07-11T22:00:52","date_gmt":"2017-07-12T02:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/south-korea-says-north-doesnt-have-icbm-re-entry-technology-reuters\/"},"modified":"2017-07-11T22:00:52","modified_gmt":"2017-07-12T02:00:52","slug":"south-korea-says-north-doesnt-have-icbm-re-entry-technology-reuters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/south-korea-says-north-doesnt-have-icbm-re-entry-technology-reuters\/","title":{"rendered":"South Korea says North doesn&#8217;t have ICBM re-entry technology &#8211; Reuters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    SEOUL (Reuters) - South Korea's intelligence agency does not    believe North Korea has secured re-entry capabilities for its    intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) program, a South    Korean lawmaker said on Tuesday, disputing Pyongyang's account.  <\/p>\n<p>    North Korea launched what was said to be a nuclear-capable ICBM    last week as it presses on with its nuclear and missile    programs in defiance of United Nations sanctions.  <\/p>\n<p>    Pyongyang's state media said last week's test successfully    verified the atmospheric re-entry of the warhead loaded on the    test-launched missile, which experts say may be able to reach    the U.S. state of Alaska.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, Yi Wan-young, who is also a member of South Korean    parliament's intelligence committee, told reporters during a    televised briefing that South Korea's National Intelligence    Service has not been able to confirm that re-entry was    successful.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Considering how North Korea does not have any testing    facilities (for re-entry technology), the agency believes    (North Korea) has not yet secured that technology,\" he said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yi said the agency believed the missile launched last week was    a modified version of the KN-17 intermediate range missile that    was tested in May.  <\/p>\n<p>    He also said the agency had not detected any unusual activity    at North Korea's Punggye-ri nuclear test site.  <\/p>\n<p>      Reporting by Se Young Lee; Editing by Paul Tait    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-northkorea-missile-idUSKBN19W0A1\" title=\"South Korea says North doesn't have ICBM re-entry technology - Reuters\">South Korea says North doesn't have ICBM re-entry technology - Reuters<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> SEOUL (Reuters) - South Korea's intelligence agency does not believe North Korea has secured re-entry capabilities for its intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) program, a South Korean lawmaker said on Tuesday, disputing Pyongyang's account. North Korea launched what was said to be a nuclear-capable ICBM last week as it presses on with its nuclear and missile programs in defiance of United Nations sanctions. Pyongyang's state media said last week's test successfully verified the atmospheric re-entry of the warhead loaded on the test-launched missile, which experts say may be able to reach the U.S <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/south-korea-says-north-doesnt-have-icbm-re-entry-technology-reuters\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187726],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204926","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204926"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204926"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204926\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}