James Carpenter just needed some fake Moon dirt. Carpenter, a lunar-exploration expert at the European Space Agency (ESA) in Noordwijk, the Netherlands, works on a drill designed to hunt for buried ice on the Moon. His team recently ordered half a tonne of powdery materialto replicate the lunar surfacefrom a commercial supplier in the United States. But what showed up was not what the team was expecting. The physical properties were visibly different, says Carpenter. <\/p>\n
His experience underscores a longstanding problem with artificial space soils, known as simulants: how to make them consistently and reliably. But now there is a fresh effort to bring the field into line. Last month, NASA established a team of scientists from eight of its research centres to analyse the physical properties and availability of existing simulants. And, for the first time, an asteroid-mining company in Florida is making scientifically accurate powders meant to represent the surfaces of four classes of asteroid. It delivered its second batch to NASA on June 28. <\/p>\n
NASA is trying to conquer the Wild West of simulants, says Philip Metzger, a planetary scientist at the University of Central Florida in Orlando. <\/p>\n
Such materials are meant to mimic the mix of dust and broken rock that covers the surfaces of planets and asteroids. Engineers use the artificial soils to testspace-exploration technologies such as drills and rovers, and to determine whether astronauts could make structures by feeding space dirtinto 3D printersor by compressing it. Scientists use simulants to explore geological processes such as how rocks weather in space. <\/p>\n
Over the years, space agencies and research groups have tended to make their own artificial soils as needed from mixtures of ash and grit, sand and crushed bricks, and even glass beads. This has led to a wild proliferation of soils; there are more than 30 lunar simulants alone. There are a lot of people out there creating their own simulant with no geology or materials-processing background, says Jennifer Edmunson, a geologist at NASAs Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. <\/p>\n
But no artificial soil can re-create all the physical and chemical properties of a planet's surface. A mixture that was developed for engineers to drive rovers in would probably be terrible for studying the geochemical properties of the Moon. <\/p>\n
Researchers do not always pay attention to those limitations, says Clive Neal, a lunar scientist at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana. We have no accreditation in terms of what this can be used for and what it cant be used for, he says. If you use it for the wrong thing you end up with misleading results. <\/p>\n
In 2010, a panel of lunar scientists recommended that NASA develop a database that researchers could use to compare the characteristics of different simulants and pick the best one for each use. But the agency had no money to support such a project. The new working group aims to outline how much it would cost to produce a database covering simulants for all types of planetary bodies. Hopefully, well be able to develop this repository, says Brad Bailey, associate director of NASAs Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute, who is based in Washington DC. <\/p>\n
The database would include the four new asteroid simulants being made by the Orlando office of Deep Space Industries, an asteroid-mining company. NASA has ordered five tonnes over the next two years. Each simulant is based on a different class of meteorites called carbonaceous chondrites, which are thought to be chunks of asteroids. <\/p>\n
To make fake asteroid dirt, technicians mix various mineralsincluding bronzite, which is sourced from jewellery suppliers as polished stonescompress them into bricks and then pulverize them. We have to do something that is basically equivalent to hitting a solid rock with thousands of meteorites over a long period of time, says Stephen Covey, the companys director of research and development. <\/p>\n
Deep Space Industries delivered 512 kilograms of the first simulant to NASA in March, and 532 kilograms of the second type in June. The agency plans to use it in work on missions such as OSIRIS-REx, a spacecraft that is making its way to an asteroidto collect a sample and bring it back to Earth. <\/p>\n
In Europe, Carpenter and his colleagues are still hunting for their perfect lunar soilbut they have given up on ordering it commercially. The researchers, who need 700 tonnes for a planned lunar habitat at ESAs astronaut-training centre in Cologne, Germany, are looking much closer to home. They have decided to grind up rocks from the nearby basalt mines of the Eifel region. <\/p>\n
This article is reproduced with permission and wasfirst publishedon July 7, 2017. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the original post: <\/p>\n
Why Researchers Need Better Space Dirt - Scientific American<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" James Carpenter just needed some fake Moon dirt. Carpenter, a lunar-exploration expert at the European Space Agency (ESA) in Noordwijk, the Netherlands, works on a drill designed to hunt for buried ice on the Moon. His team recently ordered half a tonne of powdery materialto replicate the lunar surfacefrom a commercial supplier in the United States Continue reading