{"id":20472,"date":"2013-12-30T12:41:46","date_gmt":"2013-12-30T17:41:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/walter-block-is-still-defending-the-undefendable\/"},"modified":"2013-12-30T12:41:46","modified_gmt":"2013-12-30T17:41:46","slug":"walter-block-is-still-defending-the-undefendable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/libertarianism\/walter-block-is-still-defending-the-undefendable\/","title":{"rendered":"Walter Block Is Still Defending the Undefendable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Walter Block is at his finest when he subjects the most    loathsome jobs and nastiest behaviors to a logical and    libertarian scrutiny. Blocks Defending the Undefendable    has needled and irritated an entire generation of readers and    compelled many to re-examine long-held beliefs in favor of the    logic of libertarianism. Now comes volume 2, Defending the    Undefendable: Freedom in All Realms (with a foreword by Ron    Paul) that promises more such irritation for future    generations.  <\/p>\n<p>    The introduction is a short course in libertarianism. Block    explains that libertarianism is a political philosophy that    shows when the use of coercion is justified or not justified.    The book examines 30 cases that are often seen as illegal,    immoral, or unethical. Block analyzes each case by subjecting    it to a libertarian standard, and ultimately exonerates each    from punishment by government.  <\/p>\n<p>    Please note: the author is only defending these cases by the    political standard of libertarianism and whether they should    face coercive threat from the state. It does not mean by any    stretch of the imagination that this implies approval and    commendation. It simply means they should not go to jail for    their behavior.  <\/p>\n<p>    The examination of these hard cases is what helps us sharpen    our understanding of libertarianism and our ability to debate    and defend the free society. I agree with the author that    studying hard cases strengthens libertarianism and improves the    likelihood of achieving a free society. Much of my own research    has been on such hard cases, such as drug dealers and    smugglers. People, particularly college students, find such    cases interesting and often convincing.  <\/p>\n<p>    Speaking of hard cases, one of my colleagues recently visited    South Africa. He saw that private security was everywhere. He    was told that he and his belongings were safe with private    security, but not safe where government police was in charge.    My colleague noted that a nation that understands that the    market provides a better service for security, the hardest of    all cases, is going to be more easily convinced that the market    can provide a better garbage collection service.  <\/p>\n<p>    The book is divided into seven sections. The first, on trade,    contains five short chapters: The Multinational Enterpriser,    The Smuggler, British Petroleum, Nuclear Energy, and The    Corporate Raider.  <\/p>\n<p>    British Petroleum is a good hard case because everyone knows    about the accident in the Gulf of Mexico, the 200 million    gallons of oil that was spilled, and that BP has been vilified    by the media pundits and politicians because of it. Block    begins by calling the people at BP heroes in part because they    do the dangerous work so we can comfortably drive across town    at 10 cents a mile.  <\/p>\n<p>    Block asks if BP knew the dangers of deep water drilling. Of    course they did, but government regulations prevent shallow    water drilling near the shoreline and provide incentives to    drill in deep water far out at sea. Meanwhile government    regulators were not doing their job, goofing off, taking    bribes, and they failed to upgrade safety standards to account    for the new deep water drilling.  <\/p>\n<p>    As BP was vilified for negligence and as the oil continued to    seep into the the gulf, the U.S. government turned down offers    of assistance from foreign companies that specialized in such    spills and who had more experience than U.S. firms. Ships from    foreign countries also offered their assistance, but like after    Hurricane Katrina, the volunteers were turned away. Block    argues persuasively why such disasters are very unlikely to    happen in a libertarian society and that this tragedy was the    result of government intervention.  <\/p>\n<p>    The second section on labor looks at the cases of The Hatchet    Man, The Home Worker, The Picket-Line Crosser, The    Daycare Provider, and The Automator. In the case of    automation, it does destroy some jobs, and creates new jobs,    and this should be celebrated by society, not denigrated or    sabotaged. Technological advance is the main source of rising    prosperity and job creation. Machines can increase our    productivity and free up labor to produce other goods that are    in short supply. The chapter does a wonderful job of showing    how this process takes place and how we all benefit from    automation and robots.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See more here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/mises.org\/daily\/6624\/Walter-Block-Is-Still-Defending-the-Undefendable\" title=\"Walter Block Is Still Defending the Undefendable\">Walter Block Is Still Defending the Undefendable<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Walter Block is at his finest when he subjects the most loathsome jobs and nastiest behaviors to a logical and libertarian scrutiny. Blocks Defending the Undefendable has needled and irritated an entire generation of readers and compelled many to re-examine long-held beliefs in favor of the logic of libertarianism.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/libertarianism\/walter-block-is-still-defending-the-undefendable\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libertarianism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20472"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20472\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}