{"id":204373,"date":"2017-07-08T04:41:18","date_gmt":"2017-07-08T08:41:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/let-the-libertarian-debate-the-washington-post-washington-post\/"},"modified":"2017-07-08T04:41:18","modified_gmt":"2017-07-08T08:41:18","slug":"let-the-libertarian-debate-the-washington-post-washington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/libertarian\/let-the-libertarian-debate-the-washington-post-washington-post\/","title":{"rendered":"Let the Libertarian debate &#8211; The Washington Post &#8211; Washington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Summer in a gubernatorial election year means its time to    start the debate over the number of debates.  <\/p>\n<p>    And it has, with a flourish. Republican nominee Ed Gillespie    proposed a series of 10 debates    with Democratic nominee Ralph Northam, a somewhat more modest    demand than the     15 debatesRepublican Ken Cuccinelli demanded of    Democrat Terry McAuliffe in 2013.  <\/p>\n<p>    Northam has     accepted threedebatesand seven joint    appearances, but he dismissed the overall demand as a public    relations stunt.  <\/p>\n<p>    Gillespie called Northams counter-offer insulting.  <\/p>\n<p>    Both candidates are correct. This is a public relations stunt,    as Northam said, and a very old, tired one at that. It is also    insulting, but not in the way Gillespie meant.  <\/p>\n<p>    The insult is that gubernatorial debates in Virginia are little    more than smaller versions of the carefully packaged affairs    weve all witnessed at the national level.  <\/p>\n<p>    What people watch for and what the press and political junkies    delight in are those gotcha moments that make for great copy    and easy attack lines.  <\/p>\n<p>    But lets indulge Gillespie on his demand for many debates and    ignore his own     ducking and dodging on the issue in the waning months of    the Republican primary.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lets have 10 debates. Or 19, as the Roanoke Times     has suggested.  <\/p>\n<p>    But lets also insist on a couple of things.  <\/p>\n<p>    Libertarians had a good case for being included in the 2013    debates between Cuccinelli and McAuliffe. But their candidate,    Robert Sarvis, had to settle for     running an ad during one debate. He was excluded from    another by a     media outlet because he didnt qualify under debate rules    worked out between the major-party candidates.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bipartisan agreement is easy to find, especially if it leads to    keeping voters in the dark.  <\/p>\n<p>    While Sarvis ended up winning just     6.5 percent of the vote, and Republicans still blame his    campaign for costing Cuccinelli the election (a claim Paul    Goldman and I     refuted), including Sarvis on the debate stage would have    offered voters a bit of relief from that campaigns incessant    negativity.  <\/p>\n<p>    It also might have offered them a critique of the major    parties, their policies and their records.  <\/p>\n<p>    That would have been refreshing and enlightening.  <\/p>\n<p>    Hyra campaign director John Vaught LaBeaume told me that his    candidate would be willing to participate in any and all    debates or forums that both the Democratic and Republican    candidates agree to take part in.  <\/p>\n<p>    As he should.  <\/p>\n<p>    LaBeaume also hopes the debate organizers are open to including    Hyra and do not fall prey to the self-interested campaigns of    the Democratic and GOP nominees.  <\/p>\n<p>    That would mean the Northam and Gillespie campaigns would have    to agree to allow Hyra in as part of their ground rules for    debating one another.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thats self-serving and should not be tolerated by any debate    sponsor, particularly if that sponsor is a media organization.  <\/p>\n<p>    To its credit, Roanoke television station WDBJtried    to get the campaigns to agree to allow Sarvis to join the    debate the station sponsored in 2013 owing to quite a bit of    negative reaction to [his] exclusion.  <\/p>\n<p>    The McAuliffe campaign was somewhat interested in the idea; the    Cuccinelli campaign wasnt.  <\/p>\n<p>    Should we expect a similar outcome this year?  <\/p>\n<p>    Gillespie spokesman David Abrams told me, Either Ed or Ralph    Northam is going to be the next governor of Virginia, which is    why the organizations sponsoring debates invited them.  <\/p>\n<p>    Northam spokesman David Turner told me the campaign would    agree to include Hyra in the debates.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thats a good first step. One that fits Northams political    calculus, but still good. Candidates should agree to    participate in as many as possible and televise them all. And    organizers truly interested in an exchange of ideas rather than    a clash of talking points dont allow the candidates to dictate    terms.  <\/p>\n<p>    After all,     youre paying for the microphone.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Visit link:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/all-opinions-are-local\/wp\/2017\/07\/06\/let-the-libertarian-debate\/\" title=\"Let the Libertarian debate - The Washington Post - Washington Post\">Let the Libertarian debate - The Washington Post - Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Summer in a gubernatorial election year means its time to start the debate over the number of debates. And it has, with a flourish.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/libertarian\/let-the-libertarian-debate-the-washington-post-washington-post\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187826],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libertarian"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204373"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204373\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}