{"id":204025,"date":"2017-07-07T02:07:39","date_gmt":"2017-07-07T06:07:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/remote-access-widespread-but-still-evolving-automation-world\/"},"modified":"2017-07-07T02:07:39","modified_gmt":"2017-07-07T06:07:39","slug":"remote-access-widespread-but-still-evolving-automation-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/automation\/remote-access-widespread-but-still-evolving-automation-world\/","title":{"rendered":"Remote Access: Widespread but Still Evolving &#8211; Automation World"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Whether taking a walk down the hall or hopping a flight to some    far-flung destination, monitoring plant operations or large    assets in the field has traditionally been an on-site role.    Thanks to the emergence of remote access technologies, however,    the need to be physically present to problem solve or monitor    operations is fast becoming a thing of the past. Despite    companies increasing level of comfort with remote access in    general, they remain slow to expand usage into more    sophisticated areas, including predictive maintenance    applications enabled by the Industrial Internet of Things    (IIoT).  <\/p>\n<p>    A recent Automation World survey confirms that remote    access is no longer a fledgling technology embraced by a    limited number of early pioneers. Almost three quarters of    survey respondents (72 percent) are employing remote access    technologies to gain entre to plant equipment and data while    off site. Not surprisingly, the same number of respondents have    multiple plant locations, which in part explains their interest    in remote access technologies as a way to keep tabs on    distributed operations. Among those who have yet to implement    remote access technology, 46 percent say they plan to do so;    the other 54 percent, however, say their companies do not    permit it.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite a small amount of reticence, remote access technology    is not a novel application. About 40 percent of the companies    responding to our survey have had remote access capabilities in    place for industrial applications for longer than five years;    an additional 31 percent have been using the technology for one    to five years.  <\/p>\n<p>    Overall, manufacturers are making more liberal use of remote    access functionality, but usage is highly varied depending on    industry, according to Matt Wells, general manager of    automation software for GE    Digital. Vertical market segments such as wind, water,    power transmission and marine, for example, are far more likely    to invest in the technology compared with traditional    manufacturers, which still tend to be more plant-centric.    Anyone dealing with distributed fleets has a strong demand to    be able to see, manage or control it from a remote spot, he    explains. It all comes down to the difficulty of accessing    that remote asset.  <\/p>\n<p>    Going mobile    Increased demand for remote access is inextricably tied to the    rise of mobile devices, which are now ubiquitous among    operators and other plant floor personnel. The whole concept of    mobility gives operators the freedom to monitor devices or    collect usage data on equipment without being physically    present or tethered to a specific programmable logic controller    (PLC) and human-machine interface (HMI) on the plant floor.  <\/p>\n<p>    All [remote access] solutions give operators complete    situational awareness to everything thats going on with the    factory floor from wherever they arethats whats picked up    steam these last 18 months, says Matt Newton, director of    technical marketing at Opto 22. It lets an operator virtually be present    in their factory without actually having to physically be there    to look at the process.  <\/p>\n<p>    Customers operating a wind turbine farm, for example, can    monitor the speeds of the turbines and the amount of    electricity being produced, and even perform some basic    controls like turning turbines on and off based on market    pricing, Newton explains. In another example, a food    manufacturer can keep tabs on a refrigeration system remotely    to avoid the nightmare scenario of frozen foods melting over    the weekend because there was no on-site visibility into the    system. All around, the concept of connectivity is tapping    into information you didnt have access to before, he says.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to our survey, the most prevalent use case for remote    access is for maintenance, repair, troubleshooting and    diagnostic applications, cited by 60 percent of respondents.    Production monitoring is next in line at 44 percent, and 26    percent of respondents are leveraging the technology to support    manufacturing intelligence applications for plant management    and executives.  <\/p>\n<p>    Though companies are actively embracing remote access, few    anticipate an expanded role for the technology any time soon,    the survey found. Beyond their current use, respondents said    future plans call for putting remote access to work for pretty    much the same types of tasks: maintenance, repair,    troubleshooting and diagnostics (36 percent); production    monitoring (33 percent); and manufacturing intelligence (26    percent). About 22 percent of respondents said they are already    maximizing usage of the technology.  <\/p>\n<p>    Given the most popular applications, the primary users of    remote access technologies remain plant operators, engineers    and technicians, with 65 percent of respondents saying those    positions are involved at their sites. Plant management was    another healthy sized user with 37 percent of respondents    adding them to the list, while third-party engineers (24    percent) and corporate management (22 percent) made up the rest    of the user base.  <\/p>\n<p>    For the most part, manufacturers are leveraging remote access    to deliver more flexibility to personnel and save costs. Two of    the primary motivators for the technology are to reduce the    time and expense involved in physically deploying workers to a    site for problem resolution (cited by 60 percent of survey    respondents) and to reduce downtime (53 percent). Manufacturers    are also tapping the technology to improve knowledge of    production operations and provide better insight into equipment    conditions (42 percent each).  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the primary drivers is eliminating travel costs, says    Keith Blodorn, director of the wireless program at ProSoft    Technology, which provides industrial automation    connectivity solutions. ProSoft Connect is a cloud-native    platform designed to simplify secure remote access to    automation systems. One of our customers recently had to fly    out to a place thats hard to get to, and the plane ticket cost    $1,500 at the last minute. They got there, plugged into the    PLC, found the problem in 10 minutes, but couldnt get a return    flight for three days. That showcases a tangible value for    remote access.  <\/p>\n<p>    In such cases, remote access delivers far better labor    utilization, GEs Wells notes. Instead of each plant    functioning as a self-sustaining entity with a dedicated staff    of automation experts, manufacturers can parlay a single expert    across multiple locations. In the case of extremely remote    locations, remote access can substitute for dedicated experts    to support unmanned operations. As cost pressures increase,    local engineering staff can log in remotely and get the data    they need to provide relevant advice to fix and improve    things, he says.  <\/p>\n<p>    Moreover, the ability to tap into a remote site to gain access    to critical data furnishes manufacturers with a larger data set    for analyzing plant performance. With remote access and the    ability to bring data up into a centralized data store, you    gain greater insight into whats working well and whats not    and can start to identify things that arent obvious in a    single plant, but that you can see in the context of multiple    plants, Wells says. GE Digitals Predix platform is built    around the whole framework of remote connectivity, he adds,    with analysis and optimization applications built on top,    including those assembled into its asset performance management    (APM) suite.  <\/p>\n<p>    Though 34 percent of survey respondents are building their own    remote access systemsprimarily web access to SCADA and HMI    systemsa growing number (41 percent) are leveraging outside    suppliers like GE Digital and others as they integrate expanded    remote access capabilities into their product suites. In terms    of top suppliers of remote access technologies, Rockwell    Automation was the dominant vendor cited by survey    respondents with 25 percent, followed by Siemens (18 percent),    Schneider Electric (13 percent), ABB (11 percent), Honeywell (9    percent), GE Digital (8 percent) and a long list of others.  <\/p>\n<p>    Next stop: IIoT-enabled predictive    maintenance    The bulk of survey respondents have yet to put IIoT-enabled    predictive maintenance applications on their dockets. But    automation providers are expanding their portfolios in this    area nonetheless, anticipating plenty of future demand.    Beckhoff    Automation, for example, recently released its ultra    compact C6015 industrial PC, specifically geared for remote    access applications. Emerson Automation Solutions DeltaV Mobile app    allows process engineers and plant operators and managers to    receive real-time alarm notifications and remotely monitor    their processes from wherever they are located.  <\/p>\n<p>    Moving forward, companies like Rockwell and GE Digital will    lead manufacturers into predictive maintenance applications by    leveraging remote access capabilities along with predictive    analytics tools and IIoT platforms. Most companies starting    down that path have high-impact assets that put a manufacturer    at significant risk due to downtime, notes Umair Masud,    Rockwells product manager for consulting and security    services.  <\/p>\n<p>    If someone has a large compressor or rotating machinery and    that asset is critical to the environment, they are absolutely    invested in understanding the ways in which they can predict    failure, Masud explains. Failure in any one of those areas    can have a large monetary impact from a downtime or    environmental perspective. In contrast, less complex    environments like a food and beverage plant, for example,    typically have redundancy built into their production lines, so    predictive maintenance might not be as business critical, he    adds.  <\/p>\n<p>    Whether its IIoT-enabled predictive maintenance or more    traditional remote access applications for production    monitoring and support, security remains the most significant    concern and primary roadblock for expanding remote access    applications. You are playing with fire when you connect this    stuff, says Opto 22s Newton. If youre connecting    multimillion-dollar equipment to the Internet, its going to    take a lot of educationits still a totally foreign concept to    many.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.automationworld.com\/article\/technologies\/maintenance-reliability\/remote-access-widespread-still-evolving\" title=\"Remote Access: Widespread but Still Evolving - Automation World\">Remote Access: Widespread but Still Evolving - Automation World<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Whether taking a walk down the hall or hopping a flight to some far-flung destination, monitoring plant operations or large assets in the field has traditionally been an on-site role. Thanks to the emergence of remote access technologies, however, the need to be physically present to problem solve or monitor operations is fast becoming a thing of the past <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/automation\/remote-access-widespread-but-still-evolving-automation-world\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187732],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204025"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204025\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}