{"id":203718,"date":"2017-07-05T22:45:36","date_gmt":"2017-07-06T02:45:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/north-koreas-missile-test-gives-trump-his-biggest-challenge-cnn\/"},"modified":"2017-07-05T22:45:36","modified_gmt":"2017-07-06T02:45:36","slug":"north-koreas-missile-test-gives-trump-his-biggest-challenge-cnn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/politically-incorrect\/north-koreas-missile-test-gives-trump-his-biggest-challenge-cnn\/","title":{"rendered":"North Korea&#8217;s missile test gives Trump his biggest challenge &#8211; CNN"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  The North Korean dictator's first successful intercontinental  ballistic missile test on Monday did more than shake up strategic  calculations in the Pacific.<\/p>\n<p>  It presented Trump with his first real test on the global stage  as he flies off to meet far more experienced leaders at the G20  summit in Germany, some of whom are ill-disposed to help him and  don't have the US's best interests at heart.<\/p>\n<p>  It's a trip that will now be judged on Trump's capacity to secure  not just international condemnation of North Korea's actions, but  to advance US efforts to change the strategic calculation in  Pyongyang.<\/p>\n<p>  The mission will test Trump's skill at wielding US power,  building international coalitions behind American foreign policy  goals and framing innovative policy approaches that haven't yet  been tried and that don't fit neatly into the \"America First\"  doctrine that is driving his foreign policy.<\/p>\n<p>    Forget the tweetstorms, slams at \"fake news\" journalists and    morale boosting rallies before crowds who thrill to Trump's    politically incorrect rhetorical blasts.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is what being President is really about.  <\/p>\n<p>    In one sense, the July 4 pyrotechnics from the isolated state    ushered in an alarming new reality, one Trump is the first    President to face -- the prospect that in theory, Pyongyang    could soon hit the US with a nuclear-capable missile.  <\/p>\n<p>    But what makes Trump's job so difficult is the unpalatable set    of options available to try to halt North Korea's nuclear and    missile programs. If those fail, an equally unpleasant option    would await -- accepting the reality the United States is in    Pyongyang's crosshairs.  <\/p>\n<p>    In other words, Trump is under intense pressure to solve what    may be an insoluble foreign policy problem.  <\/p>\n<p>    He would have to decide how to contain the threat from the    North Korean program or to deter the use of a weapon,    effectively accepting that in theory at last Pyongyang had the    US in the crosshairs.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"There is an argument to be made that everything has changed    and nothing has changed,\" said Jim Walsh, senior research    associate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Security    Studies Program, adding that the test had demonstrated new    North Korean capabilities and taken the US across a    psychological and political threshold.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Walsh said the options for the US to respond \"really    haven't changed. Today's options are no different from    yesterday's options, and yesterday's options weren't very    good.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Given that military attempts to halt North Korea's nuclear    march all risk a horrific confrontation that could kill    millions on the Korean peninsula and beyond, Trump has few    alternatives but to seek a diplomatic outcome to the showdown    with Pyongyang.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yet there are few approaches that other presidents have not    already tried.  <\/p>\n<p>    One route the administration is taking is a familiar one --    seeking a Security Council condemnation of the test launch on    Wednesday at the UN and new sanctions on the already heavily    sanctioned North. US and South Korean forces are also    conducting exercises in the region in response to the test.  <\/p>\n<p>    Trump came to office slamming the \"strategic patience\" strategy    pursued by the previous Obama administration on North Korea --    involving tough sanctions and a refusal to talk to Pyongyang    until it renounces nuclear development.  <\/p>\n<p>    But he has yet to diverge substantially from the approach of    the last few administrations.  <\/p>\n<p>    His preferred initial tactic was also a familiar one -- a charm    offensive to convince Chinese President Xi Jinping, whom he    will meet in Germany, to pressure Beijing's recalcitrant    neighbor into halting its nuclear and missile programs.  <\/p>\n<p>    But now the President, only three months after meeting Xi at    his Florida resort, appears to have concluded that effort has    failed, further narrowing his options.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"North Korea has just launched another missile. Does this guy    have anything better to do with his life?\" Trump tweeted after    Monday's launch.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Hard to believe that South Korea and Japan will put up with    this much longer. Perhaps China will put a heavy move on North    Korea and end this nonsense once and for all!\"  <\/p>\n<p>    On Wednesday, Trump added: \"Trade between China and North Korea    grew almost 40% in the first quarter. So much for China working    with us  but we had to give it a try!\"  <\/p>\n<p>    There are differing interpretations as to how much Beijing has    so far done to pressure the North Koreans, following its    decision to halt coal exports to the Stalinist state and a    temporary freeze on oil supplies.  <\/p>\n<p>    And Washington may be overestimating China's capacity to change    the behavior of the volatile North Korean leader.  <\/p>\n<p>    Many experts also believe that China is reluctant to try the    kind of prolonged oil embargo that could really pressure Kim    because of a fear it could collapse his regime and ignite a    chaotic situation on the peninsula. Beijing also has no    interest in a solution that would lead to a unified Korea in    alliance with the US on its borders.  <\/p>\n<p>    Whatever China's motivations, however, it seems unlikely that    its leaders will be swayed by Trump tweets, hence the need for    a prolonged and comprehensive diplomatic push by the    administration starting at the G20.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"This is really a good opportunity for the President to show    leadership, and to show the type of leader he is,\" said Harry    Kazianis, Director of Defense Studies at the Center for the    National Interest, who argued that Trump's tweets were merely a    type of \"strategic signaling\" not the extent of US policy.  <\/p>\n<p>    If Trump's powers of persuasion with other world leaders fall    short, he and his administration will be left with some tough    decisions.  <\/p>\n<p>    One option would be to expand secondary sanctions on Chinese    firms that do business with North Korea to try to tighten an    economic chokehold around Pyongyang.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We really need to focus on the players in China, Chinese    banks. the people that are aiding and abetting the money    laundering,\" said Kazianis, who also advocates stepping up    cybersecurity operations against Pyongyang's missile and    nuclear programs.  <\/p>\n<p>    Widening sanctions on China's firms is a logical next step, one    of the few new approaches that the administration could pursue.  <\/p>\n<p>    But such a move would also create a whole new foreign policy    headache by triggering a sharp deterioration in relations with    China, a scenario that could have unpredictable results and    significantly increase regional tensions in Asia.  <\/p>\n<p>    Another option for Trump -- actually talking to the North    Koreans -- has been tried before, and is problematic, since    Pyongyang has in the past agreed to nuclear freezes and walked    away from the deal. Kim, having watched the demise of other    dictators who gave away their nuclear programs, believes that    his atomic weapons are the only guarantor of his survival.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"They will never give up their nuclear weapons program. They    will never give up their missile program. That discussion is    off the table,\" said Sue Mi Terry, a former CIA North Korea    analyst, on CNN on Wednesday.  <\/p>\n<p>    Whatever path he eventually chooses, it's clear that tough talk    and tweets are unlikely to provide breakthroughs and that    managing escalating tensions will consume the administration    for as long as it is in office.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The main danger here, contrary to some expectations, is not    that North Korea is going to suddenly attack the US,\" Walsh    said. \"The danger is that there will be a war, but it will    happen through miscalculation or misperception.\"  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2017\/07\/05\/politics\/north-koreas-missile-test-gives-trump-his-biggest-challenge\/index.html\" title=\"North Korea's missile test gives Trump his biggest challenge - CNN\">North Korea's missile test gives Trump his biggest challenge - CNN<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The North Korean dictator's first successful intercontinental ballistic missile test on Monday did more than shake up strategic calculations in the Pacific. It presented Trump with his first real test on the global stage as he flies off to meet far more experienced leaders at the G20 summit in Germany, some of whom are ill-disposed to help him and don't have the US's best interests at heart. It's a trip that will now be judged on Trump's capacity to secure not just international condemnation of North Korea's actions, but to advance US efforts to change the strategic calculation in Pyongyang <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/politically-incorrect\/north-koreas-missile-test-gives-trump-his-biggest-challenge-cnn\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politically-incorrect"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203718"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203718"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203718\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}