{"id":203285,"date":"2017-07-04T07:49:14","date_gmt":"2017-07-04T11:49:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/newly-identified-small-rna-fragments-defend-the-genome-when-its-naked-bioscience-technology\/"},"modified":"2017-07-04T07:49:14","modified_gmt":"2017-07-04T11:49:14","slug":"newly-identified-small-rna-fragments-defend-the-genome-when-its-naked-bioscience-technology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/newly-identified-small-rna-fragments-defend-the-genome-when-its-naked-bioscience-technology\/","title":{"rendered":"Newly Identified Small RNA Fragments Defend the Genome When It&#8217;s &#8216;Naked&#8217; &#8211; Bioscience Technology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Our genomes are minefields, studded with potentially damaging    DNA sequences over which hundreds of thousands of sentries    stand guard. These sentries, called epigenetic marks, attach to    the double helix at such spots and prevent the underlying DNA    sequences from springing into destructive action.  <\/p>\n<p>    About half the human genome is composed of these damaging    sequences. They are places where ancient viruses and parasitic    elements called transposons and retrotransposons have    incorporated themselves over the long course of evolution. It's    astonishing, then, to consider that during two of the most    crucial processes in the life cycle, the sentries are removed,    leaving the genome naked. The defenders are quickly welcomed    back, but only after an interval in which the epigenetic slate    is wiped clean.  <\/p>\n<p>    Today in Cell, a team from Cold Spring Harbor    Laboratory (CSHL) describes its discovery of what might be    considered emergency replacements for the sentries, shock    troops pressed into service across the genome only during these    curiously undefended moments. Specifically, these defenders are    protecting the genome in mammalian embryos, at the very early    point in their development before they are implanted in the    wall of the maternal uterus.  <\/p>\n<p>    The preimplantation embryo is one of two normal settings in    which epigenetic marks are wiped clean before being    reinscribed. The other setting is a step in the formation of    germline cells - sperm and eggs -- which have temporary    defenders already known to biology, so-called piwi-interacting    RNAs (piRNAs). The research published today, led by first    author Andrea Schorn, a postdoctoral investigator in the lab of    Rob Martienssen, demonstrates that another species of small RNA    performs an analogous genome-defending role in preimplantation    embryos during an interval of epigenetic reprogramming. Dr.    Martienssen is a CSHL Professor and HHMI-Gordon and Betty Moore    Foundation investigator.  <\/p>\n<p>    The newly identified defenders come in two varieties - RNA    fragments consisting of 18 and 22 nucleotides. These RNA    fragments, Dr. Schorn discovered, are perfect complements of    sequences in retrotransposons that must be engaged in order for    the genomic parasites to be activated.  <\/p>\n<p>    This fact led to the discovery. Schorn scrutinized the contents    of mouse embryonic stem cells and found many free-floating RNA    fragments 18 nucleotides in length. Computer analysis revealed    that their sequences perfectly matched sequences within    transfer RNAs. tRNAs are ubiquitous, and are involved in the    synthesis of proteins. It has been known for decades that tRNAs    are hijacked by long terminal repeat (LTR)-retrotransposons, a    portion of their sequence docking at a primer binding site    (PBS) and initiating a process that activates the genomic    parasite.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Knowing that LTR retrotransposons need tRNAs to replicate, it    was very tempting to believe that these 18-nucleotide tRNA    fragments we were seeing in preimplantation embryonic stem    cells could interfere with that process,\" says Schorn. \"We    think the cell is deliberately chopping up full-length tRNAs    into smaller fragments precisely because both tRNAs and the    fragments cut from them recognize the PBS. This means the    small, tRNA-derived fragments would be able to occupy that site    and inhibit retrotransposon replication and mobility,\"    Martienssen explains.  <\/p>\n<p>    The implications, Martienssen says, are potentially profound.    This appears to tell us one way in which the genomes of mammals    have tolerated vast numbers of transposons and other parasitic    elements, even during periods when the genome is wiped clean of    repressive epigenetic marks. \"It's plausible that this is a    very ancient mechanism that cells have found to not only    inhibit retrotransposons but help in protection against viruses    as well,\" Martienssen says.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.biosciencetechnology.com\/news\/2017\/07\/newly-identified-small-rna-fragments-defend-genome-when-its-naked\" title=\"Newly Identified Small RNA Fragments Defend the Genome When It's 'Naked' - Bioscience Technology\">Newly Identified Small RNA Fragments Defend the Genome When It's 'Naked' - Bioscience Technology<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Our genomes are minefields, studded with potentially damaging DNA sequences over which hundreds of thousands of sentries stand guard. These sentries, called epigenetic marks, attach to the double helix at such spots and prevent the underlying DNA sequences from springing into destructive action.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/newly-identified-small-rna-fragments-defend-the-genome-when-its-naked-bioscience-technology\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203285"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203285\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}