In hisnew biography of Piet Mondrian, Dutch art historian Hans Janssen sets out to abolish the myth of the artist as recluse, ascetic being, and mechanical\/unemotional figure slaving in his studio. Instead, he reveals the true nature of [a] man who embraced life, and was completely fascinated by painting. <\/p>\n
Though Mondrian was, no doubt, a mysterious and elusive man, Janssen endeavors to draw a portrait of the Neo-Plasticist hero as a practical man, lessinfluenced by his belief in Theosophic philosophy or Goerthes color theory than his enjoyment of the company of women, love of music and food, and above all, abilities as an amazing danceran artist with a wholesomejoie de vivre. <\/p>\n
In what is an impressive feat of research and scholarship into the life of Mondrian, Janssen takessome liberties in recounting the painters life, retelling parts of Mondrians story in the form ofvie romance andfictionalizing segments of the famed figures life based on plausible circumstances. <\/p>\n
The most notable example of this may be a scene in which Mondrian is described as attending Josephine Bakers first performance in Paris in 1925down to his disappointment that she didnt dance the Charleston. There is no evidence that he did attend, [but] it is highly likely, notes Janssen.It includes passages like this, an invented dialogue with Henry van Loon in the section: <\/p>\n
And this is the thing, said Mondrian. I hear that there was a young dancer with them, and no one knew what she would be doing. Charles developed a dance sauvage for her. He wanted her to appear scantily clad, or better still, wearing almost nothing, with just some pink feathers here and there, including at her wrists and ankles. That would nicely accentuate the suppleness of her body. She is apparently called Josephine Baker, and she is barely nineteen years old. <\/p>\n
Nevertheless, Janssens biography of the Dutch master is riveting and eloquent. Here aresome of the tidbitsabout Janssens new, earthy Mondriangiven in this 625-page tome (120 pages of which were translated from its original, and form the basis of this article). <\/p>\n
Piet Mondrian in his studio with (top) Lozenge Composition with Four Yellow Lines (1933) and (bottom) Composition with Double Lines and Yellow (1934). Paris, October 1933. Collection RKD, Netherlands Institute for Art History. Photo credit Charles Karsten. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
At the tail end of WWI, Mondrian lived in Laren, Holland, and would travel from his home to his studio near Noolsewegevery day by bicycle (thats where he made Composition With Gray Lines of 1919). The book starts out, quite emphatically, by stating that Mondrian always enjoyed the bicycle ride, even when the weather was not good. <\/p>\n
Granted, for a Dutchman, this is perhaps not so surprising. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Piet Mondrian, Composition with Grey Lines, 1918, oil on canvas. Courtesy Gemeentemuseum Den Haag. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Janssen makes an interesting case about the origins of his path-breaking art concepts: <\/p>\n
Mondrians literal interpretationof reality was also reflected in his interest in the literal meaning of words, which may have been prompted by a mild form of dyslexia. His peculiar use of language resulted from this interest: plastic means, bringing to determination, abolition of position and proportion. Such terms and phrases, as he used them in Dutch, were the outcome of his tendency to take words literally. <\/p>\n
Mondrian wroteextensively for friend and fellow painter Theo von Doesburgs journalDe Stijl.Through these writings, Mondrian would then come up with theories of a new plastic, or Neo-Plasticism. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Starting in1910 (and perhaps before), Mondrian worked as an assistant to Professor Reindert Pieter van Calcar (18721957) at Leiden University in the Netherlands. As a way to make money during a time of uncertainty in his art practice, the artist would draw bacteriological specimens in the laboratory for the professor. Van Calcar specialized in cholera and performed a lot of quantitative and experimental research. Between 1901 and 1920, researchers at Leiden were awarded three Nobel Prizes. Janssen argues Mondrians experience working at Leiden University had a tremendous influence on theoretical breakthroughs in paintinga strategy of looking, measuring, and experimenting with nature. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Mondrian has grown up to become a painter, but the need to expose the essence has induced him to seriously consider becoming a church minister, or a conductor, writes Janssen, though in general, the bookmakes an effort to downplay Mondrians interests in Theosophy and mysticism. But the artist was very much into spirituality. Although Mondrian developed a scientific method or approach to art making, hewas convinced that the creative process was directed and led by the intuitive, and driven by unknown forces. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
In 1918, Mondrian contracted the Spanish flu, an epidemic that took more lives than the Great War itself, with deaths ranging from 50 to 100 million. It is believed that Mondrian caught the disease from his housemate Jo Steijling (18791973), a primary school teacher who was very close to the artist. Mondrianssymptoms continued for months. By December 1918 tens of thousands of people died of the influenza alone. Throughout this time, he continued to work on his paintings in his studioand this may have helped his art. <\/p>\n
As he wrote to a friend in 1929, While I have had the flu I have noticed how concentrated one unwillingly becomes, and that the work is the better for it. <\/p>\n
Piet Mondrian,Victory Boogie Woogie (1944). Courtesy the Gemeentemuseum. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
After WWI, Mondrian returned to Paris where the city was slowly becoming a hotbed for creativity, experimentation, and partyinghe was huge fan of the Paris nightclub scene and frequented theboteswhenever possible. However, while in Paris, his lack of success gave him severe doubts, and made him think about finding a job as a waiter or a grape picker. Janseen notes: <\/p>\n
From January 1920 he toyed continually with idea of throwing in the towel and going to live with his friend Ritsema van Eck, who had offered him accommodation in the south of France.You understand, he [Mondrian]wrote, that once I am convinced that it will be financially viable because of N.P. [neo-plastic] work, I shall be off. I shall simply pick olives in the South. I can earn 12 fr. [francs] a day there, and people live off that. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
It is probably well known that Mondrian was a great jazz fan, and was obsessed with how people danced to the music, regularly going to clubs in Paris during the 1920s. What is perhaps not common knowledge is that the artist was also a fan of noise music. <\/p>\n
In June 1921 artist Luigi Russolo premiered his performanceBruiteurs Futuristesat the Thatre des Champs-Elyses in Paris. Russolo created instruments he calledintonarumori, apparatuses that produced acoustic noises that were reflected in their names: screechers, growlers, cracklers, bleepers, cluckers, poppers, howlers, croakers. Although we dont know for sure if Mondrian actually attended Russolo performance in Paris, Janssen notes that he wrotea lengthy article forDe Stijldetailing how theintonarumoriallowed the creation for purely abstract form of music. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
During his time in Paris, Mondrian often complained about having a lack of money, since he couldnt sell his painting. This fits with his artistic rep for austere, rationalistic abstraction, but it was far from being true. <\/p>\n
Not only did he have support from friends like Ritsema van Eck and Jo Steijling who both bought paintings from the artist, he also had fairly affordable rent. The issue was that Mondrian was not very good with money and lived a somewhat lavish lifestyle: He enjoyed the finer things in life, and most of all loved going out to best restaurants in town: Mondrian knew all the restaurants where one could eat well. <\/p>\n
In attempt to be frugal, Mondrian started cooking from home and found that he ate much better and more cheaply, but alas, he felt that his social was in the outs, finding himself at home and in the studio at all hours of the day. <\/p>\n
Piet Mondrian with Broadway Boogie Woogie, New York, 1943. Photo by Fritz Glarner. Courtesy the Collection RKD Netherlands Institute for Art History. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Despite the image ofMondrian as a solitary, hermit of a man, he actually did enjoy the company of women. He would take women out on walks, to restaurants, and out dancing to clubs. As Janssen puts it in his book, he had an uncomplicated interest in women, one that was unusually intense but at the same time enlightened and honourable. He was also highly attractive to women, He lived simply, but took pleasure in the finer things in life. <\/p>\n
Just how enlightened and honourable was he? He hadan affair with the much younger Lily Bles (19091982), the daughter of Dutch poet Dop Bles (18831940). In 1929 Dop and his daughter, who was a much, much younger 19 at the time (Mondrian was 57), came to visit Paris and stayed with Mondrian. Dop and Mondrian had known each other for some time and were good friends. Mondrian and Lily continued their affair for years. Mondrian asked for Lilys hand in marriage, but in a letter she wrote to him in 1932, Lily denied his request because she was looking for someone her own age. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Maybe one Mondrians best known secrets is his passion for dance. The painter enjoyed going out dancing with friends and took dance classes all throughout his life. And, according to Janssen, the dance enthusiast was obsessed with the Charleston, a popular dance movement in the United States during 1920s, named after the city in South Carolina. <\/p>\n
Mondrian was drawn to the dance for its connection to jazz and visual and rhythmic aspects. All over the world, however, the dance was frowned upon because it was viewed as immoral, lude, and overtly sexual. As Janssen puts it, Moondrian felt compelled, in 1926, to give an interview to the Dutch press threatening never to return to the Netherlands if the ban on the Charleston was enforced. <\/p>\n
Piet Mondrian: A New Art for a Life Unknown (Hollands Diep, 2017) was published just before the opening of Mondrian to Dutch Design: 100 Years of De Stijl an exhibition celebrating centennial anniversary ofthe founding of the art movement. The show is on view at the Gemeentemuseum in Holland, through September 24, 2017. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Go here to see the original:<\/p>\n
1. MONDRIAN LOVED TO BIKE - artnet News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In hisnew biography of Piet Mondrian, Dutch art historian Hans Janssen sets out to abolish the myth of the artist as recluse, ascetic being, and mechanical\/unemotional figure slaving in his studio. Instead, he reveals the true nature of [a] man who embraced life, and was completely fascinated by painting. Though Mondrian was, no doubt, a mysterious and elusive man, Janssen endeavors to draw a portrait of the Neo-Plasticist hero as a practical man, lessinfluenced by his belief in Theosophic philosophy or Goerthes color theory than his enjoyment of the company of women, love of music and food, and above all, abilities as an amazing danceran artist with a wholesomejoie de vivre. Continue reading