{"id":203153,"date":"2017-07-03T08:00:28","date_gmt":"2017-07-03T12:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech-analysis-and-significance\/"},"modified":"2017-07-03T08:00:28","modified_gmt":"2017-07-03T12:00:28","slug":"freedom-of-speech-analysis-and-significance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/freedom-of-speech-analysis-and-significance\/","title":{"rendered":"Freedom of Speech Analysis and Significance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Imagine a life where you had no freedom to speak what was on    your mind, and imagine what it would be like to live in a world    like this. Noam Chomsky, a linguistics professor at the    Massachusetts Institute of Technology is a big     supporter with the    idea of free speech. He is known across the globe for his    activism and outspoken criticism. He is also said to be the    most often cited living author and one of the most respected    and influential intellectuals in the world. (MinnesotaState)    Chomsky is very respected in the area of free speech, which is    why so many people criticize him as well, because he does have    some extreme forms of free speech which he thinks how it should    be. To show the view Chomsky has, there is one very extreme    example of what he thinks should be allowed in society today.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the year 1979, a French professor of Literature named Robert    Faurisson published two letters in Le    Monde. These letters had statements about    how gas chambers used by the Nazis in World War 2 to get rid of    people of the Jewish faith did not exist. After publishing    these letters, there was a huge outrage almost worldwide.    Faurisson was convicted for Defamation and also fined and given    a prison sentence. A man by the name of Serge Thion, a French    Libertarian socialist and Holocaust denier ask Noam Chomsky to    sign a petition along with hundreds of other people who signed    it to support Faurissons right to freedom of speech. After    Chomsky had signed the petition, people were already attacking    him. Jewish-French historian, Pierre Vidal-Naquet saw this    petition to be a legitimization of Faurissons denial of the    Holocaust and also as a misrepresentation of his intentions.    Because Chomsky signed the petition, he also wrote an essay    called Some Elementary Comments on The Rights of Freedom of    Expression which was very critical of the French intellectual    response. This also stated that Chomsky did not support    Faurissons ideas but strictly his right to freedom to speech.    This essay however was used by Faurisson in his book which    intended to defend his rather obscure views. Vidal-Naquet    attacked Chomsky in his essay and thinks Chomsky could have    signed other petitions defending the right to freedom of speech    without presenting Faurisson as a legitimate historian. Chomsky    has stated that he believes in the absolute freedom of speech    and also states I see no anti-Semitic implications in the    denial of the existence of gas chambers or even the denial of    the Holocaust. (CriticismsWiki)  <\/p>\n<p>    A question that can be raised from all this is, can Chomskys    understanding of free speech be allowed in todays society? The    answer is yes it can be allowed, and should be allowed.    Everyday people are discriminated by other people because of    what they think and what their opinions are on different    topics. If someone doesnt agree with something you say or    think, that shouldnt mean you should not have the right to    express yourself. Although sometimes it could be dangerous    depending on the topic your arguing or talking about, because    there are some people in the society today that think there is    only one side to things. Faurisson was a Holocaust denier, and    even though many people disagreed with him and his ideas, they    supported his right to speak what was on his mind and get his    opinions across. The fact that he was considered anti-Semitic    and given a fine and sentence in prison is ridiculous. He is    not hurting anyone when he is doing his own research and trying    to look for alternative sources and opinions. By not knowing    all opinions and narrowing your knowledge on all topics, you    cant really make a reasonable decision on what you think is    right without knowing both sides. After 9\/11 there were many    opinions expressed that didnt agree with each other, and the    ones that the Americans didnt like were somehow in some shape    or form put aside, ignored, or penalized for having a different    thought than the majority of the population. It might take some    adjusting and such to get used to the absolute freedom of    speech, but without it were shielding ourselves from other    ideas that could prove to be good and interesting as well. If    two people were to get into a fight at a school, and no    witnesss were around to see it, the principle would listen to    both sides most likely before making a decision and what he or    she believes. This can be related to the idea of free speech,    and Chomskys understanding of it, in which if you dont hear    both sides of things, how can you make an honest decision on    whats right and wrong, or what should be or shouldnt be.  <\/p>\n<p>    The world would be a much different place if people werent    allowed to express their thoughts and were only given stuff to    think about, instead of actually looking into things and    understanding the whole situation. Without Freedom of speech    many great philosophers and other great beings would not have    made a difference in the world. Martin Luther King Jr.    Expressed his thoughts and made a difference to millions of    people for the better, even when at the time many of thousands    of people did not agree with him and were actually mad at him.    Same thing with Bob Marley, he spoke his mind and how everyone    should get along and be able to express themselves, even after    getting shot at he still stood by what he believed. There are    so many examples where individuals around the world made a    difference by speaking up and questioning things even when    people frowned apon it. Without this freedom, society would be    very dull and probably not as harmonized as it could be.    Chomskys understanding might be extreme, but with a little    effort, it could be allowed in our society today and good would    come from it.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/schoolworkhelper.net\/freedom-of-speech-analysis-and-significance\/\" title=\"Freedom of Speech Analysis and Significance\">Freedom of Speech Analysis and Significance<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Imagine a life where you had no freedom to speak what was on your mind, and imagine what it would be like to live in a world like this. Noam Chomsky, a linguistics professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is a big supporter with the idea of free speech. He is known across the globe for his activism and outspoken criticism <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/freedom-of-speech-analysis-and-significance\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162383],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom-of-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203153"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203153\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}