{"id":202952,"date":"2017-07-02T08:48:33","date_gmt":"2017-07-02T12:48:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/dna-test-could-alter-mans-life-sentence-grand-junction-daily-sentinel\/"},"modified":"2017-07-02T08:48:33","modified_gmt":"2017-07-02T12:48:33","slug":"dna-test-could-alter-mans-life-sentence-grand-junction-daily-sentinel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/dna-test-could-alter-mans-life-sentence-grand-junction-daily-sentinel\/","title":{"rendered":"DNA test could alter man&#8217;s life sentence &#8211; Grand Junction Daily Sentinel"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    By    Gabrielle Porter    Saturday, July 1, 2017  <\/p>\n<p>    New DNA testing is underway in a decades-old murder case after    post-conviction lawyers for Verle James Mangum won the right to    re-examine evidence used at his 2003 murder trial.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mangum was convicted at trial of bludgeoning to death Clifton    resident Janet Davis, 42, and her 11-year-old daughter,    Jennifer, in 1996. He was 17 at the time of the murder and was    sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.  <\/p>\n<p>    Garfield County District Judge James Boyd ruled in November to    order new testing after a series of arguments from defense    attorneys Erin Wilson of Steamboat Springs and Kathleen McGuire    of Denver. Prosecutors opposed the move.  <\/p>\n<p>    We resisted (new testing), and in large part we did that    because the conviction itself really wasnt based on DNA, said    Chief Deputy District Attorney David Waite, adding that    Mangums conviction was based on his own confession to two    friends.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wilson and McGuire wrote in motions filed with Boyd that    Mangums confession was unreliable.  <\/p>\n<p>    The statements made by Mr. Mangum were and are wholly    unreliable given their content and the circumstances    surrounding Mr. Mangums development and life experiences at    the time the statements were made. Yet nothing related to Mr.    Mangums development or life circumstances was ever    investigated by his trial counsel or presented to the jury,    the motion said. ... Expert testimony can and would explain    how a young person could do what is almost unthinkable in the    mind of an adult  falsely confess to committing two murders    (to friends).  <\/p>\n<p>    Wilson and McGuire also argued that new and better technology    is now available to test and retest certain pieces of evidence,    and that Mangums trial lawyers mistakenly believed his DNA had    been found on a comforter in Davis home.  <\/p>\n<p>    Waite said that Boyd ultimately, I think in an abundance of    caution, granted their motion for post-conviction DNA testing.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wilson and McGuire declined to speak publicly about the case.  <\/p>\n<p>    The newly ordered DNA testing is only the latest chapter in    Mangums long and labyrinthine case.  <\/p>\n<p>    Davis and her daughter Jennifer were found dead in their    Clifton home on Feb. 15, 1996. Prosecutors initially filed    murder charges against Davis husband, Jennifers father, which    they dropped in 1997.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mangum was arrested only after confessing to the crime. Despite    the confession, he pleaded not guilty and was convicted by a    jury in 2003.  <\/p>\n<p>    Prosecutors asserted at trial that Mangum killed Davis after    she caught him having sex with her young daughter while high on    methamphetamine. He killed Jennifer as a witness, they said.  <\/p>\n<p>    He was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of    parole.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the years after Mangums conviction, Colorado lawmakers took    steps to prevent life sentences for juveniles with the passage    of a 2006 law. The law also established that juveniles    convicted of murder must be considered for parole after serving    40 years in prison; however, it was not made retroactive after    family members of victims raised concerns, so Mangum was not    considered for re-sentencing.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Colorado Court of Appeals in 2007 affirmed Mangums Mesa    County trial convictions.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court decided life sentences without    the possibility for parole were unconstitutional for juveniles,    even in cases where the juvenile is convicted as an adult.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2016, the high court added to that ruling, deciding that it    should be applied to inmates who were sentenced before the 2012    decision, effectively tossing Mangums life sentence.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wilson and McGuire wrote in motions that the re-sentencing    issue is on hold until the DNA testing is complete.  <\/p>\n<p>    Also still pending is a motion Mangum has made asserting that    his attorneys  including Richard Gurley, now a Mesa County    district judge  provided ineffective counsel during his first    trial. Mangums case has been moved to Garfield County.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continued here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.gjsentinel.com\/news\/articles\/dna-test-could-alter-mans-life-sentence\" title=\"DNA test could alter man's life sentence - Grand Junction Daily Sentinel\">DNA test could alter man's life sentence - Grand Junction Daily Sentinel<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By Gabrielle Porter Saturday, July 1, 2017 New DNA testing is underway in a decades-old murder case after post-conviction lawyers for Verle James Mangum won the right to re-examine evidence used at his 2003 murder trial.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/dna-test-could-alter-mans-life-sentence-grand-junction-daily-sentinel\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202952","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202952"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202952"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202952\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202952"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}