Campus police said they had very specific intelligence regarding threats that could pose a grave danger to the speaker, attendees and those who may wish to lawfully protest the event, according to court documents. <\/p>\n
The university proposed an alternate date for the Coulter event, but the College Republicans noted it was during Dead Week when few students would be on campus, and that Coulter had only signed onto the initial plan. They said UC Berkeley had canceled the event, violating their free speech rights and discriminating against conservatives. <\/p>\n
In the new response, UC Berkeley begged to differ: Plaintiffs First Amendment free speech claim fails because the relevant venues were limited public forums and the alleged restrictions were reasonable and viewpoint neutral. <\/p>\n
The university also laid out the process it plans to follow to create a new campus event policy. The administration will seek extensive input from the public and student groups, the response said. <\/p>\n
On Thursday, Young Americas Foundation released a statement on UC Berkeleys response, calling it bizarre. <\/p>\n
Berkeleys response laughably alleges that its actions welcoming prominent liberals, including Maria Echaveste, a top aide to President Bill Clinton and Vicente Fox Quesada the former president of Mexico, while simultaneously denying equal access for students attempting to host David Horowitz and Ann Coulterare viewpoint neutral,' the statement said. <\/p>\n
The organization also criticized Cals plan to develop an event policy with input from the public. <\/p>\n
The very idea that a free speech policy is open to discussion or negotiation is absurd. UC-Berkeley administrators should base any policies protecting students constitutional rights on the Constitution itself, the statement said. <\/p>\n
The conservative groups, represented by attorneyHarmeet K. Dhillon, filed their suit against UC President Janet Napolitano, Chancellor Nicholas Dirks, UCPD Captain Alex Yao and other Cal officials in U.S. District Court in Northern California in April. The groups are asking fora jury trial, an injunction stopping UC Berkeley from restricting the exercise of political expression on the UC Berkeley campus, and damages for attorney fees.A court date is set for August 25. <\/p>\n
Amid the tension between the conservative groups and Cal officials, Coulter threatened to come to Berkeley anyway on the initially proposed date, April 27, implying she would speak outdoors. She did not end up coming, saying the students who had supported her had failed to guarantee her safety. <\/p>\n
UC Berkeley set up barricades around Sproul Plaza that day, and UCPD turned out in force. Little action ended up occurring on campus, but members of the far-right, including many who came from out of town, held a free speech rally in Martin Luther King Jr. Civic Center Park. The event was peaceful, in large part because counter-demonstrators did not show up to confront the protesters, except for a brief interaction between anti-fascists and the far-right at the end of the day. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the original post here: Campus police said they had very specific intelligence regarding threats that could pose a grave danger to the speaker, attendees and those who may wish to lawfully protest the event, according to court documents. The university proposed an alternate date for the Coulter event, but the College Republicans noted it was during Dead Week when few students would be on campus, and that Coulter had only signed onto the initial plan Continue reading
\nUC Berkeley says free speech lawsuit is unfounded - Berkeleyside<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"