The North Carolina legislature is the counter-argument against the story of the mule and the two-by-four. No matter how often you hit them over the head, and various courts have done it 12 times in the past year, you still don't get their attention. Sometimes, the mule is just dumb. <\/p>\n
Getty <\/p>\n
From there, we skip up to Wisconsin, where the state's university system remains stubbornly unimpressed with the Republican legislature and with the leadership of Scott Walker, the goggle-eyed homunculus hired by Koch Industries to manage this particular Midwest subsidiary. You may have been following the various fights on college campuses regarding \"controversial\" speakers and the reaction against them. (If you're a regular reader of right-wing media, you believe that mere anarchy has been loosed upon the world. Just lie down with a cold compress for a while.) There are \"free speech\" advocates on both sides of the big ditch here, exercising their First Amendment rights at the top of their lungs and, occasionally, exercising their First Amendment right of assembly in a fashion thought to be too vigorous. <\/p>\n
Luckily, the Wisconsin Republicans have a solution: Throw out the latter group. From The Capital Times: <\/p>\n
The controversial legislation has drawn criticism from those who say it would curb free speech rather than expand it and that it would stand in the way of the UW System's authority to manage its own campuses. Its supporters say its goal is to encourage free expression and to ensure all viewpoints can be heard at public universities. \"Today we are ensuring that simply because you are a young adult on a college campus, your constitutional rights do not go away,\" said bill author Rep. Jesse Kremer, R-Kewaskum. <\/p>\n
Watch now as Kremer deftly ties his own shoes together. <\/p>\n
Under the measure, students who repeatedly engage in \"violent or other disorderly conduct that materially and substantially disrupts the free expression of others\" would be subjected to discipline that, on a third incident, would result in expulsion. The bill requires UW System campuses to launch investigations and hold hearings the second time a student is alleged to have interfered with the expressive rights of others. The hearings and their outcomes would be reported annually to a newly formed Council on Free Expression. <\/p>\n
You see the joker in the deck there, right? \"Other disorderly conduct.\" As defined by what\"a Council On Free Expression.\" <\/p>\n
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below <\/p>\n
A what? Thought police! Somebody wake up Ben Shapiro. There's work to be done in Madison! Of course, Wisconsin is not the only test case. <\/p>\n
Rep. Terese Berceau, D-Madison, said the country has faced free speech struggles throughout its history, but they have been resolved without legislative intervention. \"This is really part of a political program,\" Berceau said. \"It's part of the continuing effort to really establish a conservative stronghold in our country on every institution, and now they're going after or universities.\" The bill is similar to others being considered throughout the country, modeled after sample legislation prepared by the conservative Goldwater Institute, and takes some pieces from a provision members of the Legislature's Joint Finance Committee removed from Gov. Scott Walker's budget proposal. <\/p>\n
Of all the techniques of artificial victimization common to modern conservatism, the whole \"political correctness\" thing is one of the most threadbare, and this attempt at legislating away the parts of the First Amendment you don't like is the best evidence of that we've seen in a while. <\/p>\n
And we conclude, as is our custom, in the great state of Oklahoma, where Blog Official Derelict Oil Well Artist Friedman of the Plains brings us the tale of Rogers County Sheriff Scott Walton, who is not working and playing well with others, as the Tulsa World explains. <\/p>\n
The telephone exchange stemmed from a May 25 incident in which a deputy with the Rogers County Sheriff's Office drove past Officer Craig Heatherly, who attempted to flag down the deputy for backup in a gun-related traffic stop, according to an internal police email. However, dash cam video allegedly shows the deputy driving past without stopping to help In the cellphone audio, Walton can be heard telling Heatherly that he \"handled it wrong\" and he \"owe(d) the man an apology\" in reference to the deputy. Heatherly responded that he and Walton would have to \"agree to disagree on that one.\" \"We'll agree to disagree,\" Walton said, \"but I do agree that you're a f---- coward. OK.\" <\/p>\n
I have to agree with FOTP here. What makes it art is \"We'll have to agree to disagreeyou fcking coward!\" From NPR to Deadwood in one complex sentence. Awesome. <\/p>\n
This is your democracy, America. Cherish it. <\/p>\n
The Constitution Simply Was Not Built for This <\/p>\n
Respond to this post on the Esquire Politics Facebook page. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The rest is here: The North Carolina legislature is the counter-argument against the story of the mule and the two-by-four. No matter how often you hit them over the head, and various courts have done it 12 times in the past year, you still don't get their attention. Continue reading
\nFirst Amendment Battle Brewing in Wisconsin - Esquire - Esquire.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"