{"id":200914,"date":"2017-06-23T06:42:55","date_gmt":"2017-06-23T10:42:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/london-theater-review-topical-drama-terror-variety\/"},"modified":"2017-06-23T06:42:55","modified_gmt":"2017-06-23T10:42:55","slug":"london-theater-review-topical-drama-terror-variety","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ayn-rand\/london-theater-review-topical-drama-terror-variety\/","title":{"rendered":"London Theater Review: Topical Drama &#8216;Terror&#8217; &#8211; Variety"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Stage trials are nothing new. Ayn Rand had a    big Broadway hit with one back in 1935:    Night of January 16was designed to put her    philosophy, individualism, to the test. Ferdinand von    Schirachs Terror, already a commercial success in Germany, does much the    same: It tests the mettle of our morality with a very    contemporary dilemma. In the wake of recent attacks it should    feel essential. Instead, its largely academic.  <\/p>\n<p>    Major Lars Koch (Ashley Zhangazha) of the German air force sits    in a courtroom, a blank stare on his face, accused of 164    counts of murder. Eight months ago, he downed a hijacked    passenger jet that was, in all likelihood, heading for a    football stadium and its capacity crowd. In launching an    air-to-air guided missile, disobeying orders to do so, he saved    up to 70,000 lives. The law, however, states he must face trial    for the lives his actions ended.  <\/p>\n<p>    The question, broadly speaking, is whether it is ever    justifiable to take one life in order to save others. Emma    Fieldings prosecuting lawyer blithely argues that the    constitutions owes each and every one of us our human dignity,    only for the defense (an ardent Forbes Masson) to parry with    the common sense argument: Koch committed the lesser evil; any    of us would have done the same. Tanya Moodie presides over both    with a firm judicial authority.  <\/p>\n<p>    Von Schirach ensures the case is far from open and shut,    carefully constructing a scenario that pulls in several    directions at once. Details complicate the picture  the    indecision of Kochs commanding officers, the passengers    struggling to get into the cockpit  but so do emotions. Events    are described with painstaking precision, right down to the    four passengers sucked out of the blast holes. A dead mans    wife describes collecting his shoe from the witness box. Were    not just asked to decide between absolutism and relativism, but    between action and consequences, intervention and inaction,    individual and state.  <\/p>\n<p>    Terror lets us into the legal system  not just to witness    the judicial process, but to experience it. We stand in the    shoes of jurors, but no matter how seriously one takes the    role, each of us, inevitably, falls short. Theres too much    information to process, too much at stake to completely detach.    Some details snag, others escape you. Its impossible not to    tune into emotions  to project remorse onto Zhangazhas    steadfast certainty, to suspect the prosecution of welling up.    How much are you swayed by rhetoric over facts? How much are    you persuaded by a soft-spoken woman arguing against a brusque    Scottish bloke? The decision, when it comes, comes from the    gut, no more or less rational than the pilots pull on the    trigger.  <\/p>\n<p>    If anything, however, the conundrum is too carefully    constructed, calibrated to hang in perfect balance. It makes a    fun thought-experiment, a riddlesome mind game or an    undergraduate ethics seminar, but, as effective theater, its    hard to shake the artifice of it all. Youre constantly aware    of Von Schirachs manipulating hand. The moment you step back,    you see through it. Nothings really at stake here. We are,    essentially, deliberating over hypothetical hypotheticals.  <\/p>\n<p>    The ending  the judgment, handed down by the audience  blows    it. This being a trial, our decision stands. The judge has to    defer, and the verdict goes into law. Whether we find the    defendant guilty or not, we are, in effect, congratulated on    making the right decision. Terror never holds us to account.    It never unpicks the ramifications of our verdict, nor examines    what that might say about our society. After eight previews,    every verdicts been the same: not guilty. Thats huge. It    means accepting the idea of self-sacrifice, and that the law    can be bent to the circumstances. Terror lets us off    scot-free.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lyric Hammersmith, London; 550 seats; 35 ($45) top.    Opened,June 22, 2017reviewed June 20, 2016. Running    time:1 HOURS, 55 MIN.  <\/p>\n<p>    A Lyric Hammersmith production of a play in two acts by    Ferdinand von Schirach.  <\/p>\n<p>    Directed by Sean Holmes; Set design,Anna    Fleische;translated by David Tushingham; lighting, Joshua    Carr; sound, Nick Manning; costume design, Loren Elstein.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ashley Zhangazaha, Emma Fielding, John Lightbody, Forbes    Masson, Tanya Moodie, Shanaya Rafaat.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continued here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/variety.com\/2017\/legit\/reviews\/terror-review-play-1202476240\/\" title=\"London Theater Review: Topical Drama 'Terror' - Variety\">London Theater Review: Topical Drama 'Terror' - Variety<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Stage trials are nothing new.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ayn-rand\/london-theater-review-topical-drama-terror-variety\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187828],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ayn-rand"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200914"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200914"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200914\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}