{"id":200837,"date":"2017-06-23T06:23:34","date_gmt":"2017-06-23T10:23:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/relatives-of-eugenics-victims-opt-not-to-appeal-to-nc-supreme-court-winston-salem-journal\/"},"modified":"2017-06-23T06:23:34","modified_gmt":"2017-06-23T10:23:34","slug":"relatives-of-eugenics-victims-opt-not-to-appeal-to-nc-supreme-court-winston-salem-journal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/eugenics\/relatives-of-eugenics-victims-opt-not-to-appeal-to-nc-supreme-court-winston-salem-journal\/","title":{"rendered":"Relatives of eugenics victims opt not to appeal to NC Supreme Court &#8211; Winston-Salem Journal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Relatives of eugenics victims have opted not to appeal to the      N.C. Supreme Court a ruling that denies some of them the      ability to inherit payment as heirs.    <\/p>\n<p>      An N.C. Court of Appeals panel ruled June 6 that eugenics      victims seeking compensation from the state had to be alive      on June 30, 2013, for their heirs to qualify for payment      following a relatives death.    <\/p>\n<p>      The Winston-Salem Journal series on eugenics in 2002,      Against Their Will, brought awareness to the states      program, which sterilized about 7,600 people before it ended      in 1974.    <\/p>\n<p>      The three-judge panel unanimously upheld the denials by the      N.C. Industrial Commission related to compensation      established by the Republican-controlled General Assembly in      2013.    <\/p>\n<p>      The June 30, 2013, date was set in the law, which created a      $10 million pool for compensation payments.    <\/p>\n<p>      Our clients have decided not to seek further review by the      N.C. Supreme Court, Elizabeth Haddix, senior staff attorney      for UNC Center for Civil Rights, said Thursday.    <\/p>\n<p>      Although the forced sterilization of their loved ones hurt      them personally and impacted their lives forever, their goal      has always been to honor their loved ones, whose most      fundamental rights were violated by the states 40-year      eugenics program.    <\/p>\n<p>      They have honored them with these appeals, Haddix said.    <\/p>\n<p>      At least 213 victims are considered by the commission to have      qualified for compensation, and they received two partial      checks  $20,000 in October 2014 and $15,000 in November      2015.    <\/p>\n<p>      A third and final payment is to be made after all appeals      have been decided. It is not clear whether that stage has      been reached.    <\/p>\n<p>      Lawsuits were filed by the estates of three eugenics victims       Hughes, Redmond and Smith, whose first names were not      listed in the filings. The plaintiffs claimed the deadline      for qualification was unconstitutional on its face because      it arbitrarily denied compensation to the heirs of some      victims while allowing compensation to others.    <\/p>\n<p>      The appellate judges said in their ruling that state law does      not treat heirs of living victims differently than it treats      heirs of deceased victims. Instead, it said, heirs of victims      are treated differently than the victims themselves.    <\/p>\n<p>      The commission denied the claims in April and May 2015. The      Appeals Court ruled in February 2016 that it lacked the      jurisdiction to address the constitutional challenge.    <\/p>\n<p>      In March, the state Supreme Court sent the case back to the      Appeals Court to consider the constitutional challenge.    <\/p>\n<p>      The panel ruled June 6 we cannot agree that the state law      violated the plaintiffs rights to equal protection under the      law.    <\/p>\n<p>      Victims who, before June 30, 2013, were determined to be      qualified and have a vested interest in compensation would      have their compensation rights passed on to heirs.    <\/p>\n<p>      Qualified victims were required to submit compensation forms      to the commission by June 30, 2014, and 780 of a potential      2,000 living victims did.    <\/p>\n<p>      The panel lists 250 claims as having been approved by the      commission, with a handful awaiting final resolution on      appeal.    <\/p>\n<p>      At that rate, the compensation per approved claim would be in      the $40,000 range, about $10,000 short of the recommended      goal in the initial eugenics compensation legislation.    <\/p>\n<p>      There is nothing in the preamble indicating that the General      Assembly intended to compensate the heirs of individuals who      had been sterilized under the authority of the eugenics      board, according to the panel ruling.    <\/p>\n<p>      In 2002, Gov. Mike Easley apologized for the sterilizations,      but it took another decade for lawmakers to set up the      compensation program.    <\/p>\n<p>      In October 2016, President Barack Obama signed a law      preventing any such compensation from being used to deny      need-based assistance to the victims. The bipartisan      legislation was introduced by U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.),      who led the N.C. compensation program while state House      speaker.    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.journalnow.com\/news\/elections\/local\/relatives-of-eugenics-victims-opt-not-to-appeal-to-n\/article_b3885324-f730-5884-b8f9-fc282c113e79.html\" title=\"Relatives of eugenics victims opt not to appeal to NC Supreme Court - Winston-Salem Journal\">Relatives of eugenics victims opt not to appeal to NC Supreme Court - Winston-Salem Journal<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Relatives of eugenics victims have opted not to appeal to the N.C. Supreme Court a ruling that denies some of them the ability to inherit payment as heirs. An N.C <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/eugenics\/relatives-of-eugenics-victims-opt-not-to-appeal-to-nc-supreme-court-winston-salem-journal\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187750],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200837","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eugenics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200837"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200837"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200837\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200837"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200837"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200837"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}