{"id":200128,"date":"2017-06-21T03:58:50","date_gmt":"2017-06-21T07:58:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/scotus-rules-in-favor-of-free-speech-patriot-post\/"},"modified":"2017-06-21T03:58:50","modified_gmt":"2017-06-21T07:58:50","slug":"scotus-rules-in-favor-of-free-speech-patriot-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/scotus-rules-in-favor-of-free-speech-patriot-post\/","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Free Speech &#8211; Patriot Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Thomas Gallatin  Jun. 20,  2017<\/p>\n<p>    The Supreme Court ruled in an unanimous 8-0 decision Monday to    strike down the Patent and Trademark Offices denial of    trademark for an offensive band name. The case in question was    brought by the Asian-American band The Slants, who had been    denied a trademark on the basis that their name was deemed    disparaging and offensive. The government argued that    trademarks did not fall under First Amendment protections of    free speech because they werent private speech  in fact, that    a trademark is government sanctioned speech. Therefore, the    government argued, when the government reviews trademark    applications it is free to deny granting them based on what it    deems offensive or disparaging.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thankfully, the Supreme Court correctly saw the governments    contorted rationale for what it was  a justification to deny    freedom of speech. Justice Samuel Alito stated, We have said    time and again that the public expression of ideas may not be    prohibited merely because the ideas are themselves offensive to    some of their hearers. He continued, We now hold that this    provision violates the Free Speech Clause of the First    Amendment. It offends a bedrock First Amendment principle:    Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas    that offend.  <\/p>\n<p>    Not only is the Supreme Courts ruling good news for The    Slants, but it holds positive implications for the National    Football Leagues Washington Redskins. In 2014, the Patent and    Trademark Office canceled the    trademark on the teams name because it deemed Redskins    to be disparaging to Native Americans. Lost on the social    justice warrior yahoos is that no one names their team    something they find disparaging. The Redskins appeal is    currently stuck in the Fourth Circuit Court, but this ruling    should inform the lower courts decision.  <\/p>\n<p>    Americans should rejoice over the fact that freedom of speech    has been protected from those who would seek to prevent it, no    matter how noble their cause may have been. And this should    be a reminder that there will always be those who will seek    through the power of government to silence the speech of those    with whom they find offense or disagreement.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/patriotpost.us\/posts\/49743\" title=\"SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Free Speech - Patriot Post\">SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Free Speech - Patriot Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Thomas Gallatin Jun. 20, 2017 The Supreme Court ruled in an unanimous 8-0 decision Monday to strike down the Patent and Trademark Offices denial of trademark for an offensive band name. The case in question was brought by the Asian-American band The Slants, who had been denied a trademark on the basis that their name was deemed disparaging and offensive.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/scotus-rules-in-favor-of-free-speech-patriot-post\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162383],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom-of-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200128"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200128"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200128\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}