{"id":200059,"date":"2017-06-21T03:43:13","date_gmt":"2017-06-21T07:43:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ron-paul-why-is-us-taking-military-actions-that-benefit-isis-wnd-com\/"},"modified":"2017-06-21T03:43:13","modified_gmt":"2017-06-21T07:43:13","slug":"ron-paul-why-is-us-taking-military-actions-that-benefit-isis-wnd-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/ron-paul\/ron-paul-why-is-us-taking-military-actions-that-benefit-isis-wnd-com\/","title":{"rendered":"Ron Paul: Why is US &#8216;taking military actions that benefit ISIS?&#8217; &#8211; WND.com"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Published: 1 day ago.<\/p>\n<p>      Ron Paul    <\/p>\n<p>    President Donald Trump is veering from his campaign promises to    destroy ISIS at all cost, says former presidential candidate    Ron Paul.  <\/p>\n<p>    On Saturday, a U.S. Navy fighter jet     shot down a Syrian war plane after it attacked rebel forces    being supported by Washington.  <\/p>\n<p>    The F-18 launched from the USS George H.W. Bush in the    Mediterranean Sea near Israel and shot down a Syrian SU-22    fighter over Syrian territory. This is the first time the U.S.    has engaged in an air-to-air shoot-down since the U.S. attack    on Yugoslavia in 1999.  <\/p>\n<p>    In response to the U.S. attack, the Russians have suspended the    use of the military hotline and announced that they will view    all unidentified aircraft operating in the vicinity of Russian    military aircraft as potential targets.  <\/p>\n<p>    Paul is mystified by the Trump administrations actions.  <\/p>\n<p>    The U.S. claims the attack was in self-defense, that the    Syrian jet was threatening U.S.-backed rebel forces in the    area, he said in an emailed statement. That claim has been    debunked by even the pro-rebel Syrian Observatory for Human    Rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    The shoot-down of the Syrian plane is the latest in a pattern    of military actions against the regime of President Bashar    Assad.  <\/p>\n<p>    This marks the fourth recent U.S. attack on Syrian government    forces as they engage ISIS in attempt to eject the terrorists    from eastern Syria, Paul continued. Each time, U.S.    intervention has benefited ISIS.  <\/p>\n<p>    Paul put forth similar criticisms in a June 16    columntitled Why    are we attacking the Syrians who are fighting ISIS.  <\/p>\n<p>    He said the Trump foreign policy visa vie the Middle East is    barely recognizable from the non-interventionist platform upon    which he campaigned.  <\/p>\n<p>    Just when you thought our Syria policy could not get any    worse, last week it did, Paul writes. The Syrian forces were    pursuing ISIS in the area, but the U.S. attacked anyway.  <\/p>\n<p>    Why are we violating the sovereignty of Syria and attacking    its military as they are fighting ISIS? Why does Washington    claim that its primary mission in Syria is to defeat ISIS while    taking military actions that benefit ISIS?  <\/p>\n<p>    Clare Lopez, senior vice president of research and analysis for    the Washington-based Center for Security Policy, says Paul is    justified in his concerns.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lopez said the broader question is: What is the core    compelling U.S. national security objective that would plunge    us into the middle of a 1,400-year-old intra-Islamic sectarian    struggle between Shiites and Sunnis?  <\/p>\n<p>    Paul pointed out that President Trump appears dead set upon    making sure Iran doesnt see its hand strengthened in the    Middle East, even if that means putting a governor on the    campaign to destroy ISIS.  <\/p>\n<p>    What is this really all about? Why does the U.S. military    occupy this base inside Syria? Its partly about preventing the    Syrians and Iraqis from working together to fight ISIS, but I    think its mostly about Iran, Paul wrote. If the Syrians and    Iraqis join up to fight ISIS with the help of Iranian-allied    Shia militia, the U.S. believes it will strengthen Irans hand    in the region. President Trump has recently returned from a    trip to Saudi Arabia where he swore he would not allow that to    happen.  <\/p>\n<p>    But the intervention of the U.S. military in Syria comes with    risks, the biggest one being direct engagement with the Russian    military, Lopez said.  <\/p>\n<p>    The administration appears to be poking the bear without a    clear statement of objectives, she said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lopezwonders if the National Security Council and    Pentagon have formulated a set of strategic objectives for this    region of the Middle East along with the best course of action    that would achieve those objectives.  <\/p>\n<p>    Or, are we sliding inexorably into a maelstrom that will chew    up more American lives and treasure without having set out that    overarching strategy first? Lopez asks.  <\/p>\n<p>    Even if the U.S. were to defeat ISIS, Lopez doubts it is    prepared to defeat the idea that inspires ISIS, meaning the    ideology.  <\/p>\n<p>    From the strategic level down to the tactical one, have the    NSC\/Pentagon actually conducted a thorough investigation of    just who these rebel militia groups on the ground really are?    she asked.  <\/p>\n<p>    Michael K. Nagata, former commander of American Special    Operations forces in the Middle East,     commented back in 2014:We have not defeated the    idea. We do not even understand the idea.  <\/p>\n<p>    Have we ever moved beyond that astonishing admission of    dereliction of professional duty to know the enemy? Lopez    asked.  <\/p>\n<p>    Has the Trump administration conducted its own study of Islam,    jihad and Shariah to a depth of being able to understand why    either Shiite or Sunni groups are fighting each other, us,    Western civilization?  <\/p>\n<p>    How does hurling the U.S. military into defense of what is    very likely a jumble of Middle Eastern jihadist militias    advance the strategic defense of the U.S. homeland,    Constitution or core, compelling national security interests?  <\/p>\n<p>    In his email to WND, Paul said the situation with the Russians    could easily escalate.  <\/p>\n<p>    We do know from the time of the Mujahideen in Afghanistan that    elements in the U.S. national security establishment have    utilized extremists in pursuit of their interventionist foreign    policy goals. The fact that this strategy has failed  with    tragic consequences  does not seem to faze proponents of this    policy.  <\/p>\n<p>    Paul said Russia is furious over the U.S. attack on the    Syrian jet.  <\/p>\n<p>    They also had jets operating in the area, and the U.S. did not    use the hotline designed to avoid any unintended disasters,    Paul said. Indeed, the use of the F-18 instead of a    surface-to-air missile suggests that the U.S. understood the    delicacy of the operation.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wnd.com\/2017\/06\/ron-paul-why-is-u-s-taking-military-actions-that-benefit-isis\/\" title=\"Ron Paul: Why is US 'taking military actions that benefit ISIS?' - WND.com\">Ron Paul: Why is US 'taking military actions that benefit ISIS?' - WND.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Published: 1 day ago. Ron Paul President Donald Trump is veering from his campaign promises to destroy ISIS at all cost, says former presidential candidate Ron Paul.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/ron-paul\/ron-paul-why-is-us-taking-military-actions-that-benefit-isis-wnd-com\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200059","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ron-paul"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200059"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200059"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200059\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}