Photo: Sandy Huffaker\/AFP\/Getty Images <\/p>\n
The Democracy Fund Voter Study Group has a new survey of the electorate that explodes many of the myths that we believe about American politics. Lee Drutman has a fascinating report delving into the data. I want to highlight a few of the most interesting conclusions in the survey. <\/p>\n
1. The Democratic Party is not really divided on economics. You think the Bernie Sanders movement was about socialism? Not really. Sanders voters have the same beliefs about economic equality and government intervention as Hillary Clinton supporters. On the importance of Social Security and Medicare, Sanders voters actually have more conservative views: <\/p>\n
Where they mainly differ is on international trade and the question of whether politics is a rigged game. The ideological content of Sanderss platform is not what drew voters. It was, instead, his counter-positioning to Clinton as a clean, uncorrupted outsider. <\/p>\n
2. Fiscal conservativesocial liberals are overrepresented. The study breaks down the beliefs of voters in both parties by income. The parties tend to cohere pretty tightly rich Republicans are much closer to poor Republicans than either is to the Democrats; and rich Democrats and poor Democrats share more in common than either does with Republicans. <\/p>\n
Still, there are important differences. The richest members of both parties have more economically conservative and socially liberal views than the poorest members. That gives them disproportionate influence over their agendas and priorities. <\/p>\n
3. Libertarians dont exist. Well, obviously, they exist just not in any remotely large enough numbers to form a constituency. Its not just hardcore libertarians who are absent. Even vaguely libertarian-ish voters are functionally nonexistent. <\/p>\n
The study breaks down voters into four quadrants, defined by both social and economic liberalism. But virtually everybody falls into three quadrants: socially liberal\/economically liberal; socially conservative\/economically conservative; and socially conservative\/economically liberal. The fourth quadrant, socially liberal\/economically conservative, is empty: <\/p>\n
The libertarian movement has a lot of money and hardcore activist and intellectual support, which allows it to punch way above its weight. Libertarian organs like Reason regularly churn out polemics and studies designed to show that libertarianism is a huge new trend and the wave of the future. Sometimes, mainstream news organizations buy what theyre selling. But the truth is that the underrepresented cohort in American politics is the opposite of libertarians: people with right-wing social views who support big government on the economy. <\/p>\n
4. Trump won by dominating with populists. Republicans always need to do reasonably well with populists, which is why theres always a tension between the pro-government leanings of a large number of their voters and the anti-government tilt of the party agenda. The key to Trumps success was to win more populists than Mitt Romney had managed. The issues where 2012 Obama voters who defected to Trump diverge from the ones who stayed and voted for Clinton are overwhelmingly related to race and identity. <\/p>\n
As Drutman notes, Among populists who voted for Obama, Clinton did terribly. She held onto only 6 in 10 of these voters (59 percent). Trump picked up 27 percent of these voters, and the remaining 14 percent didnt vote for either major party candidate. What makes this result fascinating is that, in 2008, Clinton had positioned herself as the candidate of the white working class and she dominated the white socially conservative wing of her party. But she lost that identity so thoroughly that she couldnt even replicate the performance of a president who had become synonymous with elite social liberalism. <\/p>\n
Every election is different. But to the extent that 2016 has an ideological lesson for Democrats, it is that the subject the party is currently debating within itself whether or how far left to move on economics is irrelevant to its electoral predicament. The issue space where Clinton lost voters who had supported Obama was in the array of social-identity questions, revolving around patriotism and identity. <\/p>\n
They may not need to solve this problem Trumps failures may well solve it for them. And to some extent, moral commitments to social justice may preclude the party from moving to the center on some or all of their social policies. But to the extent Democrats want to optimize their party profile to make Trump a one-term president, the social issues are where they need to focus. <\/p>\n
Republicans will likely be emboldened by the results, though they only held the traditionally red districts by single digits.<\/p>\n
By dominating early voting and convincing GOP voters that her opponent was out of mainstream, Karen Handel posted a comeback victory.<\/p>\n
While Trump had an 18 point lead in the district, Republican Ralph Norman won by only a few points.<\/p>\n
On the day of Georgias special election, rain is flooding Democratic sections of the district while leaving GOP areas relatively unscathed.<\/p>\n
Hell be releasing a new EP every month for the next four years.<\/p>\n
He opined that the zealot Pence might be worse on domestic policy than Trump. Its a sign the idea of impeachment is becoming real.<\/p>\n
It has been made public after the trial of the officer, who was found not guilty last week.<\/p>\n
While I greatly appreciate the efforts of President Xi & China to help with North Korea, it has not worked out. At least I know China tried!<\/p>\n
Brusselss Central Station has been evacuated, and police say the situation is under control.<\/p>\n
It would be an extremely 2017 miscalculation for liberals to fall in love with sanctions just because Trump opposes them.<\/p>\n
Ryan has routinely won landslides in his purple district. Randy Bryces incredible new campaign ad suggests that could change that.<\/p>\n
The upper chamber is reportedly eyeing an approach to cutting the program that could be more draconian than what passed the House.<\/p>\n
A plurality of Republicans think the special counsels investigation is impartial and 75 percent dont want Trump to fire Robert Mueller.<\/p>\n
Conservatives spent years developing a plan for remaking the health-care system. The Republican Party has buried it forever.<\/p>\n
The First Daughter will meet with Senators Marco Rubio and Deb Fischer to talk over the plan.<\/p>\n
Government technology is bad, and the White House wants you to think they can fix it.<\/p>\n
Is government transparency under attack or is Sean Spicer just being body-shamed?<\/p>\n
Lower education levels, a larger minority population, and affection for Trump make this SC race a better bet for the GOP win than GA-06 next door.<\/p>\n
They want to know why Flynn omitted information from his security clearance forms, which may be illegal.<\/p>\n
The Americans death could lead to new travel restrictions and prompt the U.S. to put more pressure on China to rein in its neighbor.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Link: Photo: Sandy Huffaker\/AFP\/Getty Images The Democracy Fund Voter Study Group has a new survey of the electorate that explodes many of the myths that we believe about American politics. Continue reading
\nNew Study Shows What Really Happened in the 2016 Election - New York Magazine<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"