{"id":199094,"date":"2017-06-15T21:00:22","date_gmt":"2017-06-16T01:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech-heated-on-campuses-investigate-reporting-workshop-blog\/"},"modified":"2017-06-15T21:00:22","modified_gmt":"2017-06-16T01:00:22","slug":"free-speech-heated-on-campuses-investigate-reporting-workshop-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/free-speech-heated-on-campuses-investigate-reporting-workshop-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Free speech heated on campuses &#8211; Investigate reporting workshop (blog)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    By:     Clairissa Baker  <\/p>\n<p>    Posted: June 15, 2017 | Tags: First Amendment  <\/p>\n<p>    Free speech controversies on college campuses nationwide show    some experts that students need education about First Amendment    protections earlier and often, according to a panel of academic    and free speech authorities who spoke Wednesday afternoon at    the Newseum.  <\/p>\n<p>    Panelists said many American college students overwhelmingly    support the First Amendment but feel campus leaders should    create policies that limit or restrict offensive speech. That    shows a tension over what free speech is meant to do.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"They support the First Amendment, but with significant    exceptions, Newseum CEO Jeffrey Herbst, who was a panelist,    said of college students.  <\/p>\n<p>        Photo by Clairissa Baker, IRW      <\/p>\n<p>        Panelists talk about campus press issues Wednesday at the        Newseum.      <\/p>\n<p>    A Knight Foundation study in 2016 found that 91 percent of high    school students agreed people should be allowed to express    unpopular opinions, but only 45 percent agreed people should be    able to say what they want in public, even if it is offensive    to others.   <\/p>\n<p>    Similarly, a recent survey found college students prefer an    open environment, but 69 percent say colleges should be allowed    to restrict language that is intentionally offensive to    certain groups, according to a Knight Foundation and Newseum    Institute study on college students.  <\/p>\n<p>    Speakers at the Knight TV Studio on Wednesday included John K.    Wilson, co-editor of American Association of University    Professors blog, and Catherine Ross, a George Washington    University law professor. Gene Policinski, chief operating    officer of the Newseum Institute, moderated the panel.  <\/p>\n<p>    Herbst began by talking about speakers being turned down by    college campuses because of political tension. But he said the    college bubble in which many students find themselves is not    the problem. Instead, the real problem to address is the    attitude of students, Herbst said, because students arent a    blank slate when they cross into college on the first day.  <\/p>\n<p>    Incidents, such as the one in which the University of    California, Berkeley disinvited Ann Coulter after threats of    violence, according to reports by the Southern Poverty Law    Center, have expanded debates about free speech on college    campuses.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wilson, who wrote a book on academic freedom, provided a    critique of the summary of the state of free speech.  <\/p>\n<p>    The First Amendment has always been in a terrible state, he    said, and theres nothing special about millennials.   <\/p>\n<p>    Hypocrisies are everywhere, and pretending one generation is    the source, Wilson said, is misguided. Things are bad, and we    need to deal with them because thats the norm.  <\/p>\n<p>    Among those in the audience was LaMonte Summers, a media law    and ethics professor at Morgan State Universitys School of    Global Journalism and Communication.  <\/p>\n<p>    Summers asked the panel if society needed to revisit how the    First Amendment handles hate speech, mentioning a U.S. Supreme    Court case in which a teenager burned a cross on the lawn of an    African-American family.  <\/p>\n<p>    Summers attended the event because many of his students work in    media and his classes have discussions about similar issues.  <\/p>\n<p>    I thought that critique was an excellent part of the panel,    Summers said.  <\/p>\n<p>    The panel raised concerns with students willingness to set    limitations on free speech, even if it was to avoid hateful and    offensive language. The way to address this issue with    students, Herbst and Ross said, is to look at how society    teaches the First Amendment in grades K-12.  <\/p>\n<p>    The panel agreed teachers and students need more robust lessons    on the First Amendment, but Ross said the only way to combat    offensive speech was more and better speech.  <\/p>\n<p>    If you seek change, the First Amendment is your ally, Herbst    said.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/investigativereportingworkshop.org\/blogs\/shop-notes\/posts\/2017\/jun\/15\/students-free-speech\/\" title=\"Free speech heated on campuses - Investigate reporting workshop (blog)\">Free speech heated on campuses - Investigate reporting workshop (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By: Clairissa Baker Posted: June 15, 2017 | Tags: First Amendment Free speech controversies on college campuses nationwide show some experts that students need education about First Amendment protections earlier and often, according to a panel of academic and free speech authorities who spoke Wednesday afternoon at the Newseum. Panelists said many American college students overwhelmingly support the First Amendment but feel campus leaders should create policies that limit or restrict offensive speech.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/free-speech-heated-on-campuses-investigate-reporting-workshop-blog\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-199094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199094"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199094"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199094\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}