In the days to follow Thursdays shooting in Alexandria, debates over whether and when political rhetoric goes too far will likely be on the table, especially after suspicions arose that shooter James T. Hodgkinson may have been politically motivated when he fired at Republicans practicing for the annual congressional baseball game. <\/p>\n
Similar debates sparked in the aftermath of the 2011 shooting attack on Arizona Democrat Rep. Gabby Giffords and several others gathered outside a supermarket. <\/p>\n
Sam Fisher, Associate Professor of Political Science atUniversity of South Alabama, says the free speech debate is deeply complex. <\/p>\n
Theres no neat line that I can point to and say, Heres the point you need to stop and thats unacceptable,' Fisher said. <\/p>\n
Fisher said hes noticed a shift in more hostile political rhetoric as political parties take more polarizing stances towards each other. <\/p>\n
Compromise has always been seen as [not good], but its actually something that makes the system work, Fisher said. Now, we have this real increase in harsh rhetoric that I think is an outcry of My side is the only right side, and therefore I have to win. If I dont, Im going to make life miserable for everybody else.' <\/p>\n
After instances like comedian Kathy Griffin posing with a fake severed head of President Trump and a New York public theater performing a version of Julius Caesar that features a mock execution of a Trump-like character, online debates have come alive over whether that kind of rhetoric is going too far. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See original here: In the days to follow Thursdays shooting in Alexandria, debates over whether and when political rhetoric goes too far will likely be on the table, especially after suspicions arose that shooter James T. Continue reading
\nViolence in Politics: When Does Free Speech Go Too Far? | WKRG - WKRG<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"