{"id":198781,"date":"2017-06-15T06:43:52","date_gmt":"2017-06-15T10:43:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/how-an-exposed-nipple-forced-us-to-think-about-safe-spaces-and-censorship-the-guardian\/"},"modified":"2017-06-15T06:43:52","modified_gmt":"2017-06-15T10:43:52","slug":"how-an-exposed-nipple-forced-us-to-think-about-safe-spaces-and-censorship-the-guardian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/how-an-exposed-nipple-forced-us-to-think-about-safe-spaces-and-censorship-the-guardian\/","title":{"rendered":"How an exposed nipple forced us to think about safe spaces and censorship &#8211; The Guardian"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Lawless describes how her femme presentation, queer identity and  sex work inhibit her access to spaces designated as safe for  any one of these intersecting parts of her identity. Photograph:  Byron Spencer\/Archer Magazine<\/p>\n<p>    The cover for Archer Magazines    new issue was released this week. We commissioned photographer    Byron Spencer to shoot Tilly Lawless, a Sydney-based sex worker    and activist, who penned a piece for this issue. Of the images,    the one that most encapsulated Archer Magazine and everything    we stand for  individuality, empowerment, fluidity,    authenticity and attitude  happened to show one of Lawlesss    nipples.  <\/p>\n<p>    We knew wed have to cover the nipple. Even if we could somehow    bypass the censorship laws around visibility on newsstands,    which would impact our stockists across Australia, USA, UK and    Germany, we would still have the issue of social media. There    was no way Facebook, Instagram or Twitter would allow the    un-censored cover image to last on their interfaces for long.  <\/p>\n<p>    So we did what any good editorial team would do: we placed a    political message  Uncensor me!  on a removable sticker    over the nipple, giving our readers agency to free Lawlesss    nipple. We incorporated a bright-pink sticker into a cover    design that was frankly in need of some colour anyway, and then    we wrote to a couple of news outlets with a piece about the    situation, giving us a larger platform for our message.  <\/p>\n<p>    We made the best of a bad situation. But the real irony of this    enforced censorship lies in Lawlesss article content.    Extrapolating on the spaces theme, Lawless describes how her    femme presentation, queer identity and sex work inhibit her    access to spaces designated as safe for any one of these    intersecting parts of her identity. In spaces designated for    sex workers, her queer identity is not always welcome. In queer    spaces, her line of work can be stigmatised, or else she is    excluded for appearing too femme to be a lesbian.  <\/p>\n<p>    I have given up my search for the perfect space. Instead, Ive    moulded my own, with the rage and frustration of being    unwelcome in others. Ive smoothed it with my tears of    rejection, and then stepped inside it: the one place I can be    safe.  <\/p>\n<p>    Now, our society has dictated that Lawlesss feminine body must    be censored before she can grace the cover of a progressive,    inclusive and independently-published magazine. Now that,    Alanis, is irony. (Im just kidding, Alanis, I love you and I    never cared about the song.)  <\/p>\n<p>    At Archer Magazine, we dont make a lot of compromises on    content, but there are rules we need to follow to effectively    share the voices we work so hard to amplify.  <\/p>\n<p>    In a way, these roadblocks offer opportunities to illustrate or    interrogate our flawed social system, and the many ideologies    that restrict our behaviour, and the decisions we make as    members of this society.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its a reminder to stay vigilant to the stringent guidelines    were expected to adhere to, the incessant conditioning that    slips beneath our awareness until something shakes us and were    awoken to it.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lawless is one individual who shakes and tears at the binds    society uses to contain us. At this roadblock, Im considering    where else these binds hold us.  <\/p>\n<p>    How would we behave, if we were allowed to look and act like    any mesh of genders, ages, sexualities, life situations and    cultures, without the guidebook were threatened with, day    after day? How would women behave if we werent conditioned    from birth to stay hyper-aware of how were perceived by the    male gaze?  <\/p>\n<p>    Crucially, how would our creative pursuits differ if we had    freedom to express our message, as long as it was respectful    and thoughtful?  <\/p>\n<p>    Archer Magazine aims to do all these things, and even we are    bound occasionally. That doesnt mean we wont put up a fight.    We need to keep battling, and use restriction and censorship as    a platform for argument and dissent.  <\/p>\n<p>    As Lawless writes in her piece for Archer Magazine #8: Im    used to having to build my own spaces, by tooth and nail,    stiletto and pen. A small space clawed out of an unforgiving,    formidable cli.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continue reading here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2017\/jun\/15\/how-an-exposed-nipple-forced-us-to-think-about-safe-spaces-and-censorship\" title=\"How an exposed nipple forced us to think about safe spaces and censorship - The Guardian\">How an exposed nipple forced us to think about safe spaces and censorship - The Guardian<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Lawless describes how her femme presentation, queer identity and sex work inhibit her access to spaces designated as safe for any one of these intersecting parts of her identity.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/how-an-exposed-nipple-forced-us-to-think-about-safe-spaces-and-censorship-the-guardian\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198781"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198781"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198781\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}