{"id":198725,"date":"2017-06-14T04:43:59","date_gmt":"2017-06-14T08:43:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/rebel-with-a-cause-the-one-conservative-who-voted-for-legal-pot-marijuana-com\/"},"modified":"2017-06-14T04:43:59","modified_gmt":"2017-06-14T08:43:59","slug":"rebel-with-a-cause-the-one-conservative-who-voted-for-legal-pot-marijuana-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/victimless-crimes\/rebel-with-a-cause-the-one-conservative-who-voted-for-legal-pot-marijuana-com\/","title":{"rendered":"Rebel With a Cause: The One Conservative Who Voted For Legal Pot &#8211; Marijuana.com"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The legalization of marijuana in Canada has brought about    many questions throughout the process. What will the    final age limit be?    Where will marijuana be sold? And will there be    restrictions on advertising for pot    companies?  <\/p>\n<p>    The only aspect of this enigmatic experience that we have    been able to predict is where the political party lines have    been drawn on the issue.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Liberals, of course, want to pass their bill and make    marijuana legal for all adults. The New Democrats (NDP) want to    do the same, but also eliminate arrests and    convictions for possession immediately. The Conservative Party    has been historically predictable, not wanting to legalize    at all.  <\/p>\n<p>    That goes for all Conservatives except one.  <\/p>\n<p>    During the second reading of Bill C-45, Conservative    MP Scott Reid was the only    outlier among the group, voting in favour of legalization. This    change is a refreshing outlook amongst a sea of unsurprising    dissension from Reids party on the issue.  <\/p>\n<p>    We have a policy as a party that possession of marijuana    should be a ticket offense, said Reid in an interview    with Marijuana.com. Theres    what the party supports, and there are my own views, which are    two separate things.  <\/p>\n<p>    Reid goes on to explain that he has been of the mind for    quite some time that marijuana should    be legal for adults. Ive been an advocate of marijuana    legalization since before the beginning of my political career.    My own view is based on being a libertarian and believing that    we should not have victimless crimes. Also, having a safe    supply and ending the existence of revenue sources for    organized crime is a good thing.  <\/p>\n<p>    Regardless of Reids difference in opinion with his    party, he has never received any pressure from them to change    his mind and join their ranks on the issue. This is not new    for me, I published a paper in 2001.    Within a year of my first election, it was widely known that I    was an advocate of marijuana legalization. Not    decriminalization but of full legalization. People have    respectfully disagreed, but [other than that]it has never    been a problem.  <\/p>\n<p>    Now that the bill has passed the second reading with the    help of Reid, he will be developing a questionnaire for his    constituents to ask how they feel he should vote in what will    be the third and final reading of the bill. In the third    reading, you have the bill in its final form. That is the    appropriate point at which to say to your constituents, is it    what you want, is it good enough?  <\/p>\n<p>    Even before posing the question to the citizens Reid    represents, he is already unsatisfied with some points of the    bill. Right now the contemplative legislation proposes the age    of 18 as the age at which it will be legal to consume cannabis.    Others have proposed a higher age, including myself. Ive    proposed 21 as being preferable. Reid added that he also feels    that liquor and cannabis should not be sold together, which was    an option that     Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne    supported. They are not products that should be sold    [together]for public health reasons.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite the challenges Reid has with the bill, the    Conservative Member voted for C-45 because he believes in the    bigger picture. Seemingly, the most challenging part for Reid    was not voting for what he believed in, but being applauded by    the Liberals when doing so. Having voted against my party on a    number of occasions, I never enjoy [applause from the    opposition], he said. Ive talked to people from multiple    parties who have voted against party lines and it is always an    uncomfortable feeling when it happens, just because of the    partisan nature of the House.  <\/p>\n<p>    As the Trudeau government steamrolls forward with its    plan to change the history of prohibition, its clear that the    issue of pot legalization creates strange bedfellows. But    amongst the exciting and chaotic times we Canadian pot lovers    live in, one thing is clear. Marijuana is going to be legal in    Canada thanks to the powers that be and people like MP Scott    Reid, who stood up in a sea of Conservatives and voted against    their collective mindset.  <\/p>\n<p>    Well done Scott Reid, well done.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cover Image Courtesy of CBC  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to see the original:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuana.com\/news\/2017\/06\/rebel-with-a-cause-the-one-conservative-who-voted-for-legal-pot\/\" title=\"Rebel With a Cause: The One Conservative Who Voted For Legal Pot - Marijuana.com\">Rebel With a Cause: The One Conservative Who Voted For Legal Pot - Marijuana.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The legalization of marijuana in Canada has brought about many questions throughout the process. What will the final age limit be? Where will marijuana be sold <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/victimless-crimes\/rebel-with-a-cause-the-one-conservative-who-voted-for-legal-pot-marijuana-com\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187829],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-victimless-crimes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198725"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}