{"id":198509,"date":"2017-06-14T03:49:52","date_gmt":"2017-06-14T07:49:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/dna-left-by-ocean-animals-provides-rare-glimpse-of-marine-ecosystems-stanford-researchers-say-stanford-university-news\/"},"modified":"2017-06-14T03:49:52","modified_gmt":"2017-06-14T07:49:52","slug":"dna-left-by-ocean-animals-provides-rare-glimpse-of-marine-ecosystems-stanford-researchers-say-stanford-university-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/dna-left-by-ocean-animals-provides-rare-glimpse-of-marine-ecosystems-stanford-researchers-say-stanford-university-news\/","title":{"rendered":"DNA left by ocean animals provides rare glimpse of marine ecosystems, Stanford researchers say &#8211; Stanford University News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The ocean might as well be Mars. Like astronomers grasping at    ways to identify life on a distant planet, marine scientists    have no easy method for detecting sea creatures presence in    the vast watery realm.  <\/p>\n<p>      Team members from the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research      Institute collect water from Monterey Bay for eDNA analysis.      (Image credit: Collin      Closek)    <\/p>\n<p>    An emerging technique  analyzing DNA in skin, scales and feces    animals leave behind  has shown promise for revealing hidden    ecosystems on land and in fresh water. But deep ocean    environments have largely proven too complex for the approach.    Now, Stanford scientists show progress in using this analysis    to overcome complicated water movements and other obstacles to    detect ocean animals in locations where the water can be more    than 7,200 feet deep.  <\/p>\n<p>    We want to know whats out there, said     study lead author Elizabeth A. Andruszkiewicz, a graduate    student in Stanfords Department of Civil and Environmental    Engineering. Eventually, this technology may answer bigger    questions, such as how communities of organisms have adapted to    environmental changes over time.  <\/p>\n<p>    Of the few previous environmental DNA, or eDNA, studies of    ocean animals, all were done in relatively shallow nearshore    environments. Most were done in controlled systems such as    saltwater tanks, and few looked in real environments at    questions of spatial distribution of eDNA.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Stanford-led study also marks the first time the approach    has been used in the deep waters of Monterey Bay, an important    ecosystem in the California Current, which flows southward    along the western coast of North America. In addition to being    highly productive ecosystems, these areas have been the focus    of relatively intensive ongoing research by institutions such    as the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (a partner in    the study). The resulting archived water samples and long-term    datasets present unique opportunities for eDNA analysis of    ecological change over time.  <\/p>\n<p>      Sampler device is deployed to collect water in Monterey Bay.      (Image credit: Collin      Closek)    <\/p>\n<p>    Collecting eDNA is fairly straightforward  a basic water    sample does the trick  and scientists can archive these    samples for long periods by freezing them. The approach    promises a faster, more comprehensive and less invasive way to    measure abundance and distribution of organisms. It might also    be able to detect invasive species or changes in the    distribution of endangered species.  <\/p>\n<p>    This could revolutionize the way we keep track of animals,    said study co-author Alexandria    Boehm, professor of civil and environmental engineering and    a senior fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the    Environment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The eDNA survey identified 72 species of vertebrates (marine    fishes, mammals such as elephant seals, humpback whales, sharks    and rockfishes) at study sites across 28 miles of the Monterey    Bay National Marine Sanctuary.  <\/p>\n<p>    Scientists found DNA of some creatures, such as sunfishes,    salmon, seahorses and mackerel sharks, only in locations where    the water was less than 600 feet deep. DNA of other animals,    such as dolphins and marine smelts, turned up only in waters    more than 600 feet deep. The shallowest waters held the    greatest biodiversity. Taken as a whole, the findings provide a    proof of concept for eDNA as an ocean sleuthing tool.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is a remarkably powerful way to answer a simple question:    What species are present in space and time in our oceans? said    co-author Barbara    Block, the Charles and Elizabeth Prothro Professor in    Marine Sciences at Stanford. It could change how we view our    planets marine biodiversity.  <\/p>\n<p>    DNA sequencing has driven unprecedented research and discovery    in fields ranging from medical diagnosis to evolutionary    biology.  <\/p>\n<p>      Pacific white-sided dolphins accompany the NOAA ship Reuben      Lasker off the coast of California in June 2016 during a      cruise collecting water samples for environmental DNA (eDNA)      analysis. (Image credit: Collin      Closek)    <\/p>\n<p>    Preliminary studies have shown that eDNA sequencing can    identify vertebrate species missed by traditional monitoring    methods and can allow sampling in places inaccessible to    traditional techniques such as dive surveys and fish trawls.    The approach can also be used at finer resolutions, in terms of    time and space, compared to traditional biomonitoring methods.    This allows scientists to document changes in biodiversity over    seasonal and annual cycles, as well as over different    topographies.  <\/p>\n<p>    Questions still remain about how to properly sample water for    eDNA, and how to interpret sequencing results to avoid false    positives and false negatives. Solving these and other    challenges will bring into focus the next frontier for eDNA:    counting actual numbers of sea animals and discerning their    population-level identity, rather than just detecting their    presence. Working with a team of geneticists, fish    physiologists, oceanographers and engineers, Boehm and Block    hope to realize that goal within 10 years.  <\/p>\n<p>    Additional authors on Biomonitoring of marine    vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding,    published in PLOS ONE, are Lauren M.    Sassoubre, a former postdoctoral scholar at Stanford; Hilary A.    Starks of Stanfords Center for Ocean Solutions; and Francisco    P. Chavez of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute.  <\/p>\n<p>    The research was supported by a gift from the Seaver    Institute to the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environments    Environmental Venture Projects program, the U.S. Environmental    Protection Agency and the David and Lucile Packard    Foundation.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Visit link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/news.stanford.edu\/2017\/06\/13\/dna-left-ocean-animals-provides-rare-glimpse-marine-ecosystems\/\" title=\"DNA left by ocean animals provides rare glimpse of marine ecosystems, Stanford researchers say - Stanford University News\">DNA left by ocean animals provides rare glimpse of marine ecosystems, Stanford researchers say - Stanford University News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The ocean might as well be Mars. Like astronomers grasping at ways to identify life on a distant planet, marine scientists have no easy method for detecting sea creatures presence in the vast watery realm.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/dna-left-by-ocean-animals-provides-rare-glimpse-of-marine-ecosystems-stanford-researchers-say-stanford-university-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198509"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198509"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198509\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}