{"id":198325,"date":"2017-06-12T20:10:07","date_gmt":"2017-06-13T00:10:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nvidias-next-big-thing-the-hgx-1-ai-platform-seeking-alpha\/"},"modified":"2017-06-12T20:10:07","modified_gmt":"2017-06-13T00:10:07","slug":"nvidias-next-big-thing-the-hgx-1-ai-platform-seeking-alpha","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/nvidias-next-big-thing-the-hgx-1-ai-platform-seeking-alpha\/","title":{"rendered":"Nvidia&#8217;s Next Big Thing: The HGX-1 AI Platform &#8211; Seeking Alpha"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Over the past three months, Nvidia's (NASDAQ:NVDA) stock has been upgraded by    several financial services firms including Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), Citigroup (NYSE:C), and Bernstein, while some others have downgraded    the stock, such as Pacific Crest. In an     article published in December, last year, I said Nvidia's    stock could scale new highs if the company's revenue continues    to grow at a CAGR of 20% plus in the foreseeable future. At    that time, the stock created a new high around $120, before    correcting almost 20% afterwards.  <\/p>\n<p>    I also cautioned investors that the stock could go through    spine-chilling volatility, and that's exactly what is happening    now. The commentaries of several sell-side analyst firms fueled    the extent of volatility beyond what happens under normal    circumstances. My medium-term target for the stock is $200+,    albeit with continued volatility. The new catalyst for the    stock will be the availability of its HGX-1 platform at the    hyperscale space.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Nvidia: Revisiting the Bull Thesis  <\/p>\n<p>    My investment thesis was based on the expectation that Nvidia's    revenue will grow at a CAGR of 20% plus in the next three    years. The primary revenue growth driver will be the expanding    application of artificial intelligence (AI) and\/or deep    learning (DL) across various industries. Let's focus on    Nvidia's competitive advantage in AI\/DL.  <\/p>\n<p>    Nvidia's DGX-1 platform is its trump card to lead the next    generation of AI-wave leveraging the TensorFlow software    library, originally developed by Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL)(NASDAQ:GOOG). Nvidia recently launched a partner program with    hyperscale vendors, such as Foxconn, Inventec, Quanta and    Wistron, for its HGX-1 AI reference platform. What's the    difference between DGX-1 and HGX-1? Well, HGX-1 is the    hyperscale version of the DGX-1 platform. The launch of the    partnership program will have a strong and sustainable impact    in the HPC (high performance computing) space via hyperscale    players.  <\/p>\n<p>    Investors need to understand how the advantages of TensorFlow    coupled with Nvidia's HGX-1 reference architecture will boost    its revenue in the foreseeable future, which Nvidia's stock at    today's price around $150 hasn't factored in.  <\/p>\n<p>    CUDA, HGX and TensorFlow  <\/p>\n<p>    TensorFlow has become extremely popular since its inception in    late 2015 by the Google Brain Team. Its appeal lies in its    usage of data flow graphs for solving complex mathematical    problems related to building efficient neural networks. Add to    that its support for multiple GPUs and CPUs via a single API.    This is the secret sauce behind the immense success of    TensorFlow, out-competing other AI-related software libraries,    such as torch, caffe and theano in terms of speeding up the    training process of the neural networks.  <\/p>\n<p>    Engineers at Nvidia were quick to understand TensorFlow's    competitive advantage over other software libraries. While    Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) was busy to make its MKL    (math kernel library) more versatile via incorporating the Neon    deep learning framework of Nervana, the startup which Intel    acquired almost a year ago, Nvidia silently    made its CUDA parallel computing software platform compatible    with TensorFlow.  <\/p>\n<p>    The DGX-1 platform, which is basically a parallel    processing-based hardware accelerator with eight Nvidia Tesla    P100 GPUs, is the platform that gave birth to HGX-1. Both DGX-1    and HGX-1 connect the eight Tesla P100 GPUs via NVLink    interconnect. With the introduction of HGX-1 earlier this year and    then making it available to end-users via different hyperscale    vendors, Nvidia has opened the door for running different kinds    of AI\/DL workloads for various industries.  <\/p>\n<p>    How HGX-1 would expand the scope of DGX-1 via taking the latter    to the hyperscale space? Okay, before addressing the issue    let's delve a bit deeper into how Nvidia's upcoming Tesla V100,    i.e., Tesla powered by Volta GPU architecture, will help DGX-1    deliver much faster performance compared to other GPU-based    systems. The Volta architecture will be made to support    Tensor-based AI\/DL operations, which implies the HGX-1 will    also deliver Tensor-based performance boost at the hyperscale    space.  <\/p>\n<p>    HGX At Hyperscale: What Does It Really Mean?  <\/p>\n<p>    What does HGX at the hyperscale space mean for investors?    Simple. It means more revenue for Nvidia. Since hyperscale    computing enables datacenters to deploy distributed computing    environments across the globe via scaling only a few servers to    lots of servers, Nvidia's GPUs will see a steady rise in    adoption. However, that doesn't necessarily mean all the    datacenters across the world will need to deploy the high end    Tesla P100 or the upcoming Tesla V100 GPUs.  <\/p>\n<p>    Only the hyperscale datacenters will need them. For the    traditional datacenters, Nvidia's Pascal-powered midrange    Quadro workstation GPUs will be enough. This essentially means    HGX has the ability to boost the overall demand for Nvidia's    server-grade GPUs. Nvidia's decision to launch the HGX partner    program will help it grab a significant portion of the AI\/DL    market share from archrivals Intel and AMD (NASDAQ:AMD).  <\/p>\n<p>    Intel is also trying to make MKL compatible with TensorFlow.    However, the process isn't complete yet. I believe Intel has    potential to compete with Nvidia in the parallel processing    space. But due to its FPGA-dominated business model and late    entrance in the AI\/DL marketplace, it won't be able to become a    real competitor of Nvidia just yet.  <\/p>\n<p>    Unfortunately for Nvidia, though, AMD has made significant    progress in the last six months. AMD, with its upcoming Radeon    Instinct line of GPUs along with its upcoming Zen-based Naples    CPUs (bundled with the SenseMI technology), could be Nvidia's real    competitor, but for that to happen the OpenCL (open computing    language) software library (which is the CUDA equivalent for    AMD, and to some extent Intel) needs to support TensorFlow.    Please refer to my article mentioned at the beginning to learn    more about CUDA and OpenCL.  <\/p>\n<p>    Valuation  <\/p>\n<p>    Nvidia's trailing 12-month revenue is $7.5 billion. A CAGR    growth rate of 20%, which is quite possible due its AI\/DL    leadership as analyzed above, will catapult its revenue closer    to $13 billion in 2020. And since such an incredible growth is    almost given, I won't be surprised if the Street offers a P\/S    multiple of 17\/18x to its stock in the next six months. After a    year, Nvidia's revenue will be around $9 billion at the CAGR    rate mentioned above, and at ~15x P\/S multiple the stock will    get closer to or even slightly beyond the $200 level. So it's a    strong possibility that the stock will cross the $200 mark in    the next six to twelve months.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    NVDA Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts  <\/p>\n<p>    Final Words  <\/p>\n<p>    Nvidia is a secular bull story. However, you need nerves of    steel to be a part of the story. AI\/DL was a concept even a few    years ago, and has started to take the shape of an industry    just now. I would recommend risk-tolerant investors to hold the    stock as a long-term investment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Disclosure: I am\/we are long NVDA, GOOGL.  <\/p>\n<p>    I wrote this article myself,    and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving    compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no    business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned    in this article.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/4080891-nvidias-next-big-thing-hgxminus-1-ai-platform\" title=\"Nvidia's Next Big Thing: The HGX-1 AI Platform - Seeking Alpha\">Nvidia's Next Big Thing: The HGX-1 AI Platform - Seeking Alpha<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Over the past three months, Nvidia's (NASDAQ:NVDA) stock has been upgraded by several financial services firms including Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), Citigroup (NYSE:C), and Bernstein, while some others have downgraded the stock, such as Pacific Crest. In an article published in December, last year, I said Nvidia's stock could scale new highs if the company's revenue continues to grow at a CAGR of 20% plus in the foreseeable future. At that time, the stock created a new high around $120, before correcting almost 20% afterwards.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/nvidias-next-big-thing-the-hgx-1-ai-platform-seeking-alpha\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187743],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198325"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198325\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}