{"id":197834,"date":"2017-06-09T13:50:32","date_gmt":"2017-06-09T17:50:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/new-cloud-computing-and-it-outsourcing-requirements-in-the-financial-sector-lexology-registration\/"},"modified":"2017-06-09T13:50:32","modified_gmt":"2017-06-09T17:50:32","slug":"new-cloud-computing-and-it-outsourcing-requirements-in-the-financial-sector-lexology-registration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/cloud-computing\/new-cloud-computing-and-it-outsourcing-requirements-in-the-financial-sector-lexology-registration\/","title":{"rendered":"New Cloud Computing and IT Outsourcing Requirements in the Financial Sector &#8211; Lexology (registration)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    On 17 May, 2017 the Luxembourg Financial Regulator (CSSF)    published four new circulars concerning cloud computing and IT    outsourcing. The new regulations will immediately affect credit    institutions, professionals of the financial sector, payment    service providers, and electronic money issuers (Entities). The    four CSSF circulars, which came into effect on the date of    their publication, introduce new rules and replace existing    requirements set out in existing circulars.  <\/p>\n<p>    Main novelties and amendments  <\/p>\n<p>    Circular 17\/654  <\/p>\n<p>    This circular addresses the obligations that Entities must meet    when their IT infrastructure uses or will rely on a cloud    computing infrastructure.  <\/p>\n<p>    The circular applies to the partial or full transfer of the    activities and does not make many differences between an    external provider and an internal provider within a group of    companies.  <\/p>\n<p>    The CSSF defines the term of material activity as any    activity that, when not properly performed, reduces the ability    of an Entity to meet regulatory requirements or continue its    operations, and any activities that are necessary for the sound    and prudent risk management.  <\/p>\n<p>    Three different IT service models are described:  <\/p>\n<p>    For each of the above service models, the CSSF provides an    interpretation of the levels of control on the systems and the    software that an Entity must respect when applying such model.  <\/p>\n<p>    Within these service models the CSSF differentiates four    different cloud types:  <\/p>\n<p>    An Entitys outsourcing of IT matters will qualify for    particular regulatory treatment, if it meets specific criteria    set out by the CSSF and will be excluded from the scope of    other existing regulations relating the Entitys central    administration, accounting organization, internal governance    and risk management (e.g. Circulars 12\/552 or 17\/656).  <\/p>\n<p>    The criteria that the CSSF uses to define the specific    regulatory treatment are:  <\/p>\n<p>    If the above criteria are fulfilled an Entity must obtain the    CSSFs prior approval (if a material activity is concerned). In    case a Luxembourg based professional of the financial sector is    used, an Entity must only file a prior notification to the    CSSF.  <\/p>\n<p>    Once the outsourcing is implemented, all the changes to the    set-up and the service providers as well as the in-sourcing    must be notified to the regulator before an Entity enacts them.  <\/p>\n<p>    Entities under the supervision of the CSSF that would like to    offer cloud computing services or related operating services to    their clients must submit a program description to the CSSF to    obtain its prior approval.  <\/p>\n<p>    This circular amends the requirements applicable to credit    institutions, investment firms and professional lenders. The    amendments introduce Circular 17\/654 and clarify that Circular    05\/178 is repealed.  <\/p>\n<p>    In addition, the amendments clarify that every time specific    infrastructures are used or changed, authorized entities must    observe data protection and professional secrecy rules.  <\/p>\n<p>    The circular clarifies the conditions for the use of other    group entities that are not authorized by the CSSF. The systems    of such group entities may be used under the condition that no    confidential information is stored in a readable manner on    those systems. If this is the case, the supervised entity must    inform its clients and, if required, collect their consent.  <\/p>\n<p>    This circular aligns the IT outsourcing requirements for    professionals of the financial sector other than investment    firms, payment service providers and electronic money issuers    to those applicable to credit institutions and investment    firms. It copies the wording of the relevant sections of    Circular 12\/552 to ensure consistency and ease further    alignments.  <\/p>\n<p>    Finally, the circular introduces Circular 17\/564 and clarifies    that professionals of the financial sector that offer IT    services to their clients, may use the infrastructure of a    third party or sub-delegate a part of their services only with    the prior consent of the concerned clients.  <\/p>\n<p>    This circular amends Circular 06\/240 and is applicable to all    credit institutions and professionals of the financial sector.    One important clarification of this circular consists of    providing that only the production environment should contain    confidential data, whereas the test and development    environment(s) (that as per applicable regulation may be    accessed by third parties) should not contain confidential    data.  <\/p>\n<p>    Future developments  <\/p>\n<p>    As the four circulars came into effect on the date of their    publication, the Entities auditors are expected to pay    particular attention to the new requirements when carrying out    their audits.  <\/p>\n<p>    Entities supervised by the CSSF will have to carefully study    the new circulars and analyze the impact on their existing    administrative organization and IT infrastructure, because if    affected, they must be aligned to the new requirements.    Therefore, changes may need to be implemented at multiple    levels:  <\/p>\n<p>    As service providers located outside of Luxembourg will be    required to accept contractual provisions that they have never    been requested to comply with before, (for instance, amendments    to certifications and controls), the time to implement the    changes should not be underestimated.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read this article:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.lexology.com\/library\/detail.aspx?g=fa19f8b0-25f9-49d6-9d08-80c6ed32e50f\" title=\"New Cloud Computing and IT Outsourcing Requirements in the Financial Sector - Lexology (registration)\">New Cloud Computing and IT Outsourcing Requirements in the Financial Sector - Lexology (registration)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> On 17 May, 2017 the Luxembourg Financial Regulator (CSSF) published four new circulars concerning cloud computing and IT outsourcing.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/cloud-computing\/new-cloud-computing-and-it-outsourcing-requirements-in-the-financial-sector-lexology-registration\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[257743],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cloud-computing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197834"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197834"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197834\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}