{"id":196979,"date":"2017-06-06T06:39:50","date_gmt":"2017-06-06T10:39:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/will-the-government-fall-off-the-fiscal-cliff-cbs-news\/"},"modified":"2017-06-06T06:39:50","modified_gmt":"2017-06-06T10:39:50","slug":"will-the-government-fall-off-the-fiscal-cliff-cbs-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/will-the-government-fall-off-the-fiscal-cliff-cbs-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Will the government fall off the fiscal cliff? &#8211; CBS News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Congress' next few month are likely to be filled with drama, as    lawmakers face tackling the debt ceiling, negotiating a new    budget deal to lift limits on government spending and trying to    head off a government shutdown this fall.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lawmakers return to Capitol Hill this week from their Memorial    Day recess facing two solid months of legislative hurdles    before their scheduled five-week recess in August.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"There is so much to do, and there's so much uncertainty out    there, that we are heading into a very intense two-month work    period, and if we're going to do anything this year, we have to    do it now,\" warned Jim Dyer, principal at the Podesta Group who    previously served as the House Appropriations Committee's staff    director.  <\/p>\n<p>    Budget experts, including Dyer, and lawmakers are expecting a    negotiation for a major fiscal deal with the timing for that    likely to be determined by the deadline to address the debt    ceiling. That is, lawmakers might have to reach a deal before    Congress moves on to approving government funding for 2018.  <\/p>\n<p>    If Congress fails to complete these tasks, the U.S. could    default on its debt; all discretionary spending -- including    both defense and non-defense -- would be slashed with cuts; and    the government would shut down.  <\/p>\n<p>    Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has called on Congress to    raise the debt limit before lawmakers leave for the summer and    has specified that it should be a \"clean\" increase -- a demand    that the conservative Freedom Caucus quickly rejected. The    group said in a statement that any debt ceiling increase should    be coupled with spending cuts in exchange. For context,    Democrats have only ever agreed to a \"clean\" lifting of the    debt limit.  <\/p>\n<p>      Play Video    <\/p>\n<p>      The House speaker discusses how Congress and the Trump      administration plan to deal with the debt ceiling    <\/p>\n<p>    For the last debt ceiling deadline in 2015, Congress was able    to wait until October to address it. As it usually does, the    Treasury Department has been relying on so-called    \"extraordinary measures\" since mid-March of this year to buy    more time but time may be running out sooner than previous    years. When the threat of a default becomes more pronounced,    that could spur a much larger fiscal deal.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"If there is to be a budget deal, and I believe there has to be    a budget deal, I think the action-enforcing event will be the    debt ceiling,\" Dyer said. \"It's like the bitter medicine that    no one wants to take, but they know they have to take it anyway    if they're going to survive.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Since 2013, Congress has twice passed two-year bipartisan    budget agreements to lift spending limits that were put in    place by a 2011 law.  <\/p>\n<p>    The first was negotiated by then-House Budget Chairman Paul    Ryan, R-Wisconsin, and his Senate counterpart, Patty Murray,    D-Washington. The last one, in 2015, was reached by    then-Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, Senate Majority Leader Mitch    McConnell, R-Kentucky and his Democratic counterpart, Harry    Reid of Nevada. The     2015 deal will expire at the end of September, and    if Congress doesn't pass a new one, spending limits from the    2011 law will take effect.  <\/p>\n<p>    In his budget blueprint for 2018,     President Trump proposed raising defense spending levels by $54    billion and cutting the same amount, $54 billion, for    non-defense domestic programs, which cover the    Department of Homeland Security, Department of Veterans Affairs    and Department of Health and Human Services, among others. If    his plan were to become law, domestic programs not related to    defense would face $57 billion in cuts below their current    level of funding.  <\/p>\n<p>    While Congress, including Republicans, declared the president's    budget \"dead on arrival,\" most Republicans agree the military    needs more funding. Many also agree that non-defense domestic    programs don't require spending hikes. Under President Obama,    Democrats only accepted equal increases between both sides of    the budget. But now with a unified Republican government, this    debate over what to increase, and by how much, is expected to    be the biggest sticking point in these negotiations.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"I don't believe all dollars are the same. I think defense    dollars are the absolute priority right now,\" said Rep. Kay    Granger, R-Texas, following a closed-door GOP conference    meeting about the budget agenda. Granger chairs a subcommittee    that oversees Pentagon funding.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, signaled that he'd support a    bipartisan budget deal that also raises the debt ceiling,    saying he would be \"agreeable to anything that increases    defense spending.\" But asked if he'd also be in favor of    domestic spending increases, he wasn't as adamant.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"No, no, no, no,\" McCain said. \"Although there are some that I    would increase: the CIA, the FBI, Homeland Security and those,    but I don't think that some of our domestic programs are in the    same level of urgency as defense is. This is the same strategy    that gave us sequestration: treat them all the same. That's    crazy.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Kentucky, ranking member on the House    Budget Committee, said that a budget deal that only raises    spending limits on defense is out of the question.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Absolutely not,\" he told CBS News. \"That would be a    non-starter. I don't think there would be any Democratic votes    for that.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    A leader of the moderate Tuesday Group, Rep. Charlie Dent,    R-Pennsylvania, is urging his colleagues to craft a bipartisan    budget deal that raises the debt limit and lifts both spending    levels for defense and non-defense, satisfying Democratic    demands.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"It's unrealistic to think that we're going to be able to    increase defense entirely at the expense of non-defense,\" Dent    said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Neither Ryan's office nor McConnell's office responded to    requests for comment.  <\/p>\n<p>    While a budget deal would increase spending caps, Congress    would still need to pass an appropriations package that    complies with those new limits. And despite GOP control of the    White House and Congress, Democratic votes will be needed to    advance a budget agreement that in turn would determine    spending levels for an appropriations package. Both pieces of    legislation require 60 votes in the Senate in order to reach a    final vote.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"If you're going to prevent a government shutdown in September,    you have got to have renegotiated budget caps,\" Dyer said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Experts suspect Congress will, as they've done each year in    recent memory, pass a continuing resolution (CR) by Sept. 30 to    prevent a government shutdown to buy more time for the larger    negotiation that would eventually determine the substance of a    2018 government spending package in December.  <\/p>\n<p>    A budget deal that raises spending limits and debt ceiling    won't be a \"grand bargain,\" said Bill Hoagland, senior vice    president at the Bipartisan Policy Center, who spent 25 years    on Capitol Hill working on budget issues and appropriations.    But he said it might encompass \"modest modifications to the tax    code,\" rather than a comprehensive tax reform package.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The debt limit, the funding of the government, health care and    maybe a little bit on the tax side will all be front and center    come this fall and this is the opportunity for some tradeoffs,\"    he said. \"[As for] the man who wrote the book \"The Art of the    Deal,\" this is when we'll have to see whether or not he can    really pull off a deal and pull all these pieces together.\"  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/will-the-government-fall-off-the-fiscal-cliff\/\" title=\"Will the government fall off the fiscal cliff? - CBS News\">Will the government fall off the fiscal cliff? - CBS News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Congress' next few month are likely to be filled with drama, as lawmakers face tackling the debt ceiling, negotiating a new budget deal to lift limits on government spending and trying to head off a government shutdown this fall.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/will-the-government-fall-off-the-fiscal-cliff-cbs-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187823],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fiscal-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196979"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196979"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196979\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}