\"Adaptation has to become a more active part of the discussion,\" said Jason Grumet, president of the Bipartisan Policy Center, a centrist Washington think tank. \"One thing is to recognize adaptation is not a question of defeat. Adaptation is the reality that is already taking place.\" <\/p>\n
To be clear, in many areas of the U.S. and around the world, government and business leaders are considering or already pursuing policies to prepare for a warmer planet, particularly higher sea levels and more extreme storms. Many examples exist, and here are three: <\/p>\n
These efforts are taking a backseat to America's obsession with the binary fight over whether or not to curb greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuels. Judging by the reaction to Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris deal, one would think it was the only answer to solving climate change. But actually, nothing and nobody can solve climate change. Even if the world stopped burning fossil fuels tomorrow, \"many aspects of climate change and associated impacts will continue for centuries,\" according to the United Nations. <\/p>\n
This isn't to suggest abandoning efforts to slow the worst impacts of climate change. It should be an \"and\" proposition, not \"either\/or.\" Countries, companies and others should keep developing technologies and policies to use more renewable energy, nuclear power and cleaner burning fossil-fuel resources. The debate between whether to focus on stopping climate change versus adapting to it has persisted for years within the wonky climate policy world. It's suddenly relevant to more people now with Trump cutting the U.S. out of the Paris deal and deflating hopes of comprehensive global action to curb emissions. <\/p>\n
Talking about adapting to climate change is easier said than done (and it's not even easy to talk about). That's for a few reasons: <\/p>\n
Grumet and Coequyt both say talking more about adapting to climate change will help provide people with more information about an issue that's otherwise hard to grasp on an individual level. \"Talking about adaptation helps people understand in a more tangible manner why we need to address this problem,\" Coequyt said. <\/p>\n
One last ironic thing: A golf course in Ireland owned by one of Trump's companies applied for a sea wall application and specifically cited the consequences of global warming, Politico reported last year in a highly cited article. Proof, at least, that the president's willing to engage in activities to address climate change even if he isn't willing to admit it's a problem. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Go here to read the rest: <\/p>\n
Why Japan is encouraging automation - Axios<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \"Adaptation has to become a more active part of the discussion,\" said Jason Grumet, president of the Bipartisan Policy Center, a centrist Washington think tank. Continue reading