{"id":196005,"date":"2017-06-01T22:39:15","date_gmt":"2017-06-02T02:39:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/is-ai-the-end-of-jobs-or-a-new-beginning-washington-post\/"},"modified":"2017-06-01T22:39:15","modified_gmt":"2017-06-02T02:39:15","slug":"is-ai-the-end-of-jobs-or-a-new-beginning-washington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/is-ai-the-end-of-jobs-or-a-new-beginning-washington-post\/","title":{"rendered":"Is AI the end of jobs or a new beginning? &#8211; Washington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is advancing so rapidly that even    its developers are being caught off guard. Google co-founder    Sergey Brin     said in Davos, Switzerland, in January that it touches    every single one of our main projects, ranging from search to    photos to ads everything we do  it definitely surprised    me, even though I was sitting right there.  <\/p>\n<p>    The     long-promised AI, the stuff weve seen in science fiction,    is coming and we need to be prepared. Today, AI is powering    voice assistants such as Google Home, Amazon Alexa and Apple    Siri, allowing them to have increasingly natural conversations    with us and manage our lights, order food and schedule    meetings. Businesses are infusing AI into their products to    analyze the vast amounts of data and improve decision-making.    In a decade or two, we will have robotic assistants that remind    us of Rosie from The Jetsons and R2-D2 of Star Wars.  <\/p>\n<p>    This has profound implications for how we live and work, for    better and worse. AI is going to become our guide and companion     and take millions of     jobs away from people. We can deny this is happening, be    angry or simply ignore it. But if we do, we will be the losers.    As I discussed in my new book, Driver    in the Driverless Car, technology is now advancing on an    exponential curve and making science fiction a reality. We    cant stop it. All we can do is to understand it and use it to    better ourselves  and humanity.  <\/p>\n<p>    Rosie and R2-D2 may be on their way but AI is still very    limited in its capability, and will be for a long time. The    voice assistants are examples of what technologists call narrow    AI: systems that are useful, can interact with humans and bear    some of the hallmarks of intelligence  but would never be    mistaken for a human. They can, however, do a better job    on a very specific range of tasks than humans can. I couldnt,    for example, recall the winning and losing pitcher in every    baseball game of the major leagues from the previous night.  <\/p>\n<p>    Narrow-AI systems are much better than humans at accessing    information stored in complex databases, but their capabilities    exclude creative thought. If you asked Siri to find the    perfect gift for your mother for Valentines Day, she might    make a snarky comment but couldnt venture an educated guess.    If you asked her to write your term paper on the Napoleonic    Wars, she couldnt help. That is where the human element comes    in and where the opportunities are for us to benefit from AI     and stay employed.  <\/p>\n<p>    In his book Deep    Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity    Begins, chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov tells of his    shock and anger at being defeated by IBMs Deep Blue    supercomputer in 1997. He acknowledges that he is a sore loser    but was clearly traumatized by having a machine outsmart him.    He was aware of the evolution of the technology but never    believed it would beat him at his own game. After coming to    grips with his defeat, 20 years later, he says fail-safes are    required  but so is courage.  <\/p>\n<p>    Kasparov wrote: When I sat across from Deep Blue twenty years    ago I sensed something new, something unsettling. Perhaps you    will experience a similar feeling the first time you ride in a    driverless car, or the first time your new computer boss issues    an order at work. We must face these fears in order to get the    most out of our technology and to get the most out of    ourselves. Intelligent machines will continue that process,    taking over the more menial aspects of cognition and elevating    our mental lives toward creativity, curiosity, beauty, and joy.    These are what truly make us human, not any particular activity    or skill like swinging a hammer  or even playing chess.  <\/p>\n<p>    In other words, we better get used to it and ride the wave.  <\/p>\n<p>    Human superiority over animals is based on our ability to    create and use tools. The mental capacity to make things that    improved our chances of survival led to a natural selection of    better toolmakers and tool users. Nearly everything a human    does involves technology. For adding numbers, we used abacuses    and mechanical calculators and now spreadsheets. To improve our    memory, we wrote on stones, parchment and paper, and now have    disk drives and cloud storage.  <\/p>\n<p>    AI is the next step in improving our cognitive functions and    decision-making.  <\/p>\n<p>    Think about it: When was the last time you tried memorizing    your calendar or Rolodex or used a printed map? Just as we    instinctively do everything on our smartphones, we will rely on    AI. We may have forfeited skills such as the ability to add up    the price of our groceries but we are smarter and more    productive. With the help of Google and Wikipedia, we can be    experts on any topic, and these dont make us any dumber than    encyclopedias, phone books and librarians did.  <\/p>\n<p>    A valid concern is that dependence on AI may cause us to    forfeit human creativity. As Kasparov observes, the chess games    on our smartphones are many times more powerful than the    supercomputers that defeated him, yet this didnt cause human    chess players to become less capable  the opposite happened.    There are now stronger chess players all over the world, and    the game is played in a better way.  <\/p>\n<p>    As Kasparov explains: It used to be that young players might    acquire the style of their early coaches. If you worked with a    coach who preferred sharp openings and speculative attacking    play himself, it would influence his pupils to play similarly.     What happens when the early influential coach is a computer?    The machine doesnt care about style or patterns or hundreds of    years of established theory. It counts up the values of the    chess pieces, analyzes a few billion moves, and counts them up    again. It is entirely free of prejudice and doctrine.  The    heavy use of computers for practice and analysis has    contributed to the development of a generation of players who    are almost as free of dogma as the machines with which they    train.  <\/p>\n<p>    Perhaps this is the greatest benefit that AI will bring    humanity can be free of dogma and historical bias; it can do    more intelligent decision-making. And instead of doing    repetitive data analysis and number crunching, human workers    can focus on enhancing their knowledge and being more creative.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See more here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/innovations\/wp\/2017\/05\/31\/is-ai-the-end-of-jobs-or-a-new-beginning\/\" title=\"Is AI the end of jobs or a new beginning? - Washington Post\">Is AI the end of jobs or a new beginning? - Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Artificial Intelligence (AI) is advancing so rapidly that even its developers are being caught off guard.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/is-ai-the-end-of-jobs-or-a-new-beginning-washington-post\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187743],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196005"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196005"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196005\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}