{"id":196001,"date":"2017-06-01T22:39:12","date_gmt":"2017-06-02T02:39:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ais-latest-milestone-could-be-a-mixed-blessing-motley-fool\/"},"modified":"2017-06-01T22:39:12","modified_gmt":"2017-06-02T02:39:12","slug":"ais-latest-milestone-could-be-a-mixed-blessing-motley-fool","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/ais-latest-milestone-could-be-a-mixed-blessing-motley-fool\/","title":{"rendered":"AI&#8217;s Latest Milestone Could Be a Mixed Blessing &#8211; Motley Fool"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Big news for artificial    intelligence watchers: Google's AlphaGo AI has beaten the    world's top-ranked Go player 3-0 at a match in Wuzhen, China.    The AI is a vastly improved version of the one that beat a    legendary 18-time world champion just one year ago.  <\/p>\n<p>    It's a big accomplishment    forAlphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL)(NASDAQ:GOOG).    But the headline isn't the highlight -- it's actually the    manner of AlphaGo's victory that sheds new light on what    the future might hold for the budding AI industry.  <\/p>\n<p>      Ke Jie vs. AlphaGo. Image source: DeepMind.    <\/p>\n<p>    Go, a 3,000-year-old board game, has simple rules. Players take    turns placing a stone on the board. If one player surrounds an    opponent's entire group of stones, the surrounded stones are    captured and removed from the board. The object of the game is    to surround the most empty territory.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite Go's apparent simplicity, the subtlety and complexity    of its strategy and tactics have long confounded AI    researchers. Until last year, it was the only game of perfect    information AI had been unable to master. Never had a machine    come close to beating any professional player.  <\/p>\n<p>    A full-sized 19 by 19 board has 361 positions. Because almost    every empty position is a legal move, there are a vast number    of possible game sequences -- too vast for a human or a    computer to calculate the best move using the same brute force    techniques that IBM's Deep Blue used to master chess. (The    number of possible board states in Go exceeds the number in    chess by a factor of more than the number of atoms in the known    universe.)  <\/p>\n<p>    Playing Go, therefore, requires a kind of intuitive thinking    that computers have difficulty mastering.  <\/p>\n<p>    Alphabet subsidiary DeepMind made a leap in this direction    incorporating machine learning alongside the more traditional    statistical-algorithmic approach known as the Monte Carlo Tree    Search.<\/p>\n<p>    To match the intuitive skills of human players, programmers    taught AlphaGo pattern recognition. They fed AlphaGo data from    millions of internet forum games to teach it to recognize what    good moves \"look\" like. AlphaGo then played against itself    millions of times over several months to further refine its    skills.  <\/p>\n<p>    The latest version of AlphaGo that beat number-one-ranked Ke    Jieis even more impressive than the one that defeated    legendary player Lee Sedollast year. It's now 1,000% more    efficient with computing power and takes mere weeks instead of    months to train.  <\/p>\n<p>    It's also a stronger player. Instead of learning on a data set    of strong human players, DeepMind wiped AlphaGo's memory and    freakishly retrained it entirely on data from millions of games    it had played against itself in the past. Its personality has    also evolved. AlphaGo 2.0 is more tactical, more territorial,    and somewhat more aggressive. It's also added a few more    unusual maneuvers to its arsenal -- for example, a type of    invasion that it plays in situations that any good human player    would perceive as too early.  <\/p>\n<p>    The latest match tells us a lot about the pace of AI    improvement.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ke Jie attempted to unsettle AlphaGo by playing some of its own    unusual strategies and tactics against it. Known for his    extremely accurate and quick ability to read possible game    sequences, Ke Jie also tried to confuse AlphaGo by creating    games so complicated that the computer would have difficulty    keeping up. The second gamespiraled off into eight    simultaneous, interconnected battles spanning the entire board.    But in the end, AlphaGo was able to handle itself.  <\/p>\n<p>      Complex fight in game two. Image source: DeepMind.    <\/p>\n<p>    The 3-0 match result seems to be further vindication for    companies in the AI space, most notably NVIDIA    (NASDAQ:NVDA).    But it may be a mixed blessing for processing manufacturers.    Last year's match featured 1,920 CPUs and 280 of the souped-up    graphics processing units that NVIDIA sells for AI uses.    Despite losing the series, Lee Sedol managed to push all that    processing power to the breaking point.  <\/p>\n<p>    AlphaGo's tenfold efficiency gain in just one year could mean    wider adoption of AI technology and processors, but it would    also suggest a less processing-intensive AI future. Customers    can't just buy the same amount of hardware to get higher    performance -- there are diminishing returns to processing    power.  <\/p>\n<p>    What's more, opportunities attract competition -- Google has    been developing     its own AI processors.  <\/p>\n<p>    Machine-learning AIs are turning to fields with large databases    that combine pattern recognition and strategic reasoning, like    medical diagnostics and treatment, that will also involve some    level of teamwork between trained humans and trained    computers.The summit in Wuzhen contained an unusual game    that foreshadowed the future of AI applications.  <\/p>\n<p>    For the first time, AlphaGo played on a team alongside a human    in a game of \"pair Go.\" Two teams of two play against one    another, each player alternating moves for his\/her teammate (a    little bit like bridge). It can be tricky because players    aren't allowed to communicate with their teammate. They must    understand what their teammate's moves accomplish and what    possible scenarios their teammate may be considering. It's an    interesting way to simulate the tag-team future of man-machine    problem-solving.  <\/p>\n<p>    The teams were Lian Xiao-AlphaGo versus Gu Li-a second AlphaGo.    In the game, the machine both won and lost.  <\/p>\n<p>    Suzanne Frey, an executive    at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of    directors. Ilan    Moscovitz owns shares of Alphabet (A shares) and Alphabet    (C shares). The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends    Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), and Nvidia. The    Motley Fool has a disclosure    policy.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Original post: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/investing\/2017\/06\/01\/ais-latest-milestone-could-be-a-mixed-blessing.aspx\" title=\"AI's Latest Milestone Could Be a Mixed Blessing - Motley Fool\">AI's Latest Milestone Could Be a Mixed Blessing - Motley Fool<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Big news for artificial intelligence watchers: Google's AlphaGo AI has beaten the world's top-ranked Go player 3-0 at a match in Wuzhen, China. The AI is a vastly improved version of the one that beat a legendary 18-time world champion just one year ago. It's a big accomplishment forAlphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL)(NASDAQ:GOOG).  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/ai\/ais-latest-milestone-could-be-a-mixed-blessing-motley-fool\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187743],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196001"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196001\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}