{"id":195828,"date":"2017-06-01T22:12:14","date_gmt":"2017-06-02T02:12:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/heres-why-editas-medicine-fell-as-much-as-15-7-today-motley-fool\/"},"modified":"2017-06-01T22:12:14","modified_gmt":"2017-06-02T02:12:14","slug":"heres-why-editas-medicine-fell-as-much-as-15-7-today-motley-fool","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/gene-medicine\/heres-why-editas-medicine-fell-as-much-as-15-7-today-motley-fool\/","title":{"rendered":"Here&#8217;s Why Editas Medicine Fell as Much as 15.7% Today &#8211; Motley Fool"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>What    happened    <\/p>\n<p>    Shares of gene editing pioneer    Editas Medicine (NASDAQ:EDIT)    dropped nearly 16% today after a new study published in Nature    Methods drew attention to unintended effects of using the    highly touted genetic engineering tool known as CRISPR. Shares    of genome-editing peers CRISPR Therapeutics    (NASDAQ:CRSP)    and Intellia Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NTLA)    were down as much as 6.9% and 14.9%, respectively, on the    news.  <\/p>\n<p>    The study, conducted by a team from Columbia University Medical    Center, provided data showing that the technology can    \"introduce hundreds of unintended mutations into the genome,\"    according to Genetic    Engineering & Biotechnology News. That contradicts    one of the better-known characteristics of CRISPR: precision.  <\/p>\n<p>    Simply put, it's not sitting well with investors, who are (in    knee-jerk fashion) adjusting the value placed on early-stage    platforms, especially Editas Medicine, which will be the first    of the group to enter clinical trials. As of 3:31 p.m. EDT, the    stock had settled to a 11.3% loss.  <\/p>\n<p>      Image source: Getty Images.    <\/p>\n<p>    The study is among    the first to quantify the specificity of CRISPR tools,    which work by delivering gene editing enzymes to specific parts    of the genome through the use of synthetic guide RNAs. Or    that's how they're supposed to work. The authors of the study    show that although intended edits can be made with respectable    efficiency, such as correcting a mutation in a gene that causes    blindness in mice, there are also unintended secondary edits    made to the genome.  <\/p>\n<p>    This may seem like a bombshell report, but it's a matter of    optics. Researchers have never shied away from the reality that    CRISPR gene editing tools can stray off target and make    unintended edits to genomes in mammalian cells (i.e., humans).    Many labs -- including Editas Medicine, CRISPR Therapeutics,    and Intellia Therapeutics -- are working on increasing the    efficiency and specificity of the technology. This is how    science works. By quantifying these off-target mutations, which    the paper attempted to do, researchers can begin to better    understand how to improve the technology.  <\/p>\n<p>    Investors and traders did not take the same cool-headed    approach to the news, instead giving into a knee-jerk reaction    to adjust the value of each pre-clinical technology platform.    While off-target edits could prove troublesome for a CRISPR    therapeutic used in humans, it's important to remember that    there are currently no clinical trials underway in the United    States. Editas Medicine will become the first to initiate a    clinical trial later this year.  <\/p>\n<p>    The sharp contrasts in reactions from researchers and investors    is likely driven by how CRISPR is perceived by the media.    Unfortunately, there is a generous amount of hyped-up science    journalism that sticks to simple narratives -- \"CRISPR has    arrived and will cure all diseases!\" -- instead of more nuanced    takes that give equal weight to each current obstacles and    future potential facing an emerging technology. Just remember:    Biology is never quite so simple.  <\/p>\n<p>    The results from the study don't really change anything, except    for bringing more attention to the already existent clinical    risk inherent to the development of early-stage CRISPR    therapeutics. There is still plenty of work and new technology    left to be developed before gene editing fulfills its promise    in treating and curing human diseases. Hopefully, this can be a    long-term positive for investors in CRISPR stocks by forcing    them to listen to the fundamental hurdles for the technology.    Hopefully.  <\/p>\n<p>    Maxx    Chatsko has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley    Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley    Fool has a disclosure    policy.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the rest here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/investing\/2017\/05\/30\/heres-why-editas-medicine-fell-as-much-as-14-today.aspx\" title=\"Here's Why Editas Medicine Fell as Much as 15.7% Today - Motley Fool\">Here's Why Editas Medicine Fell as Much as 15.7% Today - Motley Fool<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> What happened Shares of gene editing pioneer Editas Medicine (NASDAQ:EDIT) dropped nearly 16% today after a new study published in Nature Methods drew attention to unintended effects of using the highly touted genetic engineering tool known as CRISPR. Shares of genome-editing peers CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and Intellia Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NTLA) were down as much as 6.9% and 14.9%, respectively, on the news.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/gene-medicine\/heres-why-editas-medicine-fell-as-much-as-15-7-today-motley-fool\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gene-medicine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195828"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195828\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}