The euthanasia movement fear mongers its agendaas a means of preventing an agonizing death in pain that cannot be controlled. Its all a false pitch. Thats not why its actually done. <\/p>\n
Rather, existential anguish drives people to seek doctor-administered or prescribed termination.That has been experience in Oregon. Now too, Canada. From a study published in theNew England Journal of Medicine; <\/p>\n
Those who received MAiD[medical aid in dying] tended to be white and relatively affluent and indicated that loss of autonomy was the primary reason for their request. <\/p>\n
Other common reasons included the wish to avoid burdening others or losing dignity and the intolerability of not being able to enjoy ones life. <\/p>\n
Few patients cited inadequate control of pain or other symptoms. <\/p>\n
These are important issues that need to be addressed through vigorous suicide prevention and other mental health interventions. <\/p>\n
But they are not provided. Instead, the desire to die for fear of being a burden or losing autonomy is validated withthe lethal jab or the poison pills. And then, that type of death is pushed toward normalization. <\/p>\n
Not providing vigorous interventions for existential anguish islike depriving a cancer patientof morphine, and then helping her diebecause she is in so much pain. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Follow this link:<\/p>\n
Euthanasia Not About Ending Uncontrollable Pain - National Review<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The euthanasia movement fear mongers its agendaas a means of preventing an agonizing death in pain that cannot be controlled. Its all a false pitch. Thats not why its actually done Continue reading