{"id":195683,"date":"2017-05-30T14:45:03","date_gmt":"2017-05-30T18:45:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/existence-of-naked-singularity-threatens-einsteins-general-theory-of-relativity-wall-street-pit\/"},"modified":"2017-05-30T14:45:03","modified_gmt":"2017-05-30T18:45:03","slug":"existence-of-naked-singularity-threatens-einsteins-general-theory-of-relativity-wall-street-pit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/singularity\/existence-of-naked-singularity-threatens-einsteins-general-theory-of-relativity-wall-street-pit\/","title":{"rendered":"Existence of &#8216;Naked Singularity&#8217; Threatens Einstein&#8217;s General Theory of Relativity &#8211; Wall Street Pit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Existence of Naked Singularity Threatens Einsteins General  Theory of Relativity<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    For 100 years since it was published, Einsteins General Theory    of Relativity has mostly passed every kind of test thrown at    it. Mostly is a keyword here. Because it implies that there    are a few scenarios where the theory doesnt hold up. And one    such case is the existence of singularities.  <\/p>\n<p>    A singularity is defined as a point where the force of gravity    is too overwhelming that the laws of physics break down.    General relativity says that an example of such singularity    exists at the center of a black hole. It also predicts that a    black hole is surrounded by what is referred to as an event    horizon  a.k.a. the point of no return because anything    that passes through it gets devoured by the black hole, and    nothing (not even light) can escape from gravitys super-strong    pull.  <\/p>\n<p>    This necessarily implies that it is virtually impossible to    observe a black hole and its event horizon from the outside or    anywhere near it because whatever is being used will just get    sucked in, right? Theres actually a term for this  cosmic    censorship conjecture. It simply means that a singularity will    always be cloaked from view. This also suggests that outside a    black hole, the singularity within will not have any effect,    and general relativitys predictions will remain intact. In    short, a singularity cant possibly form outside a black hole.  <\/p>\n<p>    Still, theres a name given  should they happen to be real     to a singularity that exists outside a black hole: naked    singularity. Predictions about the existence of such have been    done before, but they are typically based on a five-dimensional    universe. Which is like saying that its impossible for a naked    singularity to exist, at least in the universe we know.  <\/p>\n<p>    So does that mean general relativity will remain uncontested?    Maybe. Maybe not. Because according to research    recently published in the journal Physical Review Letters, its    not just possible for a naked singularity to exist in an    extraordinary (or maybe fictional?) universe; it can exist in a    real universe like ours too.  <\/p>\n<p>    Based on simulations done by physicists Toby Crisford and Jorge    Santos from the University of Cambridge, a four-dimensional    universe (three spatial dimensions plus time as the fourth    dimension just like ours) can host a naked singularity. If it    happens to be saddle-shaped that is.  <\/p>\n<p>    General relativity does allow for universes of different    shapes. And a saddle-shaped one, also called Anti-de Sitter    space, is one of those possible shapes.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the distinguishing features of a saddle-shaped universe    is a point of no return where light doesnt get trapped, but    instead gets reflected back. As described by Crisford to    Phys.org:    Its a bit like having a spacetime in a box. At the boundary,    the walls of the box, we have the freedom to specify what the    various fields are doing, and we use this freedom to add energy    to the system and eventually force the formation of a    singularity.  <\/p>\n<p>    On the other hand, co-author Santos also says that introducing    charged particles in their simulation would probably diminish    the formation of the naked singularity. If true, it could    imply a connection between the cosmic censorship conjecture and    the weak gravity conjecture, which says that any consistent    theory of quantum gravity must contain sufficiently charged    particles. In Anti-de Sitter space, the cosmic censorship    conjecture might be saved by the weak gravity conjecture, he    explains.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its not going to be easy to prove the existence of such an    extremely curved saddle-shaped universe, though. Nonetheless,    just being possible, is already enough to disrupt what we think    we know. And that gives scientists so much more to ponder on,    which could hopefully lead to more explanations eventually,    instead of more questions.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Originally posted here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/wallstreetpit.com\/113525-existence-naked-singularity-threatens-einsteins-general-theory-relativity\/\" title=\"Existence of 'Naked Singularity' Threatens Einstein's General Theory of Relativity - Wall Street Pit\">Existence of 'Naked Singularity' Threatens Einstein's General Theory of Relativity - Wall Street Pit<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Existence of Naked Singularity Threatens Einsteins General Theory of Relativity For 100 years since it was published, Einsteins General Theory of Relativity has mostly passed every kind of test thrown at it. Mostly is a keyword here <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/singularity\/existence-of-naked-singularity-threatens-einsteins-general-theory-of-relativity-wall-street-pit\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187807],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-singularity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195683"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195683"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195683\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}