{"id":195520,"date":"2017-05-30T14:03:02","date_gmt":"2017-05-30T18:03:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/scientists-thought-ancient-egyptian-mummies-didnt-have-any-dna-left-they-were-wrong-science-magazine\/"},"modified":"2017-05-30T14:03:02","modified_gmt":"2017-05-30T18:03:02","slug":"scientists-thought-ancient-egyptian-mummies-didnt-have-any-dna-left-they-were-wrong-science-magazine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/scientists-thought-ancient-egyptian-mummies-didnt-have-any-dna-left-they-were-wrong-science-magazine\/","title":{"rendered":"Scientists thought ancient Egyptian mummies didn&#8217;t have any DNA left. They were wrong &#8211; Science Magazine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>        Scientists successfully sequenced DNA from mummies from the        site of Abusir el-Meleq, one of which was buried in this        sarcophagus.      <\/p>\n<p>      bpk\/Aegyptisches Museum und Papyrussammlung, SMB\/Sandra      Steiss    <\/p>\n<p>    By Lizzie WadeMay. 30, 2017 ,    11:00 AM  <\/p>\n<p>    Ancient Egyptian mummies preserve many details of the deceased:    facial features, signs of illness, even tattoos. But not, it    seemed, DNA. After trying repeatedly to extract it, may    scientists were convinced that the hot desert climate and,    perhaps, the chemicals used in mummification destroyed any    genetic material long ago. Now, a team of ancient DNA    specialists has successfully sequenced genomes from 90 ancient    Egyptian mummies. The game-changing results give scientists    their first insight into the genetics of ordinary ancient    Egyptianswhich changed surprisingly little through centuries    of conquests.  <\/p>\n<p>    The sequencing success, reported    this week in Nature Communications, finally    proves to everyone that theres DNA preserved in ancient    Egyptian mummies, says Albert Zink, a biological    anthropologist at the Institute for Mummy Studies in Bolzano,    Italy. He participated in a 2010 study that identified DNA    sequences from 16 ancient Egyptian royal mummies, including    Tutankhamun. But that study used polymerase chain reaction, a    method that efficiently finds and extracts targeted DNA    fragments but cannot always reliably distinguish between    ancient DNA and modern contamination.  <\/p>\n<p>    The new study, led by Johannes Krause, a geneticist at the Max    Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena,    Germany, used next-generation sequencing methods to read    stretches of any DNA present in a sample and fish    outthose that resembled human DNA. The complete reads    allowed the team to spot tell-tale damage patterns associated    only with ancient DNA. That makes the new analysis much more    reliable, says Hannes Schroeder, an ancient DNA researcher at    the University of Copenhagen. It succeeds where previous    studies on Egyptian mummies have failed or fallen short.  <\/p>\n<p>    Krause, who has studied the DNA of Neandertals, Denisovans, and    prehistoric migrants to Europe, recently gravitated toward    ancient Egyptian mummies because of the empires tumultuous    political history. At various points, it was conquered by    Assyrians from the Near East, Nubians from farther south along    the Nile, Persians, Greeks, and Romans, among others. Our    question was, did those foreign conquests have a genetic    impact? Krause says.  <\/p>\n<p>    Krause turned to a collection of 151 mummy heads from the    ancient settlement of Abusir el-Meleq, about 100 kilometers    south of Cairo along the Nile. The settlement was devoted to    Osiris, the god of the dead, making it a popular burial spot    for many centuries. The heads were excavated (and removed from    their bodies) in the early 20th century and now reside in two    collections in Germany, at the University of Tbingen and    Berlins Museum of Prehistory and Early History. Radiocarbon    dating shows that the mummies span 1300 years of ancient    Egyptian history, during many of the foreign conquests and then    Egypts incorporation into first the Greek and then the Roman    empires.  <\/p>\n<p>    Whereasthe mummies soft tissue contained almost no DNA,    the bones and teeth were chock full of genetic material. Ninety    of the mummies yielded DNA once housed in mitochondria, the    power plants of cells. Mitochondria carry only a few genes, but    they are so plentiful that its often easier to find their DNA    than the single full human genome in a cells nucleus. Still,    because mitochondrial DNA is passed down from mother to child,    it leaves out the story of the fathers DNA. The nuclear    genome, which contains DNA from both parents, is far more    informative. Unfortunately, Krause says, only a few of the    mummies nuclear genomes were well preserved, and even fewer    passed his strict contamination tests. His team ended up with    nuclear genome samples from only three mummies, each from a    different time period.  <\/p>\n<p>    Krauses team compared the mummies mitochondrial and nuclear    DNA to ancient and modern populations in the Near East and    Africa. They discovered that ancient Egyptians closely    resembled ancient and modern Near Eastern populations,    especially those in the Levant. Whats more, the genetics of    the mummies remained remarkably consistent even as different    powers conquered the empire. Its possible that the    mitochondrial genomes simply dont record the genetic    contributions of foreign fathers, says Yehia Gad, a molecular    geneticist at the National Research Centre in Cairo and a    founder of the Egyptian Museums ancient DNA lab who worked    with Zink on past mummy studies. But the three mummies with    nuclear genome data also show striking genetic continuity,    Krause points out.  <\/p>\n<p>    Later, however, something did alter the genomes of Egyptians.    Although the mummies contain almost no DNA from sub-Saharan    Africa, some 15% to 20%of modern Egyptians mitochondrial    DNA reflects sub-Saharan ancestry. Its really unexpected that    we see this very late shift, Krause says. He suspects    increased trade along the Nileincluding the slave tradeor the    spread of Islam in the Middle Ages may have intensified contact    between Northern and sub-Saharan Africa.  <\/p>\n<p>    Geneticist Iosif Lazaridis of Harvard Medical School in Boston,    who studies how and when ancient populations mixed, calls the    new results a big accomplishment. But he wonders how    representative Abusir el-Meleq is of ancient Egypt as a whole.    Egypt is a big place, he says. Other regions may have    experienced its conquests in different ways, some perhaps with    more genetic mixing. But Lazaridis hopes for more revelations    to come. Now thatits been proven that its possible to    sample from mummieswell, there are literally thousands of    mummies.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/news\/2017\/05\/scientists-thought-ancient-egyptian-mummies-didn-t-have-any-dna-left-they-were-wrong\" title=\"Scientists thought ancient Egyptian mummies didn't have any DNA left. They were wrong - Science Magazine\">Scientists thought ancient Egyptian mummies didn't have any DNA left. They were wrong - Science Magazine<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Scientists successfully sequenced DNA from mummies from the site of Abusir el-Meleq, one of which was buried in this sarcophagus. bpk\/Aegyptisches Museum und Papyrussammlung, SMB\/Sandra Steiss By Lizzie WadeMay.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/scientists-thought-ancient-egyptian-mummies-didnt-have-any-dna-left-they-were-wrong-science-magazine\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195520"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195520\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}