{"id":195171,"date":"2017-05-26T04:36:43","date_gmt":"2017-05-26T08:36:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/google-plans-to-demonstrate-the-supremacy-of-quantum-ieee-spectrum\/"},"modified":"2017-05-26T04:36:43","modified_gmt":"2017-05-26T08:36:43","slug":"google-plans-to-demonstrate-the-supremacy-of-quantum-ieee-spectrum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/quantum-computing\/google-plans-to-demonstrate-the-supremacy-of-quantum-ieee-spectrum\/","title":{"rendered":"Google Plans to Demonstrate the Supremacy of Quantum &#8230; &#8211; IEEE Spectrum"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Photo: Erik Lucero Put Chip Here: Google will  put its superconducting quantum computer chip in this  10-millikelvin dilution refrigerator.<\/p>\n<p>    Quantum computers have long held the promise of performing    certain calculations that are impossibleor at least, entirely    impracticalfor even the most powerful conventional computers    to perform. Now, researchers at a Google laboratory in Goleta,    Calif., may finally be on the cusp of proving it, using the    same kinds of quantum bits, or qubits, that one day could make    up large-scale quantum machines.  <\/p>\n<p>    By the end of this year, the team aims to increase the number    of superconducting qubits it builds on    integrated circuits to create a 7-by-7 array. With this quantum    IC, the Google researchers aim to perform operations at the    edge of whats possible with even the best supercomputers, and    so demonstrate quantum supremacy.  <\/p>\n<p>    Weve been talking about, for many years now, how a quantum    processor could be powerful because of the way that quantum    mechanics works, but we want to specifically demonstrate it,    says team member John    Martinis, a professor at the University of California,    Santa Barbara, who joined Google in 2014.  <\/p>\n<p>    A system size of 49 superconducting qubits is still far away    from what physicists think will be needed to perform the sorts    of computations that have long motivated quantum computing    research. One of those is Shors algorithm, a computational    scheme that would enable a quantum computer to quickly factor    very large numbers and thus crack one of the foundational    components of modern cryptography. In a recent commentary in    Nature, Martinis and colleagues estimated that a    100-million-qubit system would be needed to factor a 2,000-bit    numbera not-uncommon public key lengthin one day. Most of    those qubits would be used to create the special quantum states    that would be needed to perform the computation and to correct    errors, creating a mere thousand or so stable logical qubits    from thousands of less stable physical components, Martinis    says.  <\/p>\n<p>    There will be no such extra infrastructure in this 49-qubit    system, which means a different computation must be performed    to establish supremacy. To demonstrate the chips superiority    over conventional computers, the Google team will execute    operations on the array that will cause it to evolve    chaotically and produce what looks like a random output.    Classical machines can simulate this output for smaller    systems. In April, for example, Lawrence Berkeley National    Laboratory     reported that its 29-petaflop supercomputer, Cori, had    simulated the output of 45 qubits. But 49 qubits would pushif    not exceedthe limits of conventional supercomputers.  <\/p>\n<p>    This computation does not as yet have a clear practical    application. But Martinis says there are reasons beyond    demonstrating quantum supremacy to pursue this approach. The    qubits used to make the 49-qubit array can also be used to make    larger universal quantum systems with error correction, the    sort that could do things like decryption, so the chip should    provide useful validation data.  <\/p>\n<p>    Photo: Erik Lucero Steps to Supremacy:    Googles quantum computing chip is a 2-by-3 array of qubits.    The company hopes to make a 7-by-7 array later this year.  <\/p>\n<p>    There may also be, the team suspects, untapped computational    potential in systems with little or no error correction. It    would be wonderful if this were true, because then we could    have useful products right away instead of waiting for a long    time, says Martinis. One potential application, the team    suggests, could be in the simulation of chemical reactions and    materials.  <\/p>\n<p>    Google recently performed a dry run of the approach on a 9-by-1    array of qubits and tested out some fabrication technology on a    2-by-3 array. Scaling up the number of qubits will happen in    stages. This is a challenging system engineering problem,    Martinis says. We have to scale it up, but the qubits still    have to work well. We cant have any loss in fidelity, any    increase in error rates, and I would say error rates and    scaling tend to kind of compete against each other. Still, he    says, the team thinks there could be a way to scale up systems    well past 50qubits even without error correction.  <\/p>\n<p>    Google is not the only company working on building larger    quantum systems without error correction. In March, IBM        unveiled a plan to create such a superconducting qubit    system in the next few years, also with roughly 50qubits,    and to make it accessible on the cloud. Fifty is a magic    number, says Bob Sutor, IBMs vice president for this area,    because thats around the point where quantum    computers will start to outstrip classical computers for    certain tasks.  <\/p>\n<p>    The quality of superconducting qubits has advanced a lot over    the years since D-Wave Systems began offering commercial    quantum computers, says Scott Aaronson, a professor    of computer science at the University of Texas at Austin.    D-Wave, based in Burnaby, B.C., Canada, has claimed that its    systems offer a speedup over conventional machines, but    Aaronson says there has been no convincing demonstration of    that. Google, he says, is clearly aiming for a demonstration of    quantum supremacy that is not something youll have to squint    and argue about.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its still unclear whether there are useful tasks a    50-or-so-qubit chip could perform, Aaronson says. Nor is it    certain whether systems can be made bigger without error    correction. But he says quantum supremacy will be an important    milestone nonetheless, one that is a natural offshoot of the    effort to make large-scale, universal quantum machines: I    think that it is absolutely worth just establishing as clearly    as we can that the world does work this way. Certainly, if we    can do it as a spin-off of technology that will be useful    eventually in its own right, then why the hell not?  <\/p>\n<p>    This article appears in the June 2017 print issue as    Google Aims for Quantum Computing Supremacy.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continue reading here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/spectrum.ieee.org\/computing\/hardware\/google-plans-to-demonstrate-the-supremacy-of-quantum-computing\" title=\"Google Plans to Demonstrate the Supremacy of Quantum ... - IEEE Spectrum\">Google Plans to Demonstrate the Supremacy of Quantum ... - IEEE Spectrum<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Photo: Erik Lucero Put Chip Here: Google will put its superconducting quantum computer chip in this 10-millikelvin dilution refrigerator. Quantum computers have long held the promise of performing certain calculations that are impossibleor at least, entirely impracticalfor even the most powerful conventional computers to perform. Now, researchers at a Google laboratory in Goleta, Calif., may finally be on the cusp of proving it, using the same kinds of quantum bits, or qubits, that one day could make up large-scale quantum machines.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/quantum-computing\/google-plans-to-demonstrate-the-supremacy-of-quantum-ieee-spectrum\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[257742],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-quantum-computing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195171"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195171"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195171\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}