A tweet last week from Project Nosh set my food-labeling-lawyer-head buzzing: Consumers are looking for snacks that arent just empty calories. Brands are providing everything from protein to anti-nausea properties. An anti-nausea claim on a food label can they say that? <\/p>\n
As consumers more fully embrace the idea of food as medicine, and food companies jump to respond, food companies will find themselves asking that question, often stumbling through the fog of the Food and Drug Administrations (FDA) labeling-claims regulations in their efforts to market their products. Food companies that want to tout the health benefits of their products should take care to ensure that their claims do not get them into hot water, legally speaking. <\/p>\n
One category of labeling claims causes the most confusioncalled structure\/function claimsand is where that anti-nausea claim may fall.[1] The FDA explains that structure\/function claims describe the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient intended to affect the structure or function in humans or that characterize the documented mechanism by which a nutrient or dietary ingredient acts to maintain such structure or function, provided that such statements are not disease claims. <\/p>\n
Basically, the FDA is saying you can talk about ways your food supports health, but dont make claims that would make your product a drug. But, of course, what constitutes a drug claim isnt always clear either. The FDA has provided ten criteria in a guidance document to help food companies determine whether a particular statement is a structure\/function claim or a drug claim. <\/p>\n
Some criteria are more obviouse.g., a statement that mentions a specific disease or class of diseases (e.g., protective against the development of cancer). On the other hand, some are less cleare.g., a statement that claims an effect on a condition associated with a natural state or process (e.g., helps with mild mood changes and cramps associated with the menstrual cycle versus helps with severe depression associated with the menstrual cycle). Additionally, a claim doesnt have to mention a disease explicitly; pictures, vignettes, and other implications can cause a statement to be characterized as a drug claim. <\/p>\n
Further complicating things is the application of different requirements based on whether the product is a conventional food or a dietary supplement. Structure\/function claims on conventional foods are limited to statements about the products nutritive value, while structure\/function claims on dietary supplements can additionally focus on a products non-nutritive benefits. <\/p>\n
Dietary supplements carrying structure\/function claims must add a disclaimer that the claims have not been evaluated by the FDA and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease, while structure\/function claims on conventional food are not required to bear the disclaimer. Structure\/function claims on dietary supplements must be submitted to the FDA 30-days after first marketing the product, whereas conventional foods can use structure\/function claims without notifying the FDA. Finally, of course, all structure\/function claims require substantiation that is, both food and supplement companies must be able to show the FDA that the claims made on the label are true based on competent and reliable scientific evidence. <\/p>\n
Dietary supplements carrying structure\/function claims must add a disclaimer that the claims have not been evaluated by the FDA and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease, while structure\/function claims on conventional food are not required to bear the disclaimer. <\/p>\n
Back to Project Noshs tweet: most of the claims food companies want to make about the health benefits of their products will fall into the structure\/function category. It behooves food companies to carefully consider any claims theyd like to make on their product labels that might fall into the structure\/function category of claims. The anti-nausea properties mentioned in Project Noshs tweet, if on a label, might make the FDA characterize the food product a drug. However, without more information about the product and the claim, it is difficult to know for sure. After all this thinking about structure\/function claims, my head is spinning. Do they have a food for that? <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read more:<\/p>\n
Let Food Be Thy Medicine, But Mind Your Words - Lexology (registration)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A tweet last week from Project Nosh set my food-labeling-lawyer-head buzzing: Consumers are looking for snacks that arent just empty calories. Brands are providing everything from protein to anti-nausea properties. An anti-nausea claim on a food label can they say that Continue reading