{"id":194810,"date":"2017-05-26T03:47:28","date_gmt":"2017-05-26T07:47:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/leading-from-the-side-at-nato-event-trump-waffles-again-on-us-commitments-washington-post\/"},"modified":"2017-05-26T03:47:28","modified_gmt":"2017-05-26T07:47:28","slug":"leading-from-the-side-at-nato-event-trump-waffles-again-on-us-commitments-washington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nato-2\/leading-from-the-side-at-nato-event-trump-waffles-again-on-us-commitments-washington-post\/","title":{"rendered":"Leading from the side: At NATO event, Trump waffles again on US commitments &#8211; Washington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    At a NATO ceremony in Brussels on Thursday, President Trump    appeared, in a moment captured on video, to push aside another    world leader to get a spot at the front. That prompted pundits to joke that after    eight years of Barack Obamas cautious foreign policy, the    United States was no longer leading from behind.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Trumps remarks at the event celebrating the Article 5    mutual defense treaty left the impression of a president who    continues to lead from the side  with one foot in and one foot    out when it comes to U.S. multilateral commitments.  <\/p>\n<p>    Whether its NATO, the Paris climate pact, the Iran nuclear    deal or the NAFTA trade accord, the Trump administration has    wavered and equivocated, failing to offer a full-throated    endorsement and allowing such agreements to continue in an    awkward state of limbo    without U.S. leadership and nourishment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thursdays ceremony at the new NATO headquarters was supposed    to put an end to the uncertainty among U.S. allies and partners    in Europe. Trumps aides had laid the groundwork, hinting to reporters that the president, who    had questioned the security alliance during his campaign, would    directly endorse Article 5.  <\/p>\n<p>    Instead, Trump found no space to do so in his 900-word    address, as he stood next to a new monument symbolizing the    treaty  a twisted piece of metal from the World Trade Center    after it was destroyed in the Sept.11, 2001, terrorist    attack in New York City.  <\/p>\n<p>    Article 5 was invoked by NATO for the first time after the    attacks that day.  <\/p>\n<p>    I was fully convinced he would do it because its very    simple, said Thomas Wright, a Europe expert at the Brookings    Institution. It was the perfect time, standing aside the    wreckage. ... Its very surprising he didnt do it. I think    its a real problem for him. It automatically turns the trip    into a failure from a policy point of view.  <\/p>\n<p>    [Trump chastises    NATO members, demands they meet payment obligations]  <\/p>\n<p>    The critical reaction, which came quickly on social media,    forced White House aides to try to clean up after the    president. Speaking to reporters in Brussels, press secretary    Sean Spicer said that Trumps participation in the event    demonstrated his support.  <\/p>\n<p>    I think its a bit silly, Spicer said, adding that the idea    of Trump having to reaffirm his administrations support for    Article 5 while he was attending a ceremony celebrating it is    almost laughable.  <\/p>\n<p>    Trump campaigned on a nationalist agenda that promised to put    America first, and he expressed deep skepticism of the    U.S.-led multilateral institutions that emerged after World War    II.  <\/p>\n<p>    Since he assumed office, however, Trump has failed to follow    through on some of his most extreme rhetoric to withdraw the    United States from global partnerships, other than the    Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, which he scrapped in his    first week. He has emphasized the importance of NATO during    remarks at the White House.  <\/p>\n<p>    His reluctance to blow up the agreements has been widely viewed    as a realization by a new president that complicated global    problems  including terrorism and North Koreas nuclear threat     require broad-based international cooperation. It also has    been seen as an example of the rising influence of    more-moderate factions within a West Wing racked by infighting    among advisers with roots in Wall Street and those with more    populist convictions.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Trump has continued to denounce what he views as an unfair    system that puts undue burdens on the United States. He chided    NATO partners during his remarks Thursday for failing to devote    2 percent of their nations budgets to defense to meet a goal    established by the organization.  <\/p>\n<p>    For NATO countries, the upshot is that their relations with the    Trump administration continue to be defined by uncertainty and    anxiety even as the president wraps up a maiden foreign trip    this weekend that aimed to reaffirm U.S. global leadership.  <\/p>\n<p>    It creates a hedging behavior, said Ian Bremmer, president of    the Eurasia Group, a global risk consulting firm, pointing to    countries such as Germany and France that have long had close    relations with the United States.  <\/p>\n<p>    [Trump pushes back    past Montenegros prime minister]  <\/p>\n<p>    Trumps posture makes it more likely these countries are going    their own way, Bremmer said. There will be some move towards    more coordination of European-only security, and there will be    less coordination with the United States.  <\/p>\n<p>    Trumps aides insist that his foreign policy is purposely    unpredictable, aimed at keeping other countries off balance and    giving the United States an edge  at the bargaining table or    on the battlefield. The presidents threats last month to    withdraw from    NAFTA resulted in the leaders of Canada and Mexico    reportedly agreeing in principle to engage in talks to amend    the terms of the 23-year-old trade accord.  <\/p>\n<p>    In many cases, however, it is not even clear what is being    negotiated.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ahead of Trumps attendance at Fridays Group of Seven summit    in Sicily, negotiators have been trying to get the United    States to sign a joint statement that would walk the    administration closer to endorsing the Paris climate pact inked    in 2015 to reduce carbon emissions.  <\/p>\n<p>    Trump denounced the deal during the campaign and has moved to    reverse Obama-era regulations on automobiles and power plants.    Inside the West Wing, advisers are sharply divided over whether    to end U.S. support for the Paris deal.  <\/p>\n<p>    Andrew Light, who served as a senior adviser on climate change    at the State Department in the Obama administration, said    things look promising for a joint statement on climate at the    G-7 summit. But Light emphasized that even if the United States    signs on, it would not be a direct reaffirmation of the Paris    accord.  <\/p>\n<p>    Therefore, he said, it will remain uncertain where Trump stands    unless he personally voices clear support during the summit.  <\/p>\n<p>    Theres a lot of hesitation to put out a clear statement of    policy among the Trump administration, said Light, now a    senior fellow at the World Resources Institute. Its not    policy unless the president says it is.  <\/p>\n<p>    Rivals have spotted openings in Trumps equivocations. China    has promoted its    commitment not just to global free trade agreements but    also to the Paris climate pact, while U.S. allies in its sphere    of influence  including the Philippines and Australia  have    looked to deepen ties with Beijing. Although the    hedging    began under the Obama administration, analysts said, it has    sped up under Trump.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some analysts said that it is becoming clearer that regardless    of the ongoing policy divisions within the West Wing, Trump is    fundamentally skeptical of multilateralism and will remain    hostile to such agreements.  <\/p>\n<p>    I dont think this is about sending a message to his base to    get their support  its a conviction, said Wright, the    Brookings analyst. I always thought Trump was more ideological    than people think on a small number of things. This is one of    them.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to see the original:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/leading-from-the-side-at-nato-event-trump-waffles-again-on-us-commitments\/2017\/05\/25\/0e65f1b6-415f-11e7-9869-bac8b446820a_story.html\" title=\"Leading from the side: At NATO event, Trump waffles again on US commitments - Washington Post\">Leading from the side: At NATO event, Trump waffles again on US commitments - Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> At a NATO ceremony in Brussels on Thursday, President Trump appeared, in a moment captured on video, to push aside another world leader to get a spot at the front. That prompted pundits to joke that after eight years of Barack Obamas cautious foreign policy, the United States was no longer leading from behind. But Trumps remarks at the event celebrating the Article 5 mutual defense treaty left the impression of a president who continues to lead from the side with one foot in and one foot out when it comes to U.S.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nato-2\/leading-from-the-side-at-nato-event-trump-waffles-again-on-us-commitments-washington-post\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94882],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-194810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nato-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194810"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=194810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194810\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=194810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=194810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=194810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}