{"id":194551,"date":"2017-05-23T22:57:14","date_gmt":"2017-05-24T02:57:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/secretary-of-state-rex-tillersons-political-correctness-algemeiner\/"},"modified":"2017-05-23T22:57:14","modified_gmt":"2017-05-24T02:57:14","slug":"secretary-of-state-rex-tillersons-political-correctness-algemeiner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/political-correctness\/secretary-of-state-rex-tillersons-political-correctness-algemeiner\/","title":{"rendered":"Secretary of State Rex Tillerson&#8217;s Political Correctness &#8211; Algemeiner"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Email a copy of \"Secretary of State Rex  Tillersons Political Correctness\" to a friend<\/p>\n<p>      US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. Photo: Exxon Mobil via      Wikimedia Commons.    <\/p>\n<p>    While the election of President Donald Trump represented a    setback to political correctness, Secretary of State Rex    Tillersons interview on the May 14 episode    ofNBCs Meet the Press reflected his    departments ongoing political correctness    regardingUS-Israel and US-Arab relations, the Palestinian    issue and the relocation of the US embassy to Jerusalem.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the interview, Tillersonembraced the State    Departments zero-sum game philosophy. Heassumed that    enhanced US-Israel relations would undermine US-Arab relations     even thoughUS-Israel geo-strategic cooperation    andUS-Arab security cooperation have bothsurged    dramatically in recent years, while Israel has also engaged in    unprecedented counter-terrorism efforts in concert    withSaudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Jordan and Egypt. All    this, despite the lack of progress on the Palestinian front.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yet, Tillerson also seemed to subscribe to Foggy Bottoms view    that the Palestinian issue is a core cause of the Arab-Israeli    conflict and Middle Eastern turbulence, as well as a top    priority for Arab policy-makers.Contrary to this    conventional Western wisdom, the pro-US Arab regimes    distinguish between challenges which are primary (e.g., the    Iranian threat) and secondary\/tertiary (e.g., the Palestinian    issue). Therefore, when the machetes of Irans ayatollahs and    other Islamic terrorists are at their throats, the pro-US Arab    regimes recognize that Israel is the only reliable life    insurance agent in the Middle East, regardless of the    Palestinian issue.  <\/p>\n<p>        May 23, 2017 8:39 pm      <\/p>\n<p>    Indeed, again contrary to the State Departments conventional    wisdom, Arab leaders since 1948 have exhibitedintense    pro-Palestinian talk, but anti-Palestinian, or at the least    indifferent, walk.  <\/p>\n<p>    No Arab-Israeli war hasever been ignited by the    Palestinian issue, as highlighted by the conclusion of the    1948-49 war, at which point Egypt, Jordan, Iraq and Syria    occupied Gaza, Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) and Al-Hama     but never contemplated transferring these areas    toPalestinian control and, in fact, strictly    constrainedPalestinian activities.  <\/p>\n<p>    In addition, none of the recent Arab tectonic eruptions from    Tunisia, in Northeastern Africa, through Egypt, Syria, Yemen,    Iraq and Bahrain in the Persian Gulf are related, directly or    indirectly, to the Palestinian issue.  <\/p>\n<p>    Tillersonalso seemed to send a message    thatprocrastination isUS policy onthe embassy    relocation issue,which Arabs may interpret as American    retreat in the face of pressure and threats, thus eroding the    US posture of deterrence and emboldening anti-American Islamic    terrorism. Additionally, Tillerson insinuated that moving the    embassy to western Jerusalem  which is within the boundaries    of pre-1967 Israel  could undermine the peaceprocess,    thus providing a tailwind tothe 69-year old State    Department view (which contradicts the position of the American    people and their representatives in the House and Senate) that    there is no legitimacy to Israels sovereignty over any part of    Jerusalem. This positionradicalizes the Arabs as it    forces them to outdo the US position andtake an even more    maximalist approach.  <\/p>\n<p>    Furthermore, any fear that moving the embassy would result in    anti-US Islamic terrorism fails to recognize that such terror    hasbeen totally divorced from the Palestinian issue and    Israel: the 1983 bombings of the US Embassy in Lebanon and of    US Marine barracks in Beirut(368 killed in the two    attacks) occurred at a time when the US was badgering Israel    over its hot pursuit of the PLO. Meanwhile, the1998    car-bombing of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania (224    persons murdered) and the October 2000 suicide attack on the    USS Cole while it was refueling in a Yemen harbor (17    murdered), occurred asPresident Clinton refrained from    relocating the US embassy to Jerusalem, as prescribed by 1995    legislation, and while Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak    offered the Palestinians a full Israeli withdrawal, including    from Jerusalems Temple Mount.  <\/p>\n<p>    In contrast to recent Arab rhetoricand State Department    political correctness, the Arab countries have never considered    Jerusalem to be theircapital, main cultural center or top    holy city  status reserved for Mecca and Medina. Indeed,    Jerusalem was largely neglected during Islamic rule, serving at    most as a political platform in their conflicts with the    infidel.  <\/p>\n<p>    Reality-based political incorrectness motivated Israel and    Egypt in 1977, in defiance of then-US President Jimmy Carter,    to negotiate and conclude a bilateral peace accord with no    Palestinian, regional or international involvement. It also    motivated Israel and Jordan in 1994 to conclude another    bilateral peace accord. The US played a critical deal-closing    role in both cases, but only after the two parties reached the    framework of bilateral agreement.  <\/p>\n<p>    Moreover, a litany of peace initiatives launched by the US    failed when attempting to subordinate reality to the USs own    benevolent political correctness, which stipulated a    multilateral peace process, focusing on the Palestinian issue.  <\/p>\n<p>    Will President Trump and Secretary Tillerson embrace Middle    East reality and reject political correctness by avoiding    procrastination on the relocation of the US embassy to    Jerusalem, thus sparing the US further erosion of its posture    of deterrence in the Middle East and beyond?  <\/p>\n<p>    A version of this article originally appeared in Israel    Hayom.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.algemeiner.com\/2017\/05\/22\/secretary-of-state-rex-tillersons-political-correctness\/\" title=\"Secretary of State Rex Tillerson's Political Correctness - Algemeiner\">Secretary of State Rex Tillerson's Political Correctness - Algemeiner<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Email a copy of \"Secretary of State Rex Tillersons Political Correctness\" to a friend US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. Photo: Exxon Mobil via Wikimedia Commons. While the election of President Donald Trump represented a setback to political correctness, Secretary of State Rex Tillersons interview on the May 14 episode ofNBCs Meet the Press reflected his departments ongoing political correctness regardingUS-Israel and US-Arab relations, the Palestinian issue and the relocation of the US embassy to Jerusalem <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/political-correctness\/secretary-of-state-rex-tillersons-political-correctness-algemeiner\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187751],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-194551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-political-correctness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194551"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=194551"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194551\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=194551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=194551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=194551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}