{"id":192968,"date":"2017-05-14T17:34:30","date_gmt":"2017-05-14T21:34:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/prejudiced-people-invoke-free-speech-to-mask-their-racism-says-study-big-think\/"},"modified":"2017-05-14T17:34:30","modified_gmt":"2017-05-14T21:34:30","slug":"prejudiced-people-invoke-free-speech-to-mask-their-racism-says-study-big-think","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/prejudiced-people-invoke-free-speech-to-mask-their-racism-says-study-big-think\/","title":{"rendered":"Prejudiced People Invoke Free Speech to Mask Their Racism, Says Study &#8211; Big Think"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    A new study says that some people who claim to be for free    speech when defending racist language do not really care about    all speech, just the speech which agrees with their point of    view. In fact, the researchers say that in such cases it often comes down    to racists defending racists.  <\/p>\n<p>    The study was carried out by the graduate student in psychology    Mark H. White and psychology Professor Christian Grandall from    the University of Kansas. They found explicit racial    prejudice to be a pretty good predictor whether someone would    use the free speech defense to defend racist    attitudes.  <\/p>\n<p>    The study saw that those with high levels of prejudice were    very concerned with freedom of expression. They were also less    likely to defend free speech in principle when faced with    non-racial scenarios, suggesting that freedom of speech was    more of a convenient rhetorical point, utilized when it suited    them.  <\/p>\n<p>      When people make appeals to democratic principles  like      freedom of speech  they dont always represent a genuine      interest in that principle, said White. We think of      principles as ideas we use to guide behavior in our everyday      lives. Our data show something different  that we tend to      make up our mind on something based on our attitudes  in      this case, racial attitudes  and then decide that the      principle is relevant or irrelevant. People do whatever best      fits their pre-existing attitudes.    <\/p>\n<p>    One way that people soften the appearance of their prejudices    is by latching on to larger political causes like free    speech. This allows people, the study found, to buffer racial    and hate speech from normative disapproval. Basically, doing    this can make it seem like your prejudice is ok and somewhat    accepted by society.  <\/p>\n<p>    This conclusion is sure to be controversial for its    implications. The balance between fighting prejudice and the    necessity of free speech in a democracy has been increasingly    tested in todays America. A number of high-profile rightwing    speakers have met violent opposition on college campuses, which    resulted in some speeches like Ann Coulters being cancelled. Appearances by the white    nationalist Richard Spencer have drawn much soul-searching and    changed policies. Many in the conservative    media (and even President Trump) defended such provocative personalities as    Milo Yiannopoulos using the free speech position, after his    appearance at Berkeley met with significant protests.  <\/p>\n<p>    The study consisted of eight experiments with hundreds of    participants, who were recruited from Amazons Mechanical Turk    service. They were made to respond to news of racist incidents    or situations like someone getting fired for racist speech. The    reactions were scored according to the standard Henry and Sears    Symbolic Racism 2000 scale.   <\/p>\n<p>    The researchers observed a positive statistical correlation    between racial prejudice and standing up for racist attitudes    by arguing the need for free speech. Interestingly,    those who scored low on prejudiced opinions actually avoided    standing up for free speech in race-related situations.  <\/p>\n<p>    The researchers point out that it would be irresponsible to    paint everyone who makes free speech arguments as somehow    prejudiced.  <\/p>\n<p>      However, our data do show that racial prejudice is one of      the many attitudes that go into people deciding to make this      argument. We should not ignore the free speech defense, but      we shouldnt assume that the motives are purely based on an      abstract democratic principle, either, said White.    <\/p>\n<p>    You can read the study Freedom of Racist Speech: Ego and    Expressive Threats in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/bigthink.com\/paul-ratner\/study-free-speech-advocates-often-support-the-ideas-they-like-not-all-speech\" title=\"Prejudiced People Invoke Free Speech to Mask Their Racism, Says Study - Big Think\">Prejudiced People Invoke Free Speech to Mask Their Racism, Says Study - Big Think<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A new study says that some people who claim to be for free speech when defending racist language do not really care about all speech, just the speech which agrees with their point of view. In fact, the researchers say that in such cases it often comes down to racists defending racists. The study was carried out by the graduate student in psychology Mark H <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/prejudiced-people-invoke-free-speech-to-mask-their-racism-says-study-big-think\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162383],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-192968","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom-of-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192968"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=192968"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192968\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=192968"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=192968"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=192968"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}