{"id":192942,"date":"2017-05-14T17:26:49","date_gmt":"2017-05-14T21:26:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/new-bitcoin-governance-bip-causes-twitter-controversy-newsbtc\/"},"modified":"2017-05-14T17:26:49","modified_gmt":"2017-05-14T21:26:49","slug":"new-bitcoin-governance-bip-causes-twitter-controversy-newsbtc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/bitcoin-2\/new-bitcoin-governance-bip-causes-twitter-controversy-newsbtc\/","title":{"rendered":"New Bitcoin Governance BIP Causes Twitter Controversy &#8211; newsBTC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    It appears this BIP in question \"clones\" the governance    layer found in the Decred altcoin.  <\/p>\n<p>    It looks like we have another social media tussle on our    hands right now. Bitcoin developer Luke Dashjr has introduced a    new BIP. That is nothing unusual, as there are many    improvements to be made where Bitcoin is concerned. However,    this particular proposal seemingly uses the governance layer    found in the Decred altcoin. An interesting way to go about    things, although it raises a lot of eyebrows.  <\/p>\n<p>    Many people seemingly agree useful altcoin features may    find their way to Bitcoin at some point. This is part of the    reason why some people feel altcoins have a lot of merit.    Bitcoin can use quite a few improvements, that much is evident.    If an altcoin comes up with a new feature, it can be modified    to become a part of the Bitcoin protocol. However, a recent BIP    by Bitcoin developer Luke Dashjr has people up in arms right    now.  <\/p>\n<p>    It appears this BIP    in question clones the governance layer found in the    Decred altcoin. Interestingly enough, Luke Dashjr feels any    correlation with the Decred source code is a mere coincidence.    In fact, he claims several developers have been looking at    introducing a similar BIP over the past few years. One could    also argue how every alternative cryptocurrency in existence    right now copies Bitcoin, although that is a different    conversation altogether.  <\/p>\n<p>    Introducing a governance layer in Bitcoin would be quite    a significant feat, though. Doing so would require a soft fork of the    code, assuming it will ever become a part of Bitcoin. The BIP    focuses on a new opcode for the Bitcoin scripting system. As a    result, transactions can be constructed which are valid only    within blocks signaling for or against arbitrary network    upgrades. It is an interesting BIP to keep an eye on, that much    is certain.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some users on Twitter are pointing out the irony of this    BIP, though. An earlier    tweet by Luke Dashjr mentions how governance    is nothing but a threat to Bitcoin. Any attempts to govern    Bitcoin are an issue, in his opinion. It is important to note    said statement is part of a block size debate taking place on    Twitter earlier this year. Rest assured it is not the last we    will have heard regarding this BIP and governance in    Bitcoin.  <\/p>\n<p>    Header image courtesy of Shutterstock  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.newsbtc.com\/2017\/05\/14\/new-bitcoin-governance-bip-causes-twitter-controversy\/\" title=\"New Bitcoin Governance BIP Causes Twitter Controversy - newsBTC\">New Bitcoin Governance BIP Causes Twitter Controversy - newsBTC<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> It appears this BIP in question \"clones\" the governance layer found in the Decred altcoin. It looks like we have another social media tussle on our hands right now. Bitcoin developer Luke Dashjr has introduced a new BIP <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/bitcoin-2\/new-bitcoin-governance-bip-causes-twitter-controversy-newsbtc\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94873],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-192942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bitcoin-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192942"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=192942"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192942\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=192942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=192942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=192942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}