{"id":192781,"date":"2017-05-13T05:55:06","date_gmt":"2017-05-13T09:55:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/political-correctness-or-torah-truth-the-jewish-press-jewishpress-com\/"},"modified":"2017-05-13T05:55:06","modified_gmt":"2017-05-13T09:55:06","slug":"political-correctness-or-torah-truth-the-jewish-press-jewishpress-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/political-correctness\/political-correctness-or-torah-truth-the-jewish-press-jewishpress-com\/","title":{"rendered":"Political Correctness Or Torah Truth? &#8211; The Jewish Press &#8211; JewishPress.com"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Photo Credit: Rabbi Eliyahu Safran    <\/p>\n<p>    If one weighs with weights that are deficient by the    standards agreed upon in his locality, or measures with a    measuring vessel deficient by the agreed standards, he violates    a negative commandment, for Scripture states (Vayikra    19:35), You shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in    length, in weight, or in measure.  Maimonides,    Mishneh Torah  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Political correctness does not have an exemplary history. In    the middle of the past century, it was, according to Wikipedia,    associated with the dogmatic application of Stalinist    doctrine Hardly a ringing endorsement. Its use now, as part    of our toxic political discourse, is as a club with which to    hammer the opposition.  <\/p>\n<p>    Although used mostly against liberals, the truth is that    political correctness is difficult to define, as it almost    always resides in the eyes of the user.  <\/p>\n<p>    To more conservative commentators, political correctness    covers nearly every perceived weakness of a more liberal    worldview. To those same liberals, the use of the term by    conservatives is code to paper over fairness and decency.    After all, discourse we now consider wrong  racist and    anti-Semitic terminology, for exanple  was once normal and    acceptable, until someone identified it as politically    incorrect even though it was not called that then.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our tradition is very clear as to the respect and decency that    is to be afforded all people.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our concern, however, is that the desire to be politically    correct has gone overboard; that we no longer simply defend    who a person is but find ourselves pressured to defend    whatever anyone might think or claim for themselves.    As a result, we may also be called upon to implicitly or    explicitly defend behaviors the Torah deems wrong.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is not consistent with our tradition.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our tradition teaches that every human being, created in the    image of God, deserves compassion and sensitivity. But as our    code of behavior makes clear, not every form of behavior should    be granted that same consideration.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is certainly true when it comes to matters of sexuality.    God makes clear in the very first parshah of Torah    that He created man and he created woman and    He ordained the institution of marriage.  <\/p>\n<p>    In matters of Torah, the changing perspectives of society and    culture have no bearing on what is right and wrong.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sensitivity and compassion, yes.  <\/p>\n<p>    Approval, no.  <\/p>\n<p>    Hoseas final verse, which Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai used to    teach this lesson for all time, begins with the words mi    chacham  who is wise?  <\/p>\n<p>    The Malbim teaches, A person is capable of achieving    understanding in many areas through his own intelligence.    However, when dealing with matters beyond human comprehension,    he must first acquire the necessary wisdom and only then can he    deepen his understanding through his logical prowess  <\/p>\n<p>    His insight applies particularly to the knowledge of the ways    of Hashem, along with matters of Godliness. So who is wise? He    who has acquired the wisdom of Hashems ways, and can thereby    build upon that wisdom to achieve understanding. This teaching    makes clear that when it comes to matters of Godliness, the    very notion of political correctness is irrelevant.  <\/p>\n<p>    Political correctness has created an environment in which there    is fake news and fake facts. There are numerous examples of how    this has poisoned the political discourse and caused people to    be fearful of speaking out.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is madness when more than 75 percent of births in Detroit    are to unwed mothers, yet it is politically incorrect to    suggest that there is something wrong with this. It was    frightening when a high school in California recently sent five    students home from school for wearing shirts displaying the    American flag on Cinco de Mayo.  <\/p>\n<p>    And for Chris Matthews of MSNBC to suggest it was racist when    conservatives use the term Chicago borders on journalistic    malpractice. In such a damaged environment, it is easy to    reduce Godliness to just another talking point.  <\/p>\n<p>    But as history and tradition has taught us, Godliness is not so    easily diminished by the whim and foolishness of man.  <\/p>\n<p>    * * * * *  <\/p>\n<p>    Not long after a recent conversation about the perils of this    politically correct\/incorrect environment we live in, I    returned to my study of that particular days Daf Yomi, which    had, for the previous few days, devoted several Talmudic    dapim to the many halachic details concerning honest    weights and measures.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Torah declares the need for absolute accuracy of scales and    all their components so that there can be no doubt about honest    dealings in commerce between man and man. The Talmud elaborates    on the essential need for such accuracy and honesty. R Levi    suggests that the punishment for dishonest weights is even more    severe than for illicit relations; that stealing from humans is    worse than stealing from God [from Hekdesh].  <\/p>\n<p>    The Torah is clear: there can be no compromise in these    matters. Among the many details taught on the Daf (Bava    Batra 89) is the instruction not to use scales made of    wood, lead, or other metals (for they corrode or become sticky    with grease, which affects their accuracy). We learn that the    utensil used to flatten off the top of the materials being    weighed should not be too hard or too soft, along with other    detailed instructions  all to guarantee that no one will ever    be cheated.  <\/p>\n<p>    After elucidating these instructions, we hear uncertainty from    the greatest scholar of all, Rabban Yochanan be Zakai. Having    these teachings, should he actually teach them? Woe    unto me if I teach it to them and woe unto me if I dont teach    it to them.  <\/p>\n<p>    In other words, in teaching these things, he might very well    reveal the tricks of the trade  which dishonest people could    then use to cheat more effectively. But in not    teaching these things, dishonest people will believe the    talmidei chachamim, the rabbis and religious teachers,    are ignorant about thievery and dishonesty  that is, that they    know nothing about contemporary issues.  <\/p>\n<p>    So, the Talmud asks, What did R Yochanan ben Zakai actually    do? Rav Shmuel bar Yitzchak teaches that R Yochanan ben Zakai    did teach all of the passages detailing the various    methods of weights and measures. He did not hide Gods word    simply because the ramaim might glean untruths by    evaluating truthfulness.  <\/p>\n<p>    R Yochanan was not only the greatest of scholars but also a    successful businessman. He knew there were those who would use    any opportunity to cheat but he was not concerned about being    politically correct (after all, todays ramaim are    those who seek to be politically correct at the expense of    truth, honesty, and morality).  <\/p>\n<p>    R Yochanan spoke truth honestly and forcefully. Certainly it    was as difficult for him to do so in his time as it is for us    in ours. Why did he do it? Where did he find the courage? Rav    Shmuel bar Yitzchak suggests the answer. Because the last verse    in Hoseas impassioned declaration balances blunt judgment with    love and mercy. For the ways of Hashem are straight; the    righteous will walk with them and sinners will stumble over    them.From this, R Yochanan taught that Gods absolute    truth must be revealed without hesitation or fear.  <\/p>\n<p>    There is no political correctness in Torah. The righteous need    to know the truth if they are to do right. The righteous    want to know Gods will. As for the siners, they will    stumble over them. The sinners will always find new ways of    thievery. Their sinfulness should never be an excuse for    withholding Gods Torah.  <\/p>\n<p>    As Jews, our tradition and Gods teaching command that we speak    out. Marriage is between man and woman. Other forms of union    can be described in many ways  but not as marriage.    Ish is ish. Isha is isha.    Man is man. Woman is woman. No political movement can change    that. No governmental law or edict can compromise that.  <\/p>\n<p>    Terrorism is terrorism. A murderer is a murderer.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our tradition teaches compassion and sensitivity to the person,    not the act. Many factors and variables contribute to the    people we become. Children are abused. Families are    dysfunctional. There is alcohol and drug abuse. Terrible,    terrible things. But they do not excuse behavior that God    condemns.  <\/p>\n<p>    R Yochanans lesson is not just about weights and measures, it    is an eternal lesson to be applied to all situations  the    worlds righteous, even in silence, deserve and need to hear    truth while the cheaters and charlatans will inevitably    stumble, truth or no truth.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those who seek only political correctness are uninterested in    Gods truth.  <\/p>\n<p>    R Eliezer of Beaugency says of Hoseas statement, The wayward    see the ways of Hashem as being the source of their downfall,    for their sole interest in life is fulfilling their whims and    desires, and the ways of the Torah stand in their way.  <\/p>\n<p>    Rdak elaborates, The stumblers say there is no mesader    umanhig haolam [Godly law and order] and there is no    absolute yosher so they follow their hearts whims and    desires. They will fail and will be lost.  <\/p>\n<p>    R Yochanan be Zakai taught truth to power and, in doing so,    saved the Jewish nation in the midst of destruction and    hopelessness.  <\/p>\n<p>    To teach or not to teach? The answer is clear.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the rest here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jewishpress.com\/indepth\/opinions\/political-correctness-or-torah-truth\/2017\/05\/12\/\" title=\"Political Correctness Or Torah Truth? - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com\">Political Correctness Or Torah Truth? - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Photo Credit: Rabbi Eliyahu Safran If one weighs with weights that are deficient by the standards agreed upon in his locality, or measures with a measuring vessel deficient by the agreed standards, he violates a negative commandment, for Scripture states (Vayikra 19:35), You shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in length, in weight, or in measure. Maimonides, Mishneh Torah Political correctness does not have an exemplary history. In the middle of the past century, it was, according to Wikipedia, associated with the dogmatic application of Stalinist doctrine Hardly a ringing endorsement <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/political-correctness\/political-correctness-or-torah-truth-the-jewish-press-jewishpress-com\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187751],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-192781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-political-correctness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192781"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=192781"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192781\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=192781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=192781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=192781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}