{"id":192593,"date":"2017-05-11T13:25:42","date_gmt":"2017-05-11T17:25:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/you-really-should-know-what-the-andrew-file-system-is-network-world\/"},"modified":"2017-05-11T13:25:42","modified_gmt":"2017-05-11T17:25:42","slug":"you-really-should-know-what-the-andrew-file-system-is-network-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/cloud-computing\/you-really-should-know-what-the-andrew-file-system-is-network-world\/","title":{"rendered":"You really should know what the Andrew File System is &#8211; Network World"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>        By Bob Brown, News Editor,        Network World | May 10,        2017 2:20 PM PT      <\/p>\n<p>      Your Alpha Doggs editor is Bob Brown, Network World Online      Executive Editor, News.    <\/p>\n<p>    When I saw that the creators of    the Andrew File System (AFS) had been named recipients of the    $35K ACM Software System Award, I said to myself \"That's    cool, I remember AFS from the days of companies like Sun    Microsystems... just please don't ask me to explain what the    heck it is.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Don't ask my colleagues either. A quick    walking-around-the-office survey of a half dozen of them turned    up mostly blank stares at the mention of the Andrew File    System, a technology developed in the early 1980s and named    after Andrew Carnegie and Andrew Mellon. But as the Association    for Computing Machinery's award would indicate, AFS is indeed    worth knowing about as a foundational technology that paved the    way for widely used cloud computing techniques and    applications.  <\/p>\n<p>    MORE:     Whirlwind tour of tech's major awards, honors and prizes  <\/p>\n<p>    Mahadev \"Satya\"    Satyanarayanan, a Carnegie Mellon University Computer Science    professor who was part of the AFS team, answered a handful    of my questions via email about the origins of this scalable    and secure distributed file system, the significance of it, and    where it stands today. Satyanarayanan was recognized by ACM    along with John Howard, Michael Leon Kazar, Robert Nasmyth    Sidebotham, David Nichols, Sherri Nichols, Alfred    Spectorand Michael West, who worked as a team via the    Information Technology Center partnership between Carnegie    Mellon and IBM (the latter of which incidentally funded this    ACM prize).  <\/p>\n<p>    Is there any way to quantify how widespread AFS use    became and which sorts of organizations used it most? Any sense    of how much it continues to be used, and for what?  <\/p>\n<p>    Over a roughly 25-year timeframe, AFS has been used by many    U.S. and non-U.S. universities. Many national labs,    supercomputing centers and similar institutions have also used    AFS. Companies in the financial industry (e.g.,    Goldman Sachs) and other industries have also used AFS. A    useful snapshot of AFS deployment was provided by the paper    \"An    Empirical Study of a Wide-Area Distributed File System\"    that appeared in ACM Transactions on Computer    Systemsin 1996. That paper states:  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Originally intended as a solution to the computing needs of    the Carnegie Mellon University, AFS has expanded to unite about    1000 servers and 20,000 clients in 10 countries. We estimate    that more than 100,000 users use this system worldwide.    In geographic span as well as in number of users and machines,    AFS is the largest distributed file system that has ever been    built and put to serious use.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Figure 1 in that paper shows that AFS spanned 59 educational    cells, 22 commercial cells, 11 governmental cells, and 39 cells    outside the United States at the time of the    snapshot. In addition to this large federated    multi-organization deployment of AFS, there were many    non-federated deployments of AFS within individual    organizations.  <\/p>\n<p>    What has been AFS's biggest impact on today's cloud and    enterprise computing environments?  <\/p>\n<p>    The model of storing data in the cloud and delivering parts of    it via on-demand caching at the edge is something everyone    takes for granted today. That model was first conceived    and demonstrated by AFS, and is perhaps its biggest    impact. It simplifies management complexity for    operational staff, while preserving performance and scalability    for end users. From the viewpoint of end users, the    ability to walk up to any machine and use it as your own    provides enormous flexibility and convenience. All the    data that is specific to a user is delivered on demand over the    network. Keeping in sync all the machines that you use    becomes trivial. Users at organizations that    deployed AFS found this an addictive capability. Indeed,    it was this ability that     inspired the founders of DropBox to start their    company. They had used AFS at MIT as part of the    Athena environment, and wanted to enable at wider scale this    effortless ability to keep in sync all the machines used by a    person. Finally, many of the architectural    principles and implementation techniques of AFS have influenced    many other systems over the past decades.  <\/p>\n<p>    How did AFS come to be created in the first    place?  <\/p>\n<p>    In 1982, CMU and IBM signed a collaborative agreement to create    a \"distributed personal computing environment\" on the CMU    campus, that could later be commercialized by IBM.    The actual collaboration began in January 1983. A    good reference for information about these early days is    the1986    CACM paper by [James H.] Morris et al entitled \"Andrew: A    Distributed Personal Computing Environment\". The    context of the agreement was as follows. In 1982, IBM had    just introduced the IBM PC, which was proving to be very    successful. At the same time, IBM was fully aware that    enterprise-scale use of personal computing required the    technical ability to share information easily, securely, and    with appropriate access controls. This was possible in    the timesharing systems that were still dominant in the early    1980s. How to achieve this in the dispersed and    fragmented world of a PC-based enterprise was not clear in    1982. A big part of the IBM-CMU collaborative agreement    was to develop a solution to this problem. More than half    of the first year of the Information Technology Center (1983)    was spent in brainstorming on how best to achieve this    goal. Through this brainstorming process, a distributed    file system emerged by about August 1983 as the best mechanism    for enterprise-scale information sharing. How to    implement such a distributed file system then became the focus    of our efforts.  <\/p>\n<p>    What would the AFS creators have done differently in    building AFS if they had to do it over again?  <\/p>\n<p>    I can think of at least two things: one small and one big.  <\/p>\n<p>    The small thing is that the design and early evolution of AFS    happened prior to the emergence of [network address translation    (NAT)]-based firewalls in networking. These are in    widespread use today in homes, small enterprises, etc.    Their presence makes it difficult for a server to initiate    contact with a client in order to establish a callback    channel. If we had developed AFS after the widespread use    of NAT-based firewalls, we would have carefully rethought how    best to implement callbacks in the presence of NAT    firewalls.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bigger thing has to do with the World Wide Web. The    Mosaic browser emerged in the early 1990s, and Netscape    Navigator a bit later. By then AFS had been in existence    for many years, and was in widespread use at many places. Had    we realized how valuable the browser would eventually become as    a tool, we would have paid much more attention to it. For    example, a browser can be used in AFS by using \"file:\/\/\" rather    than \"http:\/\/\" in addresses. All of the powerful caching    and consistence-maintenance machinery that is built into AFS    would then have been accessible through a user-friendly tool    that has eventually proved to be enormously valuable. It    is possible that the browser and AFS could have had a much more    symbiotic evolution, as HTTP and browsers eventually did.  <\/p>\n<p>    Looks like maybe there are remnants of AFS alive in    the open source world?  <\/p>\n<p>    Indeed. OpenAFS    continues to be an active open source project. Many    institutions (including CMU) continue to use AFS for production    use, and this code is now based on OpenAFS.  <\/p>\n<p>    Also, my work on the Coda File System forked off from the    November 1986 version of AFS. Coda was    open-sourced in the mid-1990s. That code base    continues to be alive and functional today. Buried in    Coda are ideas and actual code from early AFS.  <\/p>\n<p>    Do any of you have any spectacular plans for what    theyll do with the prize money?  <\/p>\n<p>    Nothing concrete yet. We have discussed possibly donating    the funds to a charitable cause.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to see the original:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.networkworld.com\/article\/3195838\/cloud-computing\/you-really-should-know-what-the-andrew-file-system-is.html\" title=\"You really should know what the Andrew File System is - Network World\">You really should know what the Andrew File System is - Network World<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By Bob Brown, News Editor, Network World | May 10, 2017 2:20 PM PT Your Alpha Doggs editor is Bob Brown, Network World Online Executive Editor, News.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/cloud-computing\/you-really-should-know-what-the-andrew-file-system-is-network-world\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[257743],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-192593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cloud-computing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192593"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=192593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192593\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=192593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=192593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=192593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}