9 May 2017, 8 p.m.<\/p>\n
The system of higher education in Australia is anything but efficient. <\/p>\n
LASTweek the pre-budget announcements were coming in thick and fast, to soften us up for todays bad news, and saw Messrs Turnbull & Co clear the decks of two thorny education issues, school and university funding. <\/p>\n
Both were exercises in spin designed to fool the gullible, with the prize going to schools funding, though the propaganda that universities could afford the proposed cuts made it a close second. <\/p>\n
The government will cut university funding by 2.5 per cent, a decision they have based on the findings of a Deloitte report, which showed that between 2010-15 the cost of course delivery increased by 9.5 per cent, while revenue grew by 15 per cent.<\/p>\n
So many, but by no means all, universities are running healthy surpluses and, according to Simon Birmingham, Minister for Education, they can take a haircut.<\/p>\n
This has been called an \"efficiency dividend\" but the system of higher education in Australia is anything but efficient. <\/p>\n
Even thougheconomic rationalism suggests that competition generates efficiency what passes for efficiency usually compromises the quality of education.<\/p>\n
It can mean giving students fewer curriculum choices, increasing class sizes, reducing face-to-face hours, teaching them with casual staff and substituting classroom teaching with \"digital delivery\".<\/p>\n
All of these have happened and continue to do so at our own local Charles Sturt University.<\/p>\n
If staff and undergraduates are being short-changed, where is the money going?<\/p>\n
Im indebted to George Morgan, Associate Professor at the School of Humanities and Communication Arts and the Institute for Culture and Societyat Western Sydney University for suggesting three main avenues.<\/p>\n
In the first instance many universities cross subsidise research with the public money they receive for undergraduate teaching largely because the federal government underfunds research. <\/p>\n
Secondly, some universities have undertaken ambitious capital works programs, erecting what are in effect \"signature\" buildings such as Frank Gehry designed building at UTS, no doubt to communicate the new university's cultural and intellectual importance. <\/p>\n
Thirdly, administrative costs continue to grow inexorably. Most universities employ more administrators than academics <\/p>\n
Given all this, what the university system requires is political and economic change, not short term and crude fiscal shocks.<\/p>\n
The university community (including both students and staff) needs to be given more power over institutional affairs to provide more democratic checks and balances over the excesses, caprice and follies of managerialism.<\/p>\n
As to Turnbulls declaration last week that he will \"bring the school funding wars to an end\" in a stunning turnaround that will see the government pump an extra $19 billion into schools over the next decade, Im tempted to agree with Greens Education spokesperson Sarah Hanson-Young.<\/p>\n
\"We'll look at the detail of this announcement, but what we know is that Australia's school funding system is broken. It's time our children's education was prioritised in Australia. It's a sad reality that many of our kids are being left behind, Hanson-Young said<\/p>\n
This will certainly be the case as the governments proposal means that less than half of additional federal funding over the next 10 years will go to public schools, compared to 80 per cent under the Gonski agreements. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Here is the original post:<\/p>\n
Ray Goodlass' Ray's Reasoning | OPINION, May 9, 2017 - Daily Advertiser<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 9 May 2017, 8 p.m. The system of higher education in Australia is anything but efficient. Continue reading