Not surprisingly, last weeks multiple posts about the racists who attend games at Bostons Fenway Park brought out the commenters who view these sorts of things as assaults on free speech. <\/p>\n
Theyre probably racist too, a study released last week from the University of Kansas says. <\/p>\n
When people make appeals to democratic principles like freedom of speech they dont always represent a genuine interest in that principle, Mark H. White, a graduate student in psychology, and co-author of the study said in a news release. We think of principles as ideas we use to guide behavior in our everyday lives. Our data show something different that we tend to make up our mind on something based on our attitudes in this case, racial attitudes and then decide that the principle is relevant or irrelevant. People do whatever best fits their pre-existing attitudes. <\/p>\n
In other words, if youre racist, you do what you can to justify your racism without acknowledging your racism. <\/p>\n
We look at people who defend anothers racist speech for example, defending someone who got fired for going into a racist rant at work with a free speech argument, said co-author Christian Crandall, professor of psychology at KU. What do we know about people making this argument? The correlation between using the free speech defense and peoples own racial prejudice is pretty high. Its racists defending racists. <\/p>\n
You might think that, Maybe people who defend this racist speech are just big fans of free speech, that theyre principled supporters of freedom, Crandall said. Well, no. We give them a news article with the same speech aimed at police and prejudice scores are completely uncorrelated with defending speech aimed at police and also uncorrelated with snarky speech aimed at customers at a coffee shop, but with no racial content. <\/p>\n
In their experiments, the pair tested several scenarios with their subjects and found that how they felt about the principle of free speech depended less on an embrace of the Constitution, and more about how they felt about the subject of the speech. <\/p>\n
It isnt so much that these controversies make prejudiced people feel bad about themselves; instead, it seems to be driven partially by prejudiced people feeling like they are not free to live how they want to live and say what they want to say they feel as if their freedom is under attack, he said. <\/p>\n
The freedom to be a racist, for example. <\/p>\n
Bob Collins has been with Minnesota Public Radio since 1992, emigrating to Minnesota from Massachusetts. He was senior editor of news in the 90s, ran MPRs political unit, created the MPR News regional website, invented the popular Select A Candidate, started the two most popular blogs in the history of MPR and every day laments that his Minnesota Fantasy Legislature project never caught on. <\/p>\n
NewsCut is a blog featuring observations about the news. It provides a forum for an online discussion and debate about events that might not typically make the front page. NewsCut posts are not news stories but reflections , observations, and debate. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read the original here: Not surprisingly, last weeks multiple posts about the racists who attend games at Bostons Fenway Park brought out the commenters who view these sorts of things as assaults on free speech. Theyre probably racist too, a study released last week from the University of Kansas says. When people make appeals to democratic principles like freedom of speech they dont always represent a genuine interest in that principle, Mark H Continue reading
\nWhen 'free speech' is a cover for racism | NewsCut | Minnesota ... - Minnesota Public Radio News (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"