{"id":191889,"date":"2017-05-09T15:09:56","date_gmt":"2017-05-09T19:09:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nsa-stops-one-abuse-but-many-remain-los-angeles-daily-news-la-daily-news\/"},"modified":"2017-05-09T15:09:56","modified_gmt":"2017-05-09T19:09:56","slug":"nsa-stops-one-abuse-but-many-remain-los-angeles-daily-news-la-daily-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nsa-2\/nsa-stops-one-abuse-but-many-remain-los-angeles-daily-news-la-daily-news\/","title":{"rendered":"NSA stops one abuse, but many remain &#8211; Los Angeles Daily News &#8211; LA Daily News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The National Security Agency has decided to halt a    controversial surveillance program, but this was just the tip    of an iceberg of government abuses of privacy and due process.  <\/p>\n<p>    The NSA said last week that it will no longer engage in    warrantless spying on Americans digital communications that    merely mention a foreign intelligence target, referred to in    the intelligence community as about communications. The    agency had claimed the authority to engage in such surveillance    under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,    which allows it to target non-U.S. citizens or residents    believed to be outside the country, although Americans    communications are oftentimes swept up as well.  <\/p>\n<p>    NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications    that merely mention a foreign intelligence target, the agency    announced in a statement. Instead, NSA will limit such    collection to internet communications that are sent directly to    or from a foreign target.  <\/p>\n<p>    Even though NSA does not have the ability at this time to stop    collecting about information without losing some other    important data, the Agency will stop the practice to reduce the    chance that it would acquire communications of U.S. persons or    others who are not in direct contact with a foreign    intelligence target, it continued.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is a significant departure from previous assurances that the    program was vital to national security, though many have    forcefully disputed that claim. Its effectiveness has always    been difficult to gauge, however, due to the lack of    information the NSA has provided about it.  <\/p>\n<p>    The agencys decision is certainly welcome, though we must make    the perhaps generous assumption that it will do  or not do, in    this case  what it says it will, and that it will not simply    change its mind in the future. Our enthusiasm is also tempered    by the realization that this is an agency, along with various    other government intelligence agencies, that is built on    deception and has repeatedly lied about its spying activities    and violations of Americans constitutional rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    We are reminded of the public testimony of then-National    Intelligence Director James Clapper at a March 2013 Senate    Intelligence Committee hearing. At one point, Sen. Ron Wyden,    D-Ore., asked Clapper plainly, Does the NSA collect any type    of data at all on millions, or hundreds of millions of    Americans? Clapper then lied to his face, and the faces of all    Americans, saying, No, sir, and then, Not wittingly.  <\/p>\n<p>    Within a matter of months, news stories based on information    from the Edward Snowden leaks would reveal the NSAs bulk    collection of Americans phone metadata and internet    communications.  <\/p>\n<p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>    Then there is the matter of the backdoor search loophole, by    which the FBI or other agencies may search NSA databases for    information about Americans collected under Section 702 without    having to go through all that pesky business of obtaining a    warrant. The loophole is sure to be a bone of contention during    congressional debate over the reauthorization of Section 702,    which is scheduled to expire at the end of the year.  <\/p>\n<p>    Given the governments repeated abuses of Americans privacy    through its snooping activities, those looking to reauthorize    Section 702 have some serious questions to answer about how    many Americans have been swept up in this supposed foreign    surveillance, and how useful this intelligence actually is.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Fourth Amendment is quite clear: Government searches    require a warrant issued by a judge based on probable cause and    describing the specific place to be searched, and the persons    or things to be seized. New technology may make our    communications quicker and more convenient  as well as more    easily recorded and stored  but it does not alter that    fundamental principle.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dailynews.com\/opinion\/20170506\/nsa-stops-one-abuse-but-many-remain\" title=\"NSA stops one abuse, but many remain - Los Angeles Daily News - LA Daily News\">NSA stops one abuse, but many remain - Los Angeles Daily News - LA Daily News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The National Security Agency has decided to halt a controversial surveillance program, but this was just the tip of an iceberg of government abuses of privacy and due process. The NSA said last week that it will no longer engage in warrantless spying on Americans digital communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target, referred to in the intelligence community as about communications <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nsa-2\/nsa-stops-one-abuse-but-many-remain-los-angeles-daily-news-la-daily-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94881],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nsa-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191889"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191889\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}