{"id":191512,"date":"2017-05-06T03:58:49","date_gmt":"2017-05-06T07:58:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/some-optimism-ahead-of-fiscal-2018-spending-talks-ee-news\/"},"modified":"2017-05-06T03:58:49","modified_gmt":"2017-05-06T07:58:49","slug":"some-optimism-ahead-of-fiscal-2018-spending-talks-ee-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/some-optimism-ahead-of-fiscal-2018-spending-talks-ee-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Some optimism ahead of fiscal 2018 spending talks &#8211; E&#038;E News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>    Geof Koss and George Cahlink, E&E News    reporters  <\/p>\n<p>    Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney said    this week, \"Let's put '17 to an end. The discussion about '18    funding begins right now.\" Photo courtesy    of C-SPAN.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lawmakers said this week that the rejection of deep cuts sought    by the Trump administration to federal energy and environmental    agencies in this week's spending compromise could set the tone    for less partisan fiscal 2018 spending deliberations.  <\/p>\n<p>    The administration \"highlighted what they felt were priorities;    we took a look at them, and we made the determinations as we    saw fit,\" said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who chairs the    Appropriations subcommittee that funds U.S. EPA and the    Interior Department. \"And I think you will see 2018 approps    kind of move forward in the same manner.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    New Mexico Sen. Tom Udall, Murkowski's Democratic counterpart    atop the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies    Appropriations Subcommittee, offered a similar assessment. \"I    think we now have a good baseline,\" he said yesterday.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"All the things the administration was advocating for, they    don't look like they're really flying in this Congress,\" said    Udall. \"And I would say that's a bipartisan statement against    those kinds of cuts.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    President Trump is due to sign into law a $1.017 trillion    fiscal 2017 omnibus spending bill that rejects his call for    steep cuts to EPA, Department of Energy renewable energy    research and various agencies' climate science programs.  <\/p>\n<p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>    But despite talk of bipartisanship now and for the future,    Udall said fiscal 2018 appropriations will be a \"tougher lift\"    because of a late start.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We're way behind,\" he said. \"Normally, we'd be holding    appropriations hearings in May and June, and we're only going    to start, I think, in June for the very early ones.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Udall said he anticipates that Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke    and EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt will appear before the panel    after the White House releases its full budget request later    this month.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware, top Democrat on the Environment    and Public Works Committee, yesterday credited \"all these    marches\" showing public support for EPA and other agencies.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"A lot of voices were heard, and I think those were reflected    in the legislation,\" he told reporters yesterday.  <\/p>\n<p>    Looking to the next round of spending talks, Carper added:    \"We're not going to take anything for granted.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We're just going to continue the drumbeat and make sure    members understand the consequences of the deep cuts proposed    by President Trump,\" he said. \"They were not thoughtful, and as    it turns out, they were not supported by Democrats or    Republicans, for the most part.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Democrats cheered fighting to keep out many policy riders from    the omnibus. And while there were signs that the bill would    include funding to restart the licensing process for the    nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nev., those dollars    were left out.  <\/p>\n<p>    But a senior House Energy and Commerce Republican is confident    the money will be included in the next spending bill. \"It's    basically really a 2018 issue,\" said Rep. John Shimkus    (R-Ill.), chairman of the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on    Energy. \"I'm not concerned.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    There are signs that at least some partisan fights are likely    to play out in upcoming spending bill talks. Citing concerns    over the size of the package, conservatives lined up against    the omnibus this week.  <\/p>\n<p>    Nearly all 30 or so members of the hard-right House Freedom    Caucus voted against it, as did more half the much larger House    Republican Study Committee.  <\/p>\n<p>    Almost all the 18 votes in the Senate against the deal came    from conservatives, among them Sens. Mike Lee of Utah, Steve    Daines of Montana and Jeff Flake of Arizona.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the House's conservative opponents, Rep. Morgan Griffith    (R-Va.), is already looking at options to cut spending in the    fiscal 2018 bills using a decades-old provision he helped    revive for this Congress.  <\/p>\n<p>    The provision, known as the Holman Rule, would permit House    floor amendments to target federal programs and agencies by    cutting employees or eliminating their pay. The practice had    been banned since the Reagan administration.  <\/p>\n<p>    Griffith said he already has told EPA Administrator Pruitt he    hopes to use the rule to shift some jobs at the agency. The    lawmaker stressed that he is not pursuing \"the whole    destruction\" of EPA but wants to make it more efficient and    responsive.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We need to get some of the people out of the alabaster towers    in D.C. and move them into the field in places like Flint,    Mich., where they can help people solve problems, not just    punish them,\" said Griffith, an Energy and Commerce member who    has been a critic of EPA regulations.  <\/p>\n<p>    Meanwhile, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)    sounded a partisan tone by telling reporters yesterday that the    main lesson learned from the omnibus negotiations is that    Republicans need Democrats to pass spending bills.  <\/p>\n<p>    She said the GOP had only 141 votes in favor of the omnibus    bill, requiring it to have Democrats provide the rest needed to    get to a 218 majority. Without Democratic support, Pelosi said,    government would have faced a shutdown.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"There's a recognition of a strong number of Republicans who    have a very easy comfort level in shutting government down. So    that just empowers us,\" she added.  <\/p>\n<p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>    Advertisement  <\/p>\n<p>      The essential news for energy & environment professionals    <\/p>\n<p>       1996-2017 Environment & Energy Publishing,      LLCPrivacy      PolicySite      Map    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Follow this link: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.eenews.net\/stories\/1060054096\" title=\"Some optimism ahead of fiscal 2018 spending talks - E&E News\">Some optimism ahead of fiscal 2018 spending talks - E&E News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Advertisement Geof Koss and George Cahlink, E&#038;E News reporters Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney said this week, \"Let's put '17 to an end. The discussion about '18 funding begins right now.\" Photo courtesy of C-SPAN.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fiscal-freedom\/some-optimism-ahead-of-fiscal-2018-spending-talks-ee-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187823],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191512","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fiscal-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191512"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191512"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191512\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}