{"id":191360,"date":"2017-05-06T03:25:15","date_gmt":"2017-05-06T07:25:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/what-if-college-students-have-the-same-views-on-free-speech-as-everyone-else-new-york-magazine\/"},"modified":"2017-05-06T03:25:15","modified_gmt":"2017-05-06T07:25:15","slug":"what-if-college-students-have-the-same-views-on-free-speech-as-everyone-else-new-york-magazine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/what-if-college-students-have-the-same-views-on-free-speech-as-everyone-else-new-york-magazine\/","title":{"rendered":"What If College Students Have the Same Views on Free Speech As Everyone Else? &#8211; New York Magazine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Ad will collapse in seconds        CLOSE              \/ campus culture wars May 5, 2017 05\/05\/2017 3:23 pm By Jesse Singal      Share        Photo: Anadolu Agency\/Getty Images    <\/p>\n<p>      College students, you may have heard, are increasingly      opposed to free speech. Especially liberal ones  they just      cant handle views they disagree with, especially      conservative ones. Except: It might be more complicated than      that. Thats the takeaway of a new survey of Yale University      students  who made national headlines for an uproar over a      Halloween-costume email back in 2015  summed up by James Freeman in The      Wall Street Journal.    <\/p>\n<p>      The survey was commissioned by the William F. Buckley Jr.      Program at Yale, and there were 872 respondents. Freeman, who      is on the board of that organization, notes that 72 percent      of respondents were opposed to the idea of Yale having      speech codes to regulate speech for students and faculty.      And when presented with an either-or question about      controversial views, 84% opted for intellectual diversity      and just 5% favored muzzling people with controversial      views.    <\/p>\n<p>      Freeman cites this as both good news, from his point of view,      and as a novel finding: The first sentence of his column is      At last, theres hopeful news on intellectual liberty from a      college campus. But this isnt entirely new, even for Yale.      Last year, in the course of debunking some claims      about how ostensibly anti-free-speech college students are, I      highlighted a previous iteration of that same survey of Yale students      which found that they generally reported being staunchly      supportive of free-speech rights, at least when the question      was asked in certain ways (the slide deck I reference doesnt      appear to be available online anymore, unfortunately):    <\/p>\n<p>      Now, surveys are complicated and susceptible to rather wild      swings based on question wording, so it would be wrong to      cherry-pick any limited set of findings and then make      sweeping generalizations about college students these days.      Plus, there were some items on the survey where students      werent quite so free-speech-friendly. And it goes without      saying that what happens at Yale might not be applicable to      the rest of the college population.    <\/p>\n<p>      But whats striking is, zooming out a little, just how little      empirical evidence there is to suggest college students      differ in big ways from the broader population when it comes      to their support for free speech, despite how often we hear      confident assertions that campuses are free-speech no-go      zones. People clearly think there is a big      difference and will sometimes point to survey evidence to      support this view, the best recent-ish example being a      Pew survey from a year and a half ago      finding that 40 percent of students favored government bans      on certain forms of offensive speech. I initially covered      that finding as though it were alarming, but when I looked      around at other past surveys of Americans views on free      speech, it was clear that the 40 percent number wasnt an      outlier. In other words, as I wrote in a subsequent mea culpa:    <\/p>\n<p>      Part of whats going on here could come down to preference      intensity and opportunity. By which I mean that college      students who are in favor of expanding restrictions on free      speech might feel relatively more strongly about it than do      their pro-free-speech peers, and they have highly visible      opportunities to express those views by attempting to      no-platform speakers they dont like, or responding      assertively to instances of perceived administrator      insensitivity. Whenever they do so, of course  or whenever      they engage in any other act that can be portrayed as yet      another instance of out-of-control college activists  it      gets blown up to the status of a national news story. Twenty      years ago, no one would have heard of a small group of      Oberlin students protesting about the cultural appropriation      of Banh Mi going on at a dining hall there, or about any      of the dozen other similar blowups that seem to occur on a      monthly basis.    <\/p>\n<p>      Furthermore, its very hard for stories that buck the trend       stories about how most college students arent sent      into conniptions by appropriated Banh Mi  to get much      traction because of the whole dog-bites-man thing: No one      wants to write about college students who are acting like      everyday American adults with fairly standard views on free      speech. So while the phrase silent majority has some      unfortunate political baggage affixed to it, it might      accurately capture whats going on here. There may not have      been much real, substantive movement in the anti-free-speech      direction on campus  a lot of kids dont see the need to ban      or no-platform offensive speakers, but they arent in the      streets about it, and may simply not want to bother stating      their own views during those instances in which things get      out of hand. Because theyre quiet, they dont get much      coverage, skewing everyones view of college students as a      group.    <\/p>\n<p>    In Trumps America, Being    Sexually Assaulted Could Make Your Health Insurance More    Expensive  <\/p>\n<p>    Why Is Stan Lees Legacy in    Question?  <\/p>\n<p>    Museum Donors Are Pissed Celebs    Were Smoking in the Met Gala Bathrooms  <\/p>\n<p>    This Is What a Modern-Day Witch    Hunt Looks Like  <\/p>\n<p>    Trumpcare Destroys Any Notion    That American Conservatism Gives a Damn  <\/p>\n<p>    Republican Blurts Out That Sick    People Dont Deserve Affordable Care  <\/p>\n<p>    Star Wars Superfan Adam    Scott Quivers With Panic and Joy After Being Surprised by Mark    Hamill  <\/p>\n<p>    Exclusive! Sebastian Gorka    Leaves a Note for His McDonalds Server  <\/p>\n<p>    Whats New on Netflix: May    2017  <\/p>\n<p>    One Personality Trait Predicts    Domestic Nudity  <\/p>\n<p>        Most Popular Video On Daily Intelligencer      <\/p>\n<p>    In the new issue of its magazine, the terror group implores    would-be jihadists to take advantage of Americas lax gun laws.  <\/p>\n<p>    In rough justice for GOP candidate and voting-rights pariah    Karen Handel, a judge has extended registration for her runoff    contest with Jon Ossoff.  <\/p>\n<p>     Oh gosh  I dont think any individual has read the whole    bill.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Senate Intelligence Committee finally appears to be getting    to work.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2018 Democrats can take advantage of millennial antipathy    toward Donald Trump. But first they must address millennial    antipathy toward voting.  <\/p>\n<p>    Heres why House moderates voted for a more unpopular,    right-wing version of a bill that was too unpopular and    right-wing for them just weeks ago.  <\/p>\n<p>    White House: The president didnt mean he loves socialized    medicine. Trump: Yes, I really meant it.  <\/p>\n<p>     Who needs the truth?  <\/p>\n<p>    A new survey highlights the lack of good empirical evidence to    suggest that college students are the free-speech enemies many    suppose them to be.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thats Sebastian Gorka, Ph.D.  <\/p>\n<p>    While House passage of Trumpcare was essential for GOP plans,    Senate concerns and procedures will make the next stage of the    debate very different.  <\/p>\n<p>    The position is not political and firings are extremely rare.  <\/p>\n<p>    Murders are down about 13 percent compared to this time last    year.  <\/p>\n<p>    Whatever else it means, passage of Trumpcare spells trouble for    the House Republicans  especially Californians  in tough    districts who voted for it.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite the big bump in hiring, wages remained stagnant.  <\/p>\n<p>    The presidents Twitter engagement has been on a steady decline    since the inauguration.  <\/p>\n<p>    North Korea accuses America of a lot of things. But this    allegation is unusually detailed.  <\/p>\n<p>    A callous abandonment of the American people.  <\/p>\n<p>    Albany is considering a bill that would publish the state    returns of certain elected officials.  <\/p>\n<p>    He tells the public one story, while his staff tells the judge    another.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Visit link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/nymag.com\/daily\/intelligencer\/2017\/05\/college-students-free-speech.html\" title=\"What If College Students Have the Same Views on Free Speech As Everyone Else? - New York Magazine\">What If College Students Have the Same Views on Free Speech As Everyone Else? - New York Magazine<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Ad will collapse in seconds CLOSE \/ campus culture wars May 5, 2017 05\/05\/2017 3:23 pm By Jesse Singal Share Photo: Anadolu Agency\/Getty Images College students, you may have heard, are increasingly opposed to free speech. Especially liberal ones they just cant handle views they disagree with, especially conservative ones.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/what-if-college-students-have-the-same-views-on-free-speech-as-everyone-else-new-york-magazine\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191360","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191360"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191360\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}