{"id":19113,"date":"2013-11-01T18:42:20","date_gmt":"2013-11-01T22:42:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/genome-hacker-builds-family-trees-with-millions-of-branches\/"},"modified":"2013-11-01T18:42:20","modified_gmt":"2013-11-01T22:42:20","slug":"genome-hacker-builds-family-trees-with-millions-of-branches","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/genome-hacker-builds-family-trees-with-millions-of-branches\/","title":{"rendered":"&#39;Genome Hacker&#39; Builds Family Trees With Millions of Branches"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Megan Garber for The Atlantic 2013-11-01    16:02:00 UTC            <\/p>\n<p>    There may be a new record for the largest family tree ever assembled. It    dates back to the 15th century. It is comprised of 13 million    individuals. And it is only one part of an even larger    collection of genomic information: a collection compiled by the    computational biologist Yaniv Erlich and    stored not in albums or on walls, but in machines.  <\/p>\n<p>    Presented at the annual meeting American Society of Human    Genetics in Boston, and discussed in the journal Nature,    the mega-repository could offer a new way for researchers to    analyze the relationships between human genotypes and    phenotypes  between, essentially, nature and nurture.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the past, such expansively branched informational trees    would have been painstaking to cultivate. We have    documentation, sure, of family relationships and the traits    associated with them  church records, hospital logs, that kind    of thing  but gathering those documents for analysis took    time. Assembling genealogical data for even just a few thousand    individuals, Erlich noted during his ASHG presentation, could    take years.  <\/p>\n<p>    So here's where the hacking comes in: Erlich and his team,    rather than gathering those data themselves, went to a more    streamlined source: geni.com, which is a genealogy website with    43 million public profiles. Those profiles offered a wealth of    information, typically including not just individuals' birth    and death dates, but also the locations of their births and    deaths. Occasionally, they'd even contain photos uploaded by    the site's users.  <\/p>\n<p>    What resulted, in turn, was an extensive collection of    trait-and-gene information, ripe for analysis. And it was from    that collection that Erlich and his colleagues were able to    compile what Nature calls \"a single uber-pedigree\"    involving some 13 million individuals. \"We Are Family,\" as    performed by a huge swath of humanity. (But performed    anonymously: In making that and similar pedigrees available to other researchers, Erlich and his    team stripped names from the data to protect individuals'    privacy.)  <\/p>\n<p>    So what does a database like that  the family tree, digitized     get us? For one thing, it allows for a kind of longitudinal analysis of    given traits, helping researchers to gain insights into the    nature-versus-nurture aspects of those traits as they    played out over time.  <\/p>\n<p>    It can also offer insights into how traits are, ultimately,    controlled. Given a trait like fertility, say, are there a few    genes that exert broad influence ... or is fertility influenced    by many genes that have smaller effects? It might also help us    understand inherited diseases. (See, for example, the Iceland-based genetics firm deCODE, which is    taking advantage of the country's famously rich genealogical    data to help determine genetic signatures that can influence    diseases  and their treatment.)  <\/p>\n<p>    For all that, Nature notes, it's unclear how,    exactly, researchers will use the database for their own    purposes. (\"Some scientists at the meeting expressed enthusiasm    for the project,\" Heidi Ledford puts it, \"but were    hard-pressed to come up with a specific experiment using the    data.\")  <\/p>\n<p>    Put another way, though, the biggest uses for the results of    Erlich's genome-hacking may simply be to come. And those uses    would rely on developments that are cultural as much as    scientific; on medical records being stored and analyzed in    digital, and potentially public, forms. Imagine Erlich's    database being linked to individual medical information.    Imagine it being linked to DNA sequence data. As Nancy Cox, a    human geneticist at the University of Chicago, tells Ledford: \"Weve really only begun to    scratch the surface of what these kinds of pedigrees can tell    us.\"  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/mashable.com\/2013\/11\/01\/genome-hacker\/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&amp;utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=rss\" title=\"&#39;Genome Hacker&#39; Builds Family Trees With Millions of Branches\">&#39;Genome Hacker&#39; Builds Family Trees With Millions of Branches<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Megan Garber for The Atlantic 2013-11-01 16:02:00 UTC There may be a new record for the largest family tree ever assembled. It dates back to the 15th century. It is comprised of 13 million individuals <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/genome-hacker-builds-family-trees-with-millions-of-branches\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19113"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19113\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}