{"id":191087,"date":"2017-05-04T15:10:52","date_gmt":"2017-05-04T19:10:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/heroin-dealer-cites-religious-freedom-as-his-defense-court-says-yeah-but-what-about-the-buyers-washington-post\/"},"modified":"2017-05-04T15:10:52","modified_gmt":"2017-05-04T19:10:52","slug":"heroin-dealer-cites-religious-freedom-as-his-defense-court-says-yeah-but-what-about-the-buyers-washington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/heroin-dealer-cites-religious-freedom-as-his-defense-court-says-yeah-but-what-about-the-buyers-washington-post\/","title":{"rendered":"Heroin dealer cites religious freedom as his defense. Court says yeah, but what about the buyers? &#8211; Washington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Timothy Anderson admitted that he sold heroin, lots of it. And    that he didnt intend to stop. But he said he did so as a    student of Esoteric and Mysticism studies, and that he had    created a religious nonprofit group to distribute heroin to    the sick, lost, blind, lame, deaf and dead members of Gods    Kingdom. So prosecuting him criminally would be a violation of    the Religious    Freedom Restoration Act, passed in 1993 to prohibit the    government from unduly burdening a persons exercise of    religion.  <\/p>\n<p>    Anderson was on to something here. (Except for the part about    distributing to the dead. That may have been a bit off.) The    Supreme Court previously ruled under the religious freedom act    that a small sect of a Brazilian religion could import    ayahuasca, containing the hallucinogen dimethyltryptamine,    because a sect in New Mexico used it as part of a sacramental    tea. And the government has also given an exception to Native    Americans for peyote, even though both it and ayahuasca are    Schedule 1 drugs, considered the most dangerous in the    narcotics pyramid.  <\/p>\n<p>    [From    1993: Signing of Religious Freedom Act Culminates 3-Year    Push]  <\/p>\n<p>    Before his trial in St. Louis in 2015, Anderson demanded that    the case against him be thrown out, noting that the religious    freedom act states that the government may substantially    burden a persons exercise of religion only if it is in the    furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the    least restrictive means of furthering that compelling    interest. Anderson wrote that he was running a faith-based    system that offered detoxification treatment by the    distribution and controlled use of heroin to consenting adults    only as a method of bringing the individual to a drug-free    state. He stated that he did not formally ascribe to any    organized religion and that his religion beliefs derive from    his transcendental union with the divine, court records show.  <\/p>\n<p>    A federal judge in St. Louis did not hold a hearing on this    motion, records show. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel found    that the government has a proper and compelling interest in    the regulation of heroin, that prohibition of heroin was the    least restrictive means of achieving that interest, and    denied Andersons motion. A jury then convicted Anderson of    conspiracy and distribution and Sippel sentenced him to 27    years in prison.  <\/p>\n<p>    Anderson appealed. And the decision of the U.S. Court of    Appeals for the 8th Circuit,issued last week and first    reported by the Kansas City Star, acknowledged that a    reasonable observer may legitimately question how plausible it    is that Anderson exercised a sincerely held religious belief by    distributing heroin. But since there had not been any hearings    to explore the underpinnings of Andersons faith, and no one    wants to be attacking anyones religion, the 8th Circuit    assumed that the government substantially burdened his exercise    of religion. Was that legal?  <\/p>\n<p>    Well yes, the court ruled. Not just because it was heroin,    though. Circuit Judge Raymond Gruender wrote that there was no    claim that the recipients of the heroin used it for their own    religious purposes. That distinguished it from the groups who    have won accommodations for the sacramental use of peyote and    [ayahuasca], on one hand, and Andersons religious exercise    on the other, Gruender wrote. He also noted    thatAndersons religious exercise involves heroin    distribution, not just holy individual usage, and    that Anderson has indicated that he will not stop distributing    heroin under any circumstances, stating that he does not want    to compromise his faith in any way.  <\/p>\n<p>    And so, for now, there remains no exception in federal law for    the religious use of heroin. Anderson can still appeal to the    U.S. Supreme Court. Judging by his voluminous pro se filings in    St. Louis, that seems likely.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Original post: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/true-crime\/wp\/2017\/05\/04\/heroin-dealer-cites-religious-freedom-as-his-defense-court-says-yeah-but-what-about-the-buyers\/\" title=\"Heroin dealer cites religious freedom as his defense. Court says yeah, but what about the buyers? - Washington Post\">Heroin dealer cites religious freedom as his defense. Court says yeah, but what about the buyers? - Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Timothy Anderson admitted that he sold heroin, lots of it. And that he didnt intend to stop <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/heroin-dealer-cites-religious-freedom-as-his-defense-court-says-yeah-but-what-about-the-buyers-washington-post\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187727],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191087"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191087"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191087\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}