{"id":189675,"date":"2017-04-27T02:01:25","date_gmt":"2017-04-27T06:01:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/seagate-technology-plc-stx-q3-2017-results-earnings-call-transcript-seeking-alpha\/"},"modified":"2017-04-27T02:01:25","modified_gmt":"2017-04-27T06:01:25","slug":"seagate-technology-plc-stx-q3-2017-results-earnings-call-transcript-seeking-alpha","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/seagate-technology-plc-stx-q3-2017-results-earnings-call-transcript-seeking-alpha\/","title":{"rendered":"Seagate Technology Plc (STX) Q3 2017 Results &#8211; Earnings Call Transcript &#8211; Seeking Alpha"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Seagate Technology Plc (NASDAQ:STX)  <\/p>\n<p>    Q3 2017 Earnings Call  <\/p>\n<p>    April 26, 2017 9:00 am ET  <\/p>\n<p>    Executives  <\/p>\n<p>    Kate Scolnick - Seagate Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephen James Luczo - Seagate Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    David H. Morton, Jr. - Seagate Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    William David Mosley, Ph.D. - Seagate Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Philip G. Brace - Seagate Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Analysts  <\/p>\n<p>    Joe H. Wittine - Longbow Research LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Edward Parker - BTIG LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Rich J. Kugele - Needham & Co. LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Robert Cihra - Guggenheim Securities LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Operator  <\/p>\n<p>    Good morning. And welcome to the Seagate Technology Fiscal    Third Quarter 2017 Financial Results Conference Call. My name    is Liz and I will be your coordinator for today. At this time,    all participate are in a listen-only mode. Following the    prepared remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session.    As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay    purposes.  <\/p>\n<p>    At this time, I would like to turn the call over it to Kate    Scolnick, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and    Treasury. Please proceed, Kate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Kate Scolnick - Seagate Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to today's call.    Joining me today from Seagate's executive team are Steve Luczo,    Chairman and CEO; Dave Morton, Executive Vice President and    CFO; Dave Mosley, President and COO; and Phil Brace, President    of Cloud Systems and Silicon Group. We've posted our press    release and detailed supplemental information for our March    quarter of fiscal 2017 on our Investor Relations site at    Seagate.com.  <\/p>\n<p>    For the last few years, we have communicated our belief that    data growths trends will continue to drive storage exabyte    demand and the related measurement of capacity per drive and    that units are less relevant to mobile cloud environments and    future client addressable markets.  <\/p>\n<p>    In today's newly deployed architectures and applications,    high-capacity mass storage is critical. Importantly for    Seagate, it is the advanced technology and heads of media, as    well as manufacturing absorption of these technologies and test    capacity absorption that will most significantly impact our    financial performance.  <\/p>\n<p>    Going forward, we will continue orienting our conference call    remarks and supplemental data to key market exabyte results and    other business metrics and discontinue providing unit detail.    We recognize this represents a change for the investment    community in the short term, but believe it better reflects how    we are managing and measuring our business performance    internally and will help our industry to be evaluated more    effectively in a forward-looking manner.  <\/p>\n<p>    During today's call, we will review the highlights for the    March quarter and provide the company outlook for the June    quarter and then open the call for questions. We are planning    for the call today to go approximately half an hour, and we    will do our best to accommodate your questions following our    prepared remarks, as time permits.  <\/p>\n<p>    We will refer to GAAP and non-GAAP measures on this call.    Non-GAAP figures are reconciled to GAAP figures on our    supplemental information available on the Investor section of    our website. We have not reconciled our non-GAAP financial    measure guidance to the most directly comparable GAAP measures    because material items that impact these measures are out of    our control and\/or cannot be reasonably predicted. Accordingly,    a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure guidance to    the corresponding GAAP measures is not available without    unreasonable effort.  <\/p>\n<p>    As a reminder, this conference call contains forward-looking    statements about the company's anticipated future operating and    financial performance, customer demand, technology and product    development advancements and general market conditions. These    forward-looking statements are based on management's current    views and assumptions and should not be relied upon as of any    subsequent date. Actual results may vary materially from    today's statements. Information concerning our risks,    uncertainties and other factors that could cause results to    differ from these forward-looking statements are contained in    the company's SEC filings and supplemental information posted    on the Investor section of the company's website.  <\/p>\n<p>    I would now like to turn the call over to Steve Luczo. Please    go ahead, Steve.  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephen James Luczo - Seagate Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Thanks, Kate. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us    today. For today's call, I will cover the high-level trends we    are seeing in the business. Dave Morton will then discuss    certain financial highlights, and I will close the call with    our outlook for the June quarter as well as an update for the    calendar year.  <\/p>\n<p>    For the March quarter, Seagate achieved: revenues of    approximately $2.7 billion, up 3% year-over-year; GAAP gross    margins of 30.5%; net income of $194 million; and diluted    earnings per share of $0.65. On a non-GAAP basis, Seagate    achieved: gross margins of 31.4%, up 870 basis points    year-over-year; net income of $329 million; and diluted    earnings per share of $1.10. Cash flow from operations for the    quarter was $426 million, up 108% year-over-year.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our March quarter results reflect a relatively stable demand    environment and improved profitability year-over-year. HDD    exabyte shipments for the March quarter were 65.5 exabytes, up    approximately 18% year-over-year. Average capacity per drive    across the HDD portfolio was approximately 1.8 terabytes per    drive, up 27% year-over-year. ASPs of $67 were sequentially    flat for the March quarter and up 10% year-over-year. Our Cloud    Systems and Silicon Group demonstrated 19% year-over-year    growth in the March quarter, with particular strength in our    flash-based solutions.  <\/p>\n<p>    We are pleased with Seagate's execution in the March quarter,    both in terms of our ability to maximize the profitability of    our storage technology portfolio and our continued execution on    operational efficiencies.  <\/p>\n<p>    I will turn the call over to Dave Morton now to go into more    detail on our operational activities.  <\/p>\n<p>    David H. Morton, Jr. - Seagate Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Thanks, Steve. For the March quarter, Seagate's addressable HDD    market was relatively in line with our forecast. We continue to    drive our HDD product sales towards our higher capacity    products across our portfolio, benefiting both our revenue and    margin results year-over-year.  <\/p>\n<p>    HDD enterprise revenues were up 3% year-over-year, reflecting    exabyte growth of 20% year-over-year and representing 36% of    our total consolidated revenue. Within this, nearline revenues    were up 9% year-over-year and represented 24% of our total    consolidated revenue. Hyperscale nearline revenues were up    strong double digits, and our 8 terabyte nearline product    continues to be our leading revenue SKU.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our HDD client high-capacity growth opportunities include    consumer, surveillance, DDR and NAS markets. Revenues from    these markets were up 25% year-over-year, reflecting exabyte    growth of 41% year-over-year and representing approximately 28%    of the total consolidated revenue. Average capacity per drive    across these markets was over 2 terabyte per drive, up 22%    year-over-year.  <\/p>\n<p>    In our mature mission critical and PC client markets, revenues    declined year-over-year, as expected, and exabytes declined    slightly. PC client revenues continue to represent    approximately 25% of the total consolidated revenue.  <\/p>\n<p>    Operating expenses for the March quarter were $550 million on a    GAAP basis and $443 million on a non-GAAP basis. Total    consolidated expenses were slightly higher than forecast,    primarily due to non-executive variable compensation.  <\/p>\n<p>    Capital expenditures were $95 million for the March quarter for    maintenance capital and manufacturing footprint redeployment    supporting the continued ramp of new HDD products in our    portfolio that utilize new tooling and equipment. Our capital    expenditures and maintenance capital requirement levels are    expected to be less than 5% of our revenue for the remainder of    the fiscal year. And through our manufacturing consolidation    activities, Seagate is and will continue to operate at, or very    near, full capacity.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cash flow from operations in the March quarter was $426 million    and free cash flow was $331 million. These results include    approximately $150 million in cash payments related to    restructuring charges and biannual non-executive variable    compensation. Excluding these items, cash flow from operations    would have been approximately $576 million.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our balance sheet remains healthy, and we ended the March    quarter in $3 billion in cash and cash equivalents and 297    million ordinary shares outstanding. Our board has approved our    quarterly dividend payment of $0.63 for the March quarter,    which will be payable on July 5.  <\/p>\n<p>    In January, we successfully completed a debt offering of $1.25    billion of investment-grade financing with a weighted average    interest rate of less than 5%. This funding will serve as a    pre-financing of our 2018 and our 2021 notes and other    corporate purposes. We have called our 2021 7% senior notes    with a payment of $158 million scheduled for May 1.  <\/p>\n<p>    Interest expense for the March quarter was $60 million and will    be similar in the June quarter. Our debt structure and level of    interest expense continues to be well within our financial    capabilities and reflective of our investment-grade framework,    given our staggered maturities and low interest rate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our March quarter results continue to reflect strong execution    of our business model objectives and our ability to generate    strong cash flow from our Storage portfolio. Combined with our    Cloud Systems and Silicon Group, we view that approximately 80%    of our Storage product revenue opportunities in calendar 2017    and beyond have growth potential.  <\/p>\n<p>    While we are still in the process of executing a number of our    cost actions in our manufacturing sites and at the corporate    level, we believe the combination of these cost alignment    activities and the competitiveness of our HDD product portfolio    will continue to benefit our product gross margins and overall    profitability of our business over the course of calendar year    2017 and beyond.  <\/p>\n<p>    I would now like to turn the call back to Steve.  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephen James Luczo - Seagate Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Thanks, Dave. A few weeks ago, we launched our Data Age 2025    study with IDC that addresses data growth, location and new    business verticals over the next several years. With a forecast    of 163 zettabytes of information being created over the next    few years, HDD mass storage technology will continue to be a    vital player in maximizing the value of data across many new    verticals.  <\/p>\n<p>    We believe continuing to optimize our full HDD product    portfolio to the structural shifts in application workloads    towards higher capacity will prove to be a resilient and    competitive marketplace strategy. By this time next year, we    anticipate less than 10% of our HDD technology portfolio will    be exposed to competing flash devices.  <\/p>\n<p>    The competitiveness of our HDD portfolio is a result of our    long-term investment in delivering world-class storage    technology and our dedication to product innovation. A few    recent portfolio highlights include: in the nearline market,    our 10 terabyte Helium HDD is continuing to ramp with large    hyperscale cloud service provider customers. Customer    evaluation feedback on our 12 terabyte Helium HDDs has been    positive, and we plan to start volume shipments in the June    quarter. We believe our opportunities in the nearline market    will continue to span across multiple capacity points as our    customers evolve their capacity infrastructure for a growing    multiple of enterprise workload applications.  <\/p>\n<p>    We are successfully refreshing a number of products in our    portfolio, utilizing our fourth generation SMR technology. And    to-date, we have sold over 35 million HDDs into the nearline    client and consumer markets with this technology. We believe    our technical leadership in areal density will continue through    calendar 2017.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our planned 1 terabyte and 2 terabyte product refreshes for the    PC compute markets are on schedule. And this week at NAB, we    announced new consumer products including our first offering    for the drone marketplace, the Fly Drive, which includes enough    space for 60 hours of 4K video footage and developed in    partnership with top drone manufacturer, DJI.  <\/p>\n<p>    From an R&D technology perspective, we continue to invest    in our next-generation areal density HAMR technology. With    products on the road map for the late 2018 calendar year, we    believe we are leading the market in developing and bringing to    market this important cost-benefit solution for mass storage    capacity needs.  <\/p>\n<p>    Turning to the market outlook, we remain cautiously optimistic    about the current macroeconomic environment and IT spending    trends. For the June quarter, we are expecting to achieve    revenues of between $2.5 billion and $2.6 billion. Our    expectations reflect a seasonal decline in revenue, our desire    to maintain lower inventories going into the summer months and    some conservatism due to the potential impact of component    shortages in DRAM and NAND on various aspects of our customers'    businesses in the server, CSP and client space.  <\/p>\n<p>    We are raising our gross margin expectations for the June    quarter to 31%, and we are targeting a new range for calendar    2017 of 29% to 33%. As Dave indicated, operating expenses will    trend sequentially down to expect approximately $430 million in    the June quarter. We anticipate operating expenses will    continue to decline through the rest of the calendar year and    exit the December quarter at or below $400 million. Cash flow    from operations will be down slightly sequentially, reflecting    lower seasonal revenue and cash payout related to our    elimination of U.S. vacation accrual.  <\/p>\n<p>    We continue to expect overall exabyte demand to grow double    digits in calendar 2017 over 2016, representing modest revenue    growth opportunities for Seagate. Assuming market conditions    remain intact, we continue to believe Seagate will achieve    earnings per share of at least $4.50 in calendar 2017, and we    will provide a fiscal 2018 outlook on our July call.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thank you for joining us on the call today. And we'll now open    the call up for questions and answers.  <\/p>\n<p>    Question-and-Answer Session  <\/p>\n<p>    Operator  <\/p>\n<p>    Our first question comes from the line of Joe Wittine with    Longbow Research.  <\/p>\n<p>    Joe H. Wittine - Longbow    Research LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Hi. Thanks. Maybe discuss your go-forward exabyte growth    expectations by the segments as you lay them out. And    specifically...  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephen James Luczo - Seagate    Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    We're not going to provide exabyte growth by segments. That's    highly competitive information.  <\/p>\n<p>    Joe H. Wittine - Longbow    Research LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Okay. Maybe I should ask...  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephen James Luczo - Seagate    Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    We still believe in exabyte growth that's consistent with what    we've said over the last couple of years. Exabyte growth in    excess of areal density growth.  <\/p>\n<p>    Joe H. Wittine - Longbow    Research LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Can nearline still grow in the mid to high-30%s this year after    the 20% start? I ask because the remaining quarters have some    pretty difficult comps. So maybe talk a little bit more detail    with that.  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephen James Luczo - Seagate    Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Yes, I do think they can. As you see the 10s and 12s start to    ramp. I think the first half of the year has been an issue both    of what's really the right marketplace for the 10 terabyte,    especially with the 12 kind of coming right behind it, as well    as the CSPs have been  and we've kind of expected this the    whole time, that the second half of the year was going to be    stronger than the first half of the year. So I think the    combination of stronger demand signals for the second half plus    the rotation of the portfolio that's going to have 8s, 10s and    12s and not just pretty much 8s, you're going to see exabyte    growth there that's going to continue.  <\/p>\n<p>    Joe H. Wittine - Longbow    Research LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Okay. And then as a follow-up, price per exabyte declined at    the lowest rate in a few years. It's now the second quarter    you're kind of in a 13% to 14% range versus the low 20%s range    that the industry has been in. What is a good expectation to    model going forward, given you said you're generally near peak    capacity?  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephen James Luczo - Seagate    Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Yes. I think that's a great question. I think we've got to    continue to be very careful on the pricing, especially, again,    as you go from 10s and 12s. On the one hand, the customer    demand is certainly there for those higher capacity drives, but    the industry's capability to deliver that technology is coming    through solutions that effectively cost more.  <\/p>\n<p>    Either you're adding more heads in disk or other technology to    handle that kind of workload. And especially when you're adding    more heads in disk, you have to obviously be very careful about    the aggressive price takedowns that have occurred because    somehow you have to absorb the extra parts. So I think you're    going to see some resolution where those price declines are    going to continue to stabilize just because we have to afford    the new technology.  <\/p>\n<p>    And, of course, we're not going to end at 10s or 12s. We're    going to have to get to 16 and then 20 and 32, and that's all    going to take a lot of technology. So we definitely believe    you're going to see stabilization in that pricing.  <\/p>\n<p>    Joe H. Wittine - Longbow    Research LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Okay. Thanks, Steve.  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephen James Luczo - Seagate    Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Yes. Thanks.  <\/p>\n<p>    Operator  <\/p>\n<p>    Our next question comes from Edward Parker with BTIG.  <\/p>\n<p>    Edward Parker - BTIG    LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Thanks. Steve, I wanted to ask you about price elasticity and    I'm just wondering if you could talk a little bit more about    the impact of higher NAND pricing in the quarter on your HDD    business. Are you seeing higher unit sales because of higher    prices for SSDs or higher unit sales because of the lack of    availability for SSDs?  <\/p>\n<p>    And then secondly, how do you think about price elasticity    across your portfolio? And how could that change as you look at    your business over the next couple of years?  <\/p>\n<p>    Stephen James Luczo - Seagate    Technology Plc  <\/p>\n<p>    Well, I think the NAND shortages are interesting because, at    the end of the day, I think it's more challenging for the    technology industry to deal with the shortages than it is maybe    beneficial to HDDs because of some comparison on a 500 gig. I    mean, the reality is even a 500-gig NAND drive, at today's    prices or even at six months ago prices, aren't remotely    competitive to an HDD price.  <\/p>\n<p>    I do think that the lack of availability of NAND in certain    market segments results in people then shifting their    strategies around do they use HDDs or not. So I think, for    example, the NAND companies are constantly optimizing where do    they shift their NAND. Does to go into phones? Does it go into    the data centers? Does it go into the servers or does it go    into the PCs? And depending on the grade of flash you're    building, the capacity plans you put in six months ago and then    what customers are asking for, there's this constant    re-optimization of where the NAND is flowing.  <\/p>\n<p>    I think in the short term probably, and I think HP indicated    this on their call two quarters ago, that they felt that the PC    industry was being constrained a bit on NAND. I think that    probably has shifted some longer-term strategy around product    portfolios that breathes some more life into the HDD space, in    that people don't want to be caught short with storage    technology of any type. And, of course, there again we're    talking about 128 or 256.  <\/p>\n<p>    For us, it's really an issue of getting the volumes ramped on    the 1TB, where we have a substantial lead, and then offering    that product to the PC companies that maybe today are taking a    lot of 500- gig product because at volume, obviously, it's a    single-disk and two-headed product, so we can be quite    competitive. So I think from a Seagate perspective, we feel    that the shortage overall might marginally help us on the    client space as we move through the calendar year and maybe    even to the beginning of next year.  <\/p>\n<p>    I think where it's more problematic for the industry in    general, and I mean everyone, is if it's constraining    build-outs at all at the CSP space, that with the DRAM    shortages. And we have seen indications of certain deployments    being delayed because they basically can't get all the    component technology that they need across the board. We    experience that a little bit in our own CSSG business, where we    obviously need to get flash to sell our flash drives.  <\/p>\n<p>    We have a big demand profile for our current-generation    products, which are quite competitive. But we're constrained by    as much as $40 million or $50 million in revenue in terms of    can we get the flash or not. So that's one of the issues that    we're going to be working hard and one of the reasons that I    think there is some opportunity on the revenue side if we can    secure that NAND. So it's a pretty dynamic situation that    you're on top of.  <\/p>\n<p>    I don't know that it's as easy to say that it's good or bad. I    think there's some good to it and there's some pressures from    it. We've always said it's a better world if there's a lot of    NAND because that means people have more devices in their hand    and they're creating more data. And that's still our thesis.  <\/p>\n<p>    Next question?  <\/p>\n<p>    Operator  <\/p>\n<p>    Our next question comes from the line of Rich Kugele with    Needham & Company.  <\/p>\n<p>    Rich J. Kugele - Needham &    Co. LLC  <\/p>\n<p>    Thank you. Good morning. Steve, can you just elaborate a little    more about your comment that less than 10% of your portfolio    would be exposed to competing flash devices? Like over what    timeframe are you referring and how do you get there? Is that    walking away from categories, or is that just a mix change    towards more cloud service providers?  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continued here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/4065542-seagate-technology-plc-stx-q3-2017-results-earnings-call-transcript\" title=\"Seagate Technology Plc (STX) Q3 2017 Results - Earnings Call Transcript - Seeking Alpha\">Seagate Technology Plc (STX) Q3 2017 Results - Earnings Call Transcript - Seeking Alpha<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Seagate Technology Plc (NASDAQ:STX) Q3 2017 Earnings Call April 26, 2017 9:00 am ET Executives Kate Scolnick - Seagate Technology Plc Stephen James Luczo - Seagate Technology Plc David H. Morton, Jr <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/technology\/seagate-technology-plc-stx-q3-2017-results-earnings-call-transcript-seeking-alpha\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187726],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189675"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189675\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}